HTML V5 rewritten as an XML dialect will not probably be a XHTML V5, as XHTML uses is own naming scheme and branching for development. Unfortunatelly, HTML has diverged in two opposite directions, and HTML V5 one is simply better for everyday users/developers.
So when article author says:
(...)
If you only use XHTML V1 because of its XML compliance but you prefer the new features in HTML V5, you might appreciate XHTML V5 (HTML V5 rewritten as an XML dialect).
(...)
... is not biased (unfortunatelly) to correct interpretation but to current misunderstanding
Astronomy is a lot about telescopes, in fact good astronomers do not rely in "amazon" telescopes but in builing their own reflectors/refractors.
But in fact,
the word "quality",
has nothing to do
with the word "fast".
HTML V5 rewritten as an XML dialect will not probably be a XHTML V5, as XHTML uses is own naming scheme and branching for development. Unfortunatelly, HTML has diverged in two opposite directions, and HTML V5 one is simply better for everyday users/developers.
So when article author says:
scripting languages are stuff that matters, programming languages are stuff that worries