Unless you only do an S1 suspend where everything but the CPU is still powered, then S3 suspend is almost as complicated as hibernate. The only real difference is copying all that state information to hard drive out of RAM. Getting the state saved for all the hardware (video, network, etc) is all required for either and that's the hard part.
I've never bothered with suspend for a few reasons: I just leave my desktop running all the time
1,2 and 3 really all seem irrelevant. You likely have the space for a swap disk. You chose not to. The boot speed doesn't matter if you leave the system running all the time. And it only takes one attempt to find out if you'll have trouble with suspend.
Anything before Vista didn't S3/S4 (sleep/hibernate) properly for me. Part of that is building my own machine, so there was more incompatibility than from a manufacturer who would have tested/tweaked the combination before release. But I dealt with several manufactured PC's before that time (belonging to other people) where I've had to say - this isn't going to work and disabled suspend.
Especially since the BIOS-side has OS-specific instructions and only the Windows part is really tested through. Most is probably copy-pasted from an old motherboard and tweaked to work anyway.
domain = an area of territory owned or controlled by a ruler or government. public = you and I
public domain = you and I own this
It's part of our shared culture that we now own together.
A reproduction of an orchestra piece is a new recording and instruments and new sounds. This is not new material in any sense. Format shifting is not a copyright violation / new work or I couldn't rip my CD's to MP3/AAC - are you on the RIAA's side?
So physical distribution is somehow more special than digital distribution? This is a monetized streaming service. Making a DVD takes no more real effort and there are literally hundreds of DVDs out there with the same content in dollar bins of stores. I'm pretty sure the streaming version is more popular.
Since the original film prints are inaccessible to almost anyone distributing this work (that would cost more money than you'd make in sales - but a good restoration would be an original work subject to its own copyright), they are all ripped off from somewhere - whether it's an old VHS format shift or from another web site where that had already been done.
Everything is in the public domain unless someone asserts their copyright.
You have a profound misunderstanding of copyright. Somehow getting some trademark mixed in sideways. New works created today automatically have copyright. Old works created before 1976 may or may not have let their copyright lapse without renewal.
Saying everything is in the public domain unless someone asserts it is like saying that those with the money can steal anyone's work they want to because the little guy can't afford to assert.
I can go into any Wal-Mart and buy unlicensed copies of these same videos on DVD for 99 cents. The fact that this is Youtube instead of Wal-Mart makes no difference. That's what public domain means.
Why are you pulling out a legal dictionary? And what is the other factor involved in jumping out a window if the direct cause of your mental state is the substance itself?
If you're going to go that route, sulfuric acid won't kill you but the hemorrhaging semi-dissolved tissues will.
And what if somebody was to do this to Linux? After all they have access to the code, should be easy enough to just rip it off and take it proprietary by following the Google model, what would the difference be? None at all.
That's a bit of a roundabout way to recreate Unix.
You keep spouting off so many off-topic arguments. I don't care about the legality or illegality or the safety. I was only saying that it's not technically accurate to say "not a single person has died directly from the use of cannabis" and that there have in fact been several. And yes, that is the direct cause in those cases.
If you can just acknowledge that and stop changing the subject, this will be over.
In recorded history, not a single person has died directly from the use of cannabis
Why is jumping out a window while out of your mind somehow better than hitting an LD50 threshold? You end up dead either way. Just an odd place to draw the line is all.
Why do you think they always pick ridiculous schemes that are guaranteed to fail? If that's not a mildly hidden attempt at preserving it, I don't know how they could be any less subtle. But at the same time, they get to tell (some) people what they want to hear.
A better solution is that instead of two screens, a projector projects a true light field toward your eyes. A virtual light field with only two focus levels is not really the first step on the way there.
Slashdot Mirror
I found it takes about 20-30 minutes to become fully focused and ease into maximum productivity, which could last for hours if not interrupted.
This × 1000
STK does (or did) some timing stuff that depends on CPU speed
Well that's a problem with STK. This sounds like something someone would do back in the 8086 days.
Unless you only do an S1 suspend where everything but the CPU is still powered, then S3 suspend is almost as complicated as hibernate. The only real difference is copying all that state information to hard drive out of RAM. Getting the state saved for all the hardware (video, network, etc) is all required for either and that's the hard part.
