Nobody was protesting working class people. It's NAZIs being protested. And the ONLY place for NAZIs in the political arena is at the end of a fist.
I'm 100% sure the gay jewish guy is not the Nazi in this picture. You can call anyone you want a Nazi, because of any made-up bullshit. It does not justify violence.
In the 30s, as now, you can spot the fascists by their actions: they're the ones breaking shop windows because of invented BS about people they've decided to hate.
They do serve a purpose - the same purpose served by putting attractive people in all other advertising contexts. A booth exists for the same reasons as a TV ad.
That's what's known as "logical reasoning from basic truths". Scary and foreign to you, I know. Maybe read the posts while wearing sunglasses to lessen the impact.
Oh right, like the teaparty protests didn't get violent at times ?
Never heard of any such thing. If so, that was totally unacceptable, as is all political violence.
And now I'll really blow your mind
You're a college sophomore, aren't you?
Anyway, they ARE justified to use violence. This is the outbreak of the second civil war at the very least, world war 3 most likely. They are literally fighting for their lives, to protect themselves and their loved ones
Wow, any more bullshit you want to make up between bong hits?
And the right doesn't get to complain.
As you've no doubt said your whole life. Well guess what, the pendulum is swinging the other way. The self-appointed elite have been rejected at the poles, in the US and the UK. Working-class people are having their turn in the sun.
Everyone has the right to complain. No one has the right to engage in political violence These two ideas are the foundation of a free society.
The guys I see wearing black, breaking shop windows, starting fires, and protesting Jewish speakers, are Antifa. When fascism comes again it will wear the guise of anti-fascism.
Is that a new word or are we re-spelling the long-established word "kludge"?
Nope. Kluge is the right spelling, and the right pronunciation. The Jaron File speaks thusly:
Nowadays this term is often encountered in the variant spelling 'kludge'. Reports from old farts are consistent that 'kluge' was the original spelling, reported around computers as far back as the mid-1950s and, at that time, used exclusively of hardware kluges. In 1947, the New York Folklore Quarterly reported a classic shaggy-dog story 'Murgatroyd the Kluge Maker' then current in the Armed Forces, in which a 'kluge' was a complex and puzzling artifact with a trivial function. Other sources report that 'kluge' was common Navy slang in the WWII era for any piece of electronics that worked well on shore but consistently failed at sea. . . . TMRC and the MIT hacker culture of the early '60s seems to have developed in a milieu that remembered and still used some WWII military slang (see also foobar). It seems likely that 'kluge' came to MIT via alumni of the many military electronics projects that had been located in Cambridge (many in MIT's venerable Building 20, in which TMRC is also located) during the war.
The variant 'kludge' was apparently popularized by the Datamation article mentioned under kludge; it was titled How to Design a Kludge (February 1962, pp. 30, 31). This spelling was probably imported from Great Britain, where kludge has an independent history (though this fact was largely unknown to hackers on either side of the Atlantic before a mid-1993 debate in the Usenet group alt.folklore.computers over the First and Second Edition versions of this entry; everybody used to think kludge was just a mutation of kluge). It now appears that the British, having forgotten the etymology of their own 'kludge' when 'kluge' crossed the Atlantic, repaid the U.S. by lobbing the 'kludge' orthography in the other direction and confusