I don't understand, why would you post a video that proves his point and act like it disproves him?
The only thing in that video is a guy who breaks the law and gets dealt within appropriately.
Or are you one of those morons who is too stupid to realize he broke the law repatedly and could have avoided getting tased if he'd just followed instructions and left peacefully?
"If you say "You can say anything you want, but you can't say it where people can hear you" then that's not really freedom of speech."
Yeah, that's exactly wrong.
If you can say anything you want, that's freedom of speech.
The government has no right or responsibility to make sure you get heard, and YOU have no right to be heard, only to speak.
So, having demonstrated your inability to grasp the nuances of this discussion, fuck off now.
Because while you're perfectly within your rights to say what you like, I'm within mine to ignore yor moron ass because your points fail totally and your argument is moronic.
"So people with money get to work faster, and people with out will get taxed more."
No, and framing the issue that way doesn't make you right, it makes you a liar.
EVERYONE will get taxed more liar, as it should be. People with who use the toll roads don't get to forget about the surface streets, they get to pay for those AS WELL AS the tolls they normally pay.
Stop trying so hard to manufacture a reason for the "people with out" to get upset, your attempt was transparent, wrong and massively stupid.
* MetroBridge Networks serves businesses in Arizona and Greater Seattle with connections up to 2500 Mbit/s with >8000 sq miles of coverage area.
* Valtech Communications deployed network in Northwest Ohio in beginning of 2006. Planning to deploy in Columbus, Ohio in fall of 2007. Currently holding licenses for Ohio and Southwest Florida.
* Clearwire holds 2.5 GHz licences in several regions, and is running a test market in the Northwestern United States in preparation to deploy a nationwide network to rival the other nationwide carriers.
* Sprint Nextel holds licences in the 2.5 GHz band covering most of the U.S. Sprint plans to build a "Nationwide advanced wireless broadband network expected to cover 100 million people in 2008." [20] Chicago, Baltimore and Washington D.C. are named as U.S. cities scheduled to be online by the end of 2008 under the brand name Xohm.[21]
* NextWave Wireless holds licences in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz band.
* Xanadoo operates Navini-based pre-WiMax networks in the 2.5 GHz spectrum in 6 markets in the midwest.
* Open Range plans to deploy on Oregon Coast in first half of 2007
* Conterra in Columbia, SC, Charlotte, NC, and nearby areas.
* Illinois, Quad-Cities Online ISP to Build 4G Network with Nortel WiMAX Technology - QCO's 802.16e WiMAX network will run over 2.5 GHz spectrum[22]"
It did not happen in "towns" as he claimed. FACT. The votes were not lost, FACT. It was covered on a news site he OBVIOUSLY reads, as he posts here. FACT.
Should I go on, or do you realize that I'm right and you're an idiot?
"You don't know what is the effect of being born to an animal with the reduced telomeres and possibly other genetic anomalies untested as game stock."
Don't need to you fucking retard. All we need to know is what EATING THEM does, and we eat animals with questionable genetics every day. Owned.
"When you're too stupid to even notice that you could be wrong, which in fact you are"
What am I wrong about? You ARE an ignoramus, and everything I said is accurate. YOU on the other hand, not only lied but misrepresented facts. And I hate liars (like you) so I'm not holding my tongue.
So YOU fuck off trash, before you say something else that will inevitably be wrong and idiotic.
"You still are clinging to your belief that for some reason marijuana is inherently safe."
No, I'm not you fucking retard, I'm telling you ONE THING, that no can overdose on pot. You are clearly too fucking stupid to realize the "inherently safe argument" was made by someone else.
"Let's count the insults that were used against me by the person who seems to feel that marijuana is inherently safe."
Well, since I NEVER said it was inherently safe, you're not only wrong but you're doubly wrong and even more stupid. Look at who you're conversing with cunt.
"But ultimately, you are acting as if I want to take away your weed."