I've never bothered with suspend for a few reasons:
I just leave my desktop running all the time
1,2 and 3 really all seem irrelevant. You likely have the space for a swap disk. You chose not to. The boot speed doesn't matter if you leave the system running all the time. And it only takes one attempt to find out if you'll have trouble with suspend.
Anything before Vista didn't S3/S4 (sleep/hibernate) properly for me. Part of that is building my own machine, so there was more incompatibility than from a manufacturer who would have tested/tweaked the combination before release. But I dealt with several manufactured PC's before that time (belonging to other people) where I've had to say - this isn't going to work and disabled suspend.
Especially since the BIOS-side has OS-specific instructions and only the Windows part is really tested through. Most is probably copy-pasted from an old motherboard and tweaked to work anyway.
I would've thought that booting to anything and deleting hiberfil.sys would fix that.
The original comic, yes. This particular film, no. Pay attention.
domain = an area of territory owned or controlled by a ruler or government.
public = you and I
public domain = you and I own this
It's part of our shared culture that we now own together.
A reproduction of an orchestra piece is a new recording and instruments and new sounds. This is not new material in any sense. Format shifting is not a copyright violation / new work or I couldn't rip my CD's to MP3/AAC - are you on the RIAA's side?
So physical distribution is somehow more special than digital distribution? This is a monetized streaming service. Making a DVD takes no more real effort and there are literally hundreds of DVDs out there with the same content in dollar bins of stores. I'm pretty sure the streaming version is more popular.
Since the original film prints are inaccessible to almost anyone distributing this work (that would cost more money than you'd make in sales - but a good restoration would be an original work subject to its own copyright), they are all ripped off from somewhere - whether it's an old VHS format shift or from another web site where that had already been done.
Everything is in the public domain unless someone asserts their copyright.
You have a profound misunderstanding of copyright. Somehow getting some trademark mixed in sideways. New works created today automatically have copyright. Old works created before 1976 may or may not have let their copyright lapse without renewal.
Saying everything is in the public domain unless someone asserts it is like saying that those with the money can steal anyone's work they want to because the little guy can't afford to assert.
I can go into any Wal-Mart and buy unlicensed copies of these same videos on DVD for 99 cents. The fact that this is Youtube instead of Wal-Mart makes no difference. That's what public domain means.
Why are you pulling out a legal dictionary? And what is the other factor involved in jumping out a window if the direct cause of your mental state is the substance itself?
If you're going to go that route, sulfuric acid won't kill you but the hemorrhaging semi-dissolved tissues will.
And what if somebody was to do this to Linux? After all they have access to the code, should be easy enough to just rip it off and take it proprietary by following the Google model, what would the difference be? None at all.
That's a bit of a roundabout way to recreate Unix.
Write once, run nowhere.
You can install an APK without that. Blame the developers for not releasing free apps directly as an APK.
In that case, it's no different than Windows 8 or 10 or even OS X. There's an app store, but you don't have to use it.
You keep spouting off so many off-topic arguments. I don't care about the legality or illegality or the safety. I was only saying that it's not technically accurate to say "not a single person has died directly from the use of cannabis" and that there have in fact been several. And yes, that is the direct cause in those cases.
If you can just acknowledge that and stop changing the subject, this will be over.
But the point is your fixation on direct toxicity.
http://www.reuters.com/article...
at a speed they're comfortable with anyways
Plenty of people drive around me at a speed that I'm not comfortable with. I don't think that it's safe just because it's fine with them.
In recorded history, not a single person has died directly from the use of cannabis
Why is jumping out a window while out of your mind somehow better than hitting an LD50 threshold? You end up dead either way. Just an odd place to draw the line is all.
no one's going to stand up and protect it.
Why do you think they always pick ridiculous schemes that are guaranteed to fail? If that's not a mildly hidden attempt at preserving it, I don't know how they could be any less subtle. But at the same time, they get to tell (some) people what they want to hear.
Does that mean you can't buy a used Intel CPU and put it in a different brand's computer? Or does this only apply to laptop CPUs that are soldered in.
A better solution is that instead of two screens, a projector projects a true light field toward your eyes. A virtual light field with only two focus levels is not really the first step on the way there.
http://web.media.mit.edu/~gord...
Comp USA and Circuit City opened up locations inside of Sprint stores?