if you look closely enuff at the results you realize that Georgiadis's paper is rather deep, pinpointing what other major figures such as steven Weinberg criticized Wolfram for namely the lack of inconsistency witnessed when it comes down to definitions. There just isn't one coherent definition in the book or if there is one mentioned it is not followed consistently.
Slashdot Mirror
if you look closely enuff at the results you realize that Georgiadis's paper is rather deep, pinpointing what other major figures such as steven Weinberg criticized Wolfram for namely the lack of inconsistency witnessed when it comes down to definitions. There just isn't one coherent definition in the book or if there is one mentioned it is not followed consistently.
Luckily not yet and hopefully for the sake of science the editorial board of Journal of Cellular Automata will never allow this.
U kiddin me? on slashdot nothing is. U must be from the Wolfram clan, then.