I'm not a programmer, but I hang around on a few mailing lists.
I remember a year or so ago, GNOME was using mico for their ORB. This caused problems, as at the time mico was slow and had way more features than GNOME needed. Hence, GNOME uses ORBit these days instead of mico.
I've noticed looking through the KDE download areas that mico is still there, and I was curious how well mico works out. Has it improved as far as speed goes, or are you planning to switch to another ORB eventually? Speed is a very important factor, and as KDE becomes more object-oriented, a slow ORB will reduce preformance considerably.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm not a programmer, but I hang around on a few mailing lists.
I remember a year or so ago, GNOME was using mico for their ORB. This caused problems, as at the time mico was slow and had way more features than GNOME needed. Hence, GNOME uses ORBit these days instead of mico.
I've noticed looking through the KDE download areas that mico is still there, and I was curious how well mico works out. Has it improved as far as speed goes, or are you planning to switch to another ORB eventually? Speed is a very important factor, and as KDE becomes more object-oriented, a slow ORB will reduce preformance considerably.