Please see the following post: http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=388752&cid=21697170
If "the evidence and observations often directly contradict the electric universe theories", please provide examples of such for starters. Also, where is all the scientific experiments which are used to prove standard theory? Even IF the Electric Universe is wrong that does not make standard theory correct by default. It is still required that standard theory be proven scientifically to be true.
It seems to me that the inflow of current would be through the pole of the sun and then outward in all other directions as done experimentally by Birkeland and as illustrated with the plasma ball.
Also, even if your statement that it does not confirm the Electric Universe theories your statements do not illustrate how it confirms or conforms to standard theory. How does thermal energy account for or explain the charge of the solar wind and the magnetic fields?
Lets also remember that science is based upon experimentation. This is one of the first things we learn in elemenatry science class. Where are the experiments which also confirm the standard theory? Is it in computer models? I could produce a computer model which perdicts anything I want it to. You only get out of a computer what you put in. Thus the term all programmers have heard- "Garbage in = Garbage out."
Please see the following post: http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=388752&cid=21697170 If "the evidence and observations often directly contradict the electric universe theories", please provide examples of such for starters. Also, where is all the scientific experiments which are used to prove standard theory? Even IF the Electric Universe is wrong that does not make standard theory correct by default. It is still required that standard theory be proven scientifically to be true.
Great points. For those interested here are some links dealing with the many issues surrounding "global warming". http://links.veronicachapman.com/OriginsOfOil.htm http://www.iceagenow.com/Growing_Glaciers.htm http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...9-68c808e8809e http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4520665474899458831 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/...n2871211.shtml http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/New...s/Aerosols.pdf http://nasadaacs.eos.nasa.gov/articl...6_highlow.html http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17997788/site/newsweek/?ic http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,269886,00.html http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202007/20_1-2_CO2_Scandal.pdf http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=438 http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2007/arch07/070507martianwarming.htm http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=8gfbewe7&keywords=global%20warming#dest http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071211101623.htm
There are huge implications. Here is an article which addresses just that. http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=8gfbewe7&keywords=global%20warming#dest Another one dealing with mars. http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2007/arch07/070507martianwarming.htm I thought the dust was supposed to make it colder. Wasn't that what killed the dinos? A huge meteor threw up tons of dust in the atmosphere causing an ice age. : )
It seems to me that the inflow of current would be through the pole of the sun and then outward in all other directions as done experimentally by Birkeland and as illustrated with the plasma ball. Also, even if your statement that it does not confirm the Electric Universe theories your statements do not illustrate how it confirms or conforms to standard theory. How does thermal energy account for or explain the charge of the solar wind and the magnetic fields? Lets also remember that science is based upon experimentation. This is one of the first things we learn in elemenatry science class. Where are the experiments which also confirm the standard theory? Is it in computer models? I could produce a computer model which perdicts anything I want it to. You only get out of a computer what you put in. Thus the term all programmers have heard- "Garbage in = Garbage out."