This isn't a compelling case at all. It is another class action holdup that will get we purchasers of the product $1 each and the lawfirm of Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman and Balint, P.C. a fat pile of fees. Notably, their Complaint contains citations to outside sources to support their class status claim, but cites no evidence whatever for their assertions of "widespread" problems with Halo3 other than vague allusions to unspecified blogs, and forums.
Other than scratches on the Limited Edition discs, there are no such reports and counsel for Mr. Nunez should be ashamed for misleading the court with claims to the contrary solely to bolster their class status claim for a shot at a fees jackpot.
Also notable by its absence in the Complaint is any indication that Mr. Nunez sought either and exchange or a refund.
Microsoft has alot of crap that it should be held to account for, but Halo3 ain't it.
Slashdot Mirror
This isn't a compelling case at all. It is another class action holdup that will get we purchasers of the product $1 each and the lawfirm of Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman and Balint, P.C. a fat pile of fees. Notably, their Complaint contains citations to outside sources to support their class status claim, but cites no evidence whatever for their assertions of "widespread" problems with Halo3 other than vague allusions to unspecified blogs, and forums. Other than scratches on the Limited Edition discs, there are no such reports and counsel for Mr. Nunez should be ashamed for misleading the court with claims to the contrary solely to bolster their class status claim for a shot at a fees jackpot. Also notable by its absence in the Complaint is any indication that Mr. Nunez sought either and exchange or a refund. Microsoft has alot of crap that it should be held to account for, but Halo3 ain't it.