That's part of the problem- they won't let you edit the naked short selling page! Try and you will get kicked off.
Try and edit the Patrick Bryne page and you will get kicked off.
The Bryne page makes him out in the worth possible light. The Gary Weiss page makes Weiss out to be angelic!
Weiss is mired in controversy but you wouldn't know if by looking at his wiki entry.
No one can edit the Weiss or the Byrne entries- but one entry reads as if it was written by an admirer while the other reads as if it was written by an enemy! Read them both and you decide which is which.
Wikipeida has a personal vendetta against Bryne- and they are protecting the Weiss wiki entry.
The Gary Weiss article reads like Weiss wrote it himself. The Byrne article reads as if his enemies wrote it.
There is dirt on Weiss- he has enemies- but no one can touch his pristine article.
Byrne has plenty of supporters, and there are facts which support his claims yet no one can modify his negatively biased article.
I guess it boils down to this:
No one can criticize or add negatives on the Weiss page No one can add positives or support Byrne on his page
So the question becomes:
Why is wikipedia protecting the Weiss wiki entry? Why is it ok to tarnish the Byrne Wiki entry?
Weiss claims he never ever edited a Wikipedia article- so why do they protect his bio? This hypocrisy needs to get out.
People need to understand that wikipedia is trying to tarnish one mans reputation while it is protecting his arch enemy. And for what? Why? For whom does the bell toll?
They tell us nothing is going on- that it is all a fabrication on Brynes part- but then you figure out to what lengths his detractors are willing to go- and you need to ask yourself why?
The Gary Weiss article reads like Weiss wrote it himself.
The Byrne article reads as if his enemies wrote it.
There is dirt on Weiss- he has enemies- but no one can touch his pristine article.
Byrne has plenty of supporters, and there are facts which support his claims yet no one can modify his negatively biased article.
I guess it boils down to this:
No one can criticize or add negatives on the Weiss page
No one can add positives or support Byrne on his page
So the question becomes:
Why is wikipedia protecting the Weiss wiki entry?
Why is it ok to tarnish the Byrne Wiki entry?
Weiss claims he never ever edited a Wikipedia article- so why do they protect his bio? This hypocrisy needs to get out.
People need to understand that wikipedia is trying to tarnish one mans reputation while it is protecting his arch enemy.
And for what? Why? For whom does the bell toll?
They tell us nothing is going on- that it is all a fabrication on Brynes part- but then you figure out to what lengths his detractors are willing to go- and you need to ask yourself why?
Slashdot Mirror
That's part of the problem- they won't let you edit the naked short selling page!
Try and you will get kicked off.
Try and edit the Patrick Bryne page and you will get kicked off.
The Bryne page makes him out in the worth possible light.
The Gary Weiss page makes Weiss out to be angelic!
Weiss is mired in controversy but you wouldn't know if by looking at his wiki entry.
No one can edit the Weiss or the Byrne entries- but one entry reads as if it was written by an admirer while the other reads as if it was written by an enemy! Read them both and you decide which is which.
Wikipeida has a personal vendetta against Bryne- and they are protecting the Weiss wiki entry.
This is deep- and a little bit disturbing.
Wikipedia is dirty:
The Gary Weiss article reads like Weiss wrote it himself.
The Byrne article reads as if his enemies wrote it.
There is dirt on Weiss- he has enemies- but no one can touch his pristine article.
Byrne has plenty of supporters, and there are facts which support his claims yet no one can modify his negatively biased article.
I guess it boils down to this:
No one can criticize or add negatives on the Weiss page
No one can add positives or support Byrne on his page
So the question becomes:
Why is wikipedia protecting the Weiss wiki entry?
Why is it ok to tarnish the Byrne Wiki entry?
Weiss claims he never ever edited a Wikipedia article- so why do they protect his bio? This hypocrisy needs to get out.
People need to understand that wikipedia is trying to tarnish one mans reputation while it is protecting his arch enemy.
And for what? Why? For whom does the bell toll?
They tell us nothing is going on- that it is all a fabrication on Brynes part- but then you figure out to what lengths his detractors are willing to go- and you need to ask yourself why?
The Gary Weiss article reads like Weiss wrote it himself. The Byrne article reads as if his enemies wrote it. There is dirt on Weiss- he has enemies- but no one can touch his pristine article. Byrne has plenty of supporters, and there are facts which support his claims yet no one can modify his negatively biased article. I guess it boils down to this: No one can criticize or add negatives on the Weiss page No one can add positives or support Byrne on his page So the question becomes: Why is wikipedia protecting the Weiss wiki entry? Why is it ok to tarnish the Byrne Wiki entry? Weiss claims he never ever edited a Wikipedia article- so why do they protect his bio? This hypocrisy needs to get out. People need to understand that wikipedia is trying to tarnish one mans reputation while it is protecting his arch enemy. And for what? Why? For whom does the bell toll? They tell us nothing is going on- that it is all a fabrication on Brynes part- but then you figure out to what lengths his detractors are willing to go- and you need to ask yourself why?