NO you stupid fuck, I'm acting as if you're a fly and I'm swatting you. You're an ignoramus commenting on a subject that you know little about, and I slapped you down for it. "My weed" as you put it, hasn't been an issue since I graduated, as they say, there's a time for shit like that and it's college.
You're wrong in like 9 different ways. Just come back and admit it and get this carnage over with, otherwise I'll continue to point out how stupid you are, which isn't hard as it permeates everything you post.
"US Elections are so bad, so corrupted, that UN observers wont certify them because they fail to reach minimum standards."
Source this please.
You won't be able to, because as others have said, you're full of shit.
The UN doesn't certify US elections PERIOD. They aren't expected to, aren't asked to, and have no reason to. Yet strangely, to people like yourself, that means "they fail to reach minimum standards".
So, a link SPECIFICALLY showing the UN will not certify US elections because they "fail to reach minimum standards" or admit you're a liar, a fact we already know.
"and ignore the facts, just so you can sleep tonight and wake up believing the lie that you are someone who cares about authenticity."
That's funny coming from you, an individual who openly and demonstrably lied and is pretending his lie is reality.
"and far as I can tell, nobody has done jack shit to figure out why it happened. "
That's because THEY KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. Someone forgot to write down the number. THAT'S IT. Get over your persecution complex, someone's granny had a brain-cramp and forgot to write it down. It got fixed (because a ZERO for a legitimate candidate is a pretty fucking obvious mistake) and life went on. Unless you're SuperBanana, in which case, you're ranting about it still even though it a nothing story.
"Furthermore, if they lost ALL of the Ron Paul votes- how many other votes did they lose?"
They didn't "lose" the votes you fucking twat, stop lying.
YOU are what is wrong with politics in this country, a simple mistake, EASILY identified, and obvious to anyone who isn't retarded turned into "clear evidence of fraud" because your boy was involved.
+5 informative my ass, he got every single fucking fact wrong.
Then realize that your idiot ass was claiming someone could overdose (half the time) on a substance which they would have two ingest more than two pounds of, IN PURE FORM, and you'll realize it's impossible.
Or you'll make a stupid fucking argument like the rest, where you claim something idiotic like "they wouldn't say anything because of shame..." which makes sense if you have extra chromosomes I guess
You're an idiot. Attacking me because I tell you you're an idiot without showing you why doesn't make you right, it makes you a bigger idiot because ALL OF THE PROOF YOU NEEDED is easily available and well known.
You're just too fucking moronic to bother looking for it before you share your lack of wisdom.
Fuck off now, you've got nothing left to say but "you're right" and I don't need to hear it from a douchebag like you.
He might be, bu you proved beyond any doubt that you are. If you think ANY of the things you eat are in ANY way related to a "natural process" then you're too stupid to discuss this.
"The newborn clone has the same depleted count of telomeres..."
Which has absolutely fuckall to do with anything, as we don't eat the clones, we use them for breeding stock. The offspring of the clones have PERFECTLY NORMAL telomeres, so your ignorance has led you to raise a point that others have already debunked.
You don't know what you're talking about, and it's imbeciles like you who make debates on subjects like this impossible, because you'd rather inject your ignorant rant than actually bother to learn anything about the subject.
"We cannot be sure that it hasn't happened. You can die from overdosing on just about anything. And if someone did overdose on THC, it could well have been reported as something else to save the family the shame of it getting out to the press."
If you knew anything about the subject, you'd realize why saying this makes you an imbecile.
1: inborn innate 2: belonging to a particular place by birth 3archaic : closely related4: belonging to or associated with one by birth5: natural normal6 a: grown, produced, or originating in a particular place or in the vicinity..."
Your point fails. I was born in the US, that makes me a native.
Why do you people try so hard only to fail so spectacularly? Are you honestly so stupid that you think "native" means "indian"?
"No, it explicitly mentions the right to be secure in their persons, papers and effects"
Thanks for proving his point, you'll see the word "privacy" nowhere in there.
And now that you've been proven wrong irrefutably, you'll make a stupid excuse and try to weasel out of being wrong. You wouldn't be Dic Ruby if you didn't.
