So you are saying that our planet has the ability to absorb some fluctuations and still be habitable. The word equilibrium comes to mind. Aw, heck. Let's devastate the global economy, anyway, so that global warming scientists (oops! I mean climate change scientists) will have plenty of business, research grants, prestige, and power.
When a plausible naturalistic explanation is put forward (other than random chemicals self organizing into highly complex, self replicating systems with huge information content) then I will consider it.
When it is shown that natural selection can generate significant amounts of new information all at once then I will consider it.
In the meantime, show a little objectivity yourself. We are supposed to be the ones who are brainwashed. Consider that it might be the other way around.
Slashdot Mirror
So you are saying that our planet has the ability to absorb some fluctuations and still be habitable. The word equilibrium comes to mind. Aw, heck. Let's devastate the global economy, anyway, so that global warming scientists (oops! I mean climate change scientists) will have plenty of business, research grants, prestige, and power.
When a plausible naturalistic explanation is put forward (other than random chemicals self organizing into highly complex, self replicating systems with huge information content) then I will consider it. When it is shown that natural selection can generate significant amounts of new information all at once then I will consider it. In the meantime, show a little objectivity yourself. We are supposed to be the ones who are brainwashed. Consider that it might be the other way around.