This is when the patient sends a copy - not electronic prescription or physical script in hand. Whether pharmacies follow the law in general on this would be another matter entirely - as nobody generally cares, I'm sure.
In person, maybe, when it's on a prescription pad. But if you get a scanned copy, I'm very certain that you're legally required to contact the medical office to verify.
But periodic tests for eye diseases are in no way limited to those who need corrective lenses.
Maybe not, but degrading vision is a sign for many of these diseases. Telling someone they simply need a stronger prescription when they really have a degenerative disease is very bad. As is practicing medicine without a license (for the corner drug store example)
There's a certain amount of verification required by law - for any prescription. If they didn't get the physical original script, they're required to contact the doctor.
It's not a standard with any legal weight - just something some people agreed to do. And failing to implement it is still not hacking - and are you saying Volkswagen was hacking?
if I'm reading this right (and I may not be), using your login and ignoring Terms of Use is A-OK.
You're reading it wrong. Using your login and ignoring terms of use is a breach of contract (albeit a unilateral EULA). It is not and should not, however, be considered felony computer hacking under the CFAA.
While you won't see your News Feed full of video ads
As of the last few days, I'm getting this now. Any posted video in the feed plays for 2-3 seconds as you scroll to it and then goes straight to an ad. It keeps me from watching videos on Facebook, which is fine by me. Sometimes you just need an interruption to remind you that you weren't wanting to watch in the first place.
They mention this thing called a "Watch" hub, and I've never seen this.
Right around the time they moved to HD, they actually had a bit of a resurgence. I'll admit I hadn't watched it for nearly a decade when I picked up again, but I've been watching ever since. It's been hit and miss, but that's always been the case. A different dynamic, but a good one.
Well...they did promise to have a streaming service soon. Didn't know they'd try brute force buying out an existing one. Though that might be one of the few ways they even get subscribers.
They currently still sell physical media. For the older movies, 1080p is enough to pass down for a few generations, until playing physical media is completely impossible. DMCA will hopefully relax on AACS when DVD/Blu-Ray players come off the market (not that my Blu-Rays aren't already ripped).
On that subject, this is a seriously long way to go to get the rights to release the original, unaltered trilogy a few years early (the rights revert in 2020).
They already know that every dollar that you donate to the SPCA is money that you're not using to help your fellow man. Something tells me they like all other animals more than people.
If you wait for it to load and don't scroll, it will eventually jump down to the relevant section anchor (Sec. 6002). It's a really slow loading page, though.
Literally the only thing it says in the bill is to tell the FAA that they should regulate it in some form. It doesn't restore anything or designate what that regulation should do.
Slashdot Mirror
Read the rule yourself: https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/t...
This is when the patient sends a copy - not electronic prescription or physical script in hand. Whether pharmacies follow the law in general on this would be another matter entirely - as nobody generally cares, I'm sure.
prescriptions are almost never verified.
In person, maybe, when it's on a prescription pad. But if you get a scanned copy, I'm very certain that you're legally required to contact the medical office to verify.
But periodic tests for eye diseases are in no way limited to those who need corrective lenses.
Maybe not, but degrading vision is a sign for many of these diseases. Telling someone they simply need a stronger prescription when they really have a degenerative disease is very bad. As is practicing medicine without a license (for the corner drug store example)
There's a certain amount of verification required by law - for any prescription. If they didn't get the physical original script, they're required to contact the doctor.
I'll admit they committed fraud, but by law I'm pretty sure they have to vet the prescription before filling it.
I forgot my FTFY. I changed the quoted text. They are both part of 21st Century Fox right now (until this deal is approved).
You can't make something unpublic. If your state/jurisdiction makes something public that shouldn't be, it really is on them.
It's not a standard with any legal weight - just something some people agreed to do. And failing to implement it is still not hacking - and are you saying Volkswagen was hacking?
if I'm reading this right (and I may not be), using your login and ignoring Terms of Use is A-OK.
You're reading it wrong. Using your login and ignoring terms of use is a breach of contract (albeit a unilateral EULA). It is not and should not, however, be considered felony computer hacking under the CFAA.
While you won't see your News Feed full of video ads
As of the last few days, I'm getting this now. Any posted video in the feed plays for 2-3 seconds as you scroll to it and then goes straight to an ad. It keeps me from watching videos on Facebook, which is fine by me. Sometimes you just need an interruption to remind you that you weren't wanting to watch in the first place.
They mention this thing called a "Watch" hub, and I've never seen this.
1) It's not ALL of 21st Century Fox. Fox News and the Fox TV network aren't included
Those are both part of 21st Century Fox right now.
This is what happens when you put a fox in charge of the hen house.
In fact, we've nearly put Fox News in charge of the hen house, indirectly.
Reversing net neutrality will allow for more competition with these services.
Interesting theory, but many major ISPs are already part of media companies and would love to eliminate/throttle/ruin their existing competition.
There are still copies of the original out there if you take the time to look.
Right around the time they moved to HD, they actually had a bit of a resurgence. I'll admit I hadn't watched it for nearly a decade when I picked up again, but I've been watching ever since. It's been hit and miss, but that's always been the case. A different dynamic, but a good one.
Well...they did promise to have a streaming service soon. Didn't know they'd try brute force buying out an existing one. Though that might be one of the few ways they even get subscribers.
They currently still sell physical media. For the older movies, 1080p is enough to pass down for a few generations, until playing physical media is completely impossible. DMCA will hopefully relax on AACS when DVD/Blu-Ray players come off the market (not that my Blu-Rays aren't already ripped).
On that subject, this is a seriously long way to go to get the rights to release the original, unaltered trilogy a few years early (the rights revert in 2020).
blocking/throttling/etc is purely anti-competitive
Wrong. Look at P2P and anything else that ISPs don't like.
I thought that was usually Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
That is admittedly a very difficult document to CTRL+F.
What good jobs are there for someone with severe schizophrenia?
They already know that every dollar that you donate to the SPCA is money that you're not using to help your fellow man. Something tells me they like all other animals more than people.
If you wait for it to load and don't scroll, it will eventually jump down to the relevant section anchor (Sec. 6002). It's a really slow loading page, though.
Literally the only thing it says in the bill is to tell the FAA that they should regulate it in some form. It doesn't restore anything or designate what that regulation should do.