Oh here we go again. Please link instances where properly and substantively peer reviewed papers that refute AGW has been denied publication by a respected science journal. If you can't, it's pure conjecture on your part at best, spreading FUD at worst.
I think what I read on an earlier /. comment sums this up the best. AGW or not, don't #@$#ing trash the planet!
Oh here we go again. Please link instances where properly and substantively peer reviewed papers that refute AGW has been denied publication by a respected science journal. If you can't, it's pure conjecture on your part at best, spreading FUD at worst.