Constructing impossible thought exercises to demonstrate why something that clearly is a choice has a possibility of not being a choice doesn't mean I'm wrong, it means you're a pedantic idiot who misses points.
"Simple. Make that a protected subject at work, like age, sexual preference, race, gender, health statis, and the like."
Yeah, that's dumb.
First, the idea of writing a new law, or expanding an old one, should be done with serious concern for it's necessity. As it stands, there are much better ways to avoid having your boss get that information than enacting another law.
Second, who you vote for is a CHOICE. Think about how that's different from everything else on your list, and you'll realize why your suggestion fails.
Slashdot Mirror
I don't understand, why would you post a video that proves his point and act like it disproves him?
The only thing in that video is a guy who breaks the law and gets dealt within appropriately.
Or are you one of those morons who is too stupid to realize he broke the law repatedly and could have avoided getting tased if he'd just followed instructions and left peacefully?
I bet you are one of those morons...
"If you say "You can say anything you want, but you can't say it where people can hear you" then that's not really freedom of speech."
Yeah, that's exactly wrong.
If you can say anything you want, that's freedom of speech.
The government has no right or responsibility to make sure you get heard, and YOU have no right to be heard, only to speak.
So, having demonstrated your inability to grasp the nuances of this discussion, fuck off now.
Because while you're perfectly within your rights to say what you like, I'm within mine to ignore yor moron ass because your points fail totally and your argument is moronic.
Your post is complete batshit insanity, thank you for titling it appropriately.
"So people with money get to work faster, and people with out will get taxed more."
No, and framing the issue that way doesn't make you right, it makes you a liar.
EVERYONE will get taxed more liar, as it should be. People with who use the toll roads don't get to forget about the surface streets, they get to pay for those AS WELL AS the tolls they normally pay.
Stop trying so hard to manufacture a reason for the "people with out" to get upset, your attempt was transparent, wrong and massively stupid.
Yeah, that's completely wrong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_deployed_WiMAX_networks#U
"USA
* MetroBridge Networks serves businesses in Arizona and Greater Seattle with connections up to 2500 Mbit/s with >8000 sq miles of coverage area.
* Valtech Communications deployed network in Northwest Ohio in beginning of 2006. Planning to deploy in Columbus, Ohio in fall of 2007. Currently holding licenses for Ohio and Southwest Florida.
* Clearwire holds 2.5 GHz licences in several regions, and is running a test market in the Northwestern United States in preparation to deploy a nationwide network to rival the other nationwide carriers.
* Sprint Nextel holds licences in the 2.5 GHz band covering most of the U.S. Sprint plans to build a "Nationwide advanced wireless broadband network expected to cover 100 million people in 2008." [20] Chicago, Baltimore and Washington D.C. are named as U.S. cities scheduled to be online by the end of 2008 under the brand name Xohm.[21]
* NextWave Wireless holds licences in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz band.
* Xanadoo operates Navini-based pre-WiMax networks in the 2.5 GHz spectrum in 6 markets in the midwest.
* Open Range plans to deploy on Oregon Coast in first half of 2007
* Conterra in Columbia, SC, Charlotte, NC, and nearby areas.
* Illinois, Quad-Cities Online ISP to Build 4G Network with Nortel WiMAX Technology - QCO's 802.16e WiMAX network will run over 2.5 GHz spectrum[22]"
So, when it comes to accurate posts?
YOU=FAIL MISERABLY.
"He didn't get any facts wrong"
Check again douche.
It did not happen in "towns" as he claimed. FACT. The votes were not lost, FACT. It was covered on a news site he OBVIOUSLY reads, as he posts here. FACT.
Should I go on, or do you realize that I'm right and you're an idiot?
"By the way I agree with the original poster"
No one cares.
Fuck off now.
"You don't know what is the effect of being born to an animal with the reduced telomeres and possibly other genetic anomalies untested as game stock."
Don't need to you fucking retard. All we need to know is what EATING THEM does, and we eat animals with questionable genetics every day. Owned.
"When you're too stupid to even notice that you could be wrong, which in fact you are"
What am I wrong about? You ARE an ignoramus, and everything I said is accurate. YOU on the other hand, not only lied but misrepresented facts. And I hate liars (like you) so I'm not holding my tongue.
So YOU fuck off trash, before you say something else that will inevitably be wrong and idiotic.
When BS is all your post is.
"The reason UN observers do not monitor US elections is because US officials refuse to invite them."
http://www.infowars.com/print/nwo/monitor_election.htm
Is it really that hard to read the post DIRECTLY ABOVE YOURS?
I guess when it makes you a liar it's something you have to pretend doesn't exist.
"You still are clinging to your belief that for some reason marijuana is inherently safe."
No, I'm not you fucking retard, I'm telling you ONE THING, that no can overdose on pot. You are clearly too fucking stupid to realize the "inherently safe argument" was made by someone else.
"Let's count the insults that were used against me by the person who seems to feel that marijuana is inherently safe."
Well, since I NEVER said it was inherently safe, you're not only wrong but you're doubly wrong and even more stupid. Look at who you're conversing with cunt.
"But ultimately, you are acting as if I want to take away your weed."
NO you stupid fuck, I'm acting as if you're a fly and I'm swatting you. You're an ignoramus commenting on a subject that you know little about, and I slapped you down for it. "My weed" as you put it, hasn't been an issue since I graduated, as they say, there's a time for shit like that and it's college.
You're wrong in like 9 different ways. Just come back and admit it and get this carnage over with, otherwise I'll continue to point out how stupid you are, which isn't hard as it permeates everything you post.
"US Elections are so bad, so corrupted, that UN observers wont certify them because they fail to reach minimum standards."
Source this please.
You won't be able to, because as others have said, you're full of shit.
The UN doesn't certify US elections PERIOD. They aren't expected to, aren't asked to, and have no reason to. Yet strangely, to people like yourself, that means "they fail to reach minimum standards".
So, a link SPECIFICALLY showing the UN will not certify US elections because they "fail to reach minimum standards" or admit you're a liar, a fact we already know.
"and ignore the facts, just so you can sleep tonight and wake up believing the lie that you are someone who cares about authenticity."
That's funny coming from you, an individual who openly and demonstrably lied and is pretending his lie is reality.
"Forget the "skew", there was clear evidence of fraud in certain towns..."
Ok, that's a lie, read the story instead of repeating something you heard.
"The town did a re-count and magically those votes re-appeared"
That's also wrong.
"This wasn't a case of "oops, we were off by a few"- every single vote for a particular candidate was GONE"
And yet, it was obviously "fraud" and not a simple omission by ONE worker in ONE location. Oh wait, that's exactly what it was.
"What's fascinating is that all of the news stories I've read about the NH primary concerns have neglected to mention this"
Wait, you post on slashdot, but don't read it? Because it was covered right here.
http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/10/1635225
"and far as I can tell, nobody has done jack shit to figure out why it happened. "
That's because THEY KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. Someone forgot to write down the number. THAT'S IT. Get over your persecution complex, someone's granny had a brain-cramp and forgot to write it down. It got fixed (because a ZERO for a legitimate candidate is a pretty fucking obvious mistake) and life went on. Unless you're SuperBanana, in which case, you're ranting about it still even though it a nothing story.
"Furthermore, if they lost ALL of the Ron Paul votes- how many other votes did they lose?"
They didn't "lose" the votes you fucking twat, stop lying.
YOU are what is wrong with politics in this country, a simple mistake, EASILY identified, and obvious to anyone who isn't retarded turned into "clear evidence of fraud" because your boy was involved.
+5 informative my ass, he got every single fucking fact wrong.
"Feel free to reply with an actual argument"
Why? You haven't, you've just spouted ignorance and stupidity.
But since you asked,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LD50
That's the article for LD50. Read it and learn something.
Then read this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LD50_of_THC
Then realize that your idiot ass was claiming someone could overdose (half the time) on a substance which they would have two ingest more than two pounds of, IN PURE FORM, and you'll realize it's impossible.
