>If there is do you have to buy it?
No. But I do have to live in the society that it's influenced by. Saying "if you don't like it, don't buy it, and the problem's solved" is like saying "if you don't like the smog, just top breathing."
We must understand that problems in society can't be written off as other people's problems. We already think this way, it's why most people prefer not to have violent criminals in their neighborhood.
In AI research these days, is the Turing test still seen as a valid benchmark of how to gauge how intelligent programs actually are? Do you think that a machine would be able to pass the Turing test without being able to truly think, and, if so, is there a better test out there?
Slashdot Mirror
>If there is do you have to buy it? No. But I do have to live in the society that it's influenced by. Saying "if you don't like it, don't buy it, and the problem's solved" is like saying "if you don't like the smog, just top breathing." We must understand that problems in society can't be written off as other people's problems. We already think this way, it's why most people prefer not to have violent criminals in their neighborhood.
In AI research these days, is the Turing test still seen as a valid benchmark of how to gauge how intelligent programs actually are? Do you think that a machine would be able to pass the Turing test without being able to truly think, and, if so, is there a better test out there?