Or you'll make a stupid fucking argument like the rest, where you claim something idiotic like "they wouldn't say anything because of shame..." which makes sense if you have extra chromosomes I guess
You're an idiot. Attacking me because I tell you you're an idiot without showing you why doesn't make you right, it makes you a bigger idiot because ALL OF THE PROOF YOU NEEDED is easily available and well known.
You're just too fucking moronic to bother looking for it before you share your lack of wisdom.
Fuck off now, you've got nothing left to say but "you're right" and I don't need to hear it from a douchebag like you.
"'Secure in their persons, papers and effects' necessarily means privacy"
NO it doesn't. It means secure in their papers and effects, your INTERPRETATION means that it relates privacy.
The fact that you're an imbecile doesn't make you right just because you say so.
"The Constitution is a description of the real world, not just some word game, you stupid shit."
Is the word "privacy" in there or not?
It's not. So it requires INTERPRETATION. YOU fuck off, now that you've been shut the fuck up.
"Are you just naturally stupid?"
He might be, bu you proved beyond any doubt that you are. If you think ANY of the things you eat are in ANY way related to a "natural process" then you're too stupid to discuss this.
"The newborn clone has the same depleted count of telomeres..."
Which has absolutely fuckall to do with anything, as we don't eat the clones, we use them for breeding stock. The offspring of the clones have PERFECTLY NORMAL telomeres, so your ignorance has led you to raise a point that others have already debunked.
You don't know what you're talking about, and it's imbeciles like you who make debates on subjects like this impossible, because you'd rather inject your ignorant rant than actually bother to learn anything about the subject.
I'm going to let you in on a secret that you're apparently unaware of.
You're a moron.
"We cannot be sure that it hasn't happened. You can die from overdosing on just about anything. And if someone did overdose on THC, it could well have been reported as something else to save the family the shame of it getting out to the press."
If you knew anything about the subject, you'd realize why saying this makes you an imbecile.
"3) Prosecute the supreme court justices who appointed Bush"
If you ever wonder why everyone you've ever spoken to thinks you're a flaming idiot, revisit this statement for all the evidence you'll need.
"Native:
1: inborn innate 2: belonging to a particular place by birth 3archaic : closely related4: belonging to or associated with one by birth5: natural normal6 a: grown, produced, or originating in a particular place or in the vicinity..."
Your point fails. I was born in the US, that makes me a native.
Why do you people try so hard only to fail so spectacularly? Are you honestly so stupid that you think "native" means "indian"?
It appears you are.
"So you intend to deprive non-natives of some of the rights natives have"
You mean like voting and being elected President?
It's already done now, stop pretending it's a "caste system" waiting to happen, you sound incredibly reactionary and moronic.
"No, it explicitly mentions the right to be secure in their persons, papers and effects"
Thanks for proving his point, you'll see the word "privacy" nowhere in there.
And now that you've been proven wrong irrefutably, you'll make a stupid excuse and try to weasel out of being wrong. You wouldn't be Dic Ruby if you didn't.
Morals clause.
Look it up, then come back and admit you were wrong. You won't because your kind never does.
Let me help you out.
Constructing impossible thought exercises to demonstrate why something that clearly is a choice has a possibility of not being a choice doesn't mean I'm wrong, it means you're a pedantic idiot who misses points.
You're wrong, fuck off now.
"I don't see why choice versus inclination matters."
You don't see a difference between something you choose to do and something you irrevocably are?
If you're being honest, that's definitive proof that your opinion is worthless.
"Simple. Make that a protected subject at work, like age, sexual preference, race, gender, health statis, and the like."
Yeah, that's dumb.
First, the idea of writing a new law, or expanding an old one, should be done with serious concern for it's necessity. As it stands, there are much better ways to avoid having your boss get that information than enacting another law.
Second, who you vote for is a CHOICE. Think about how that's different from everything else on your list, and you'll realize why your suggestion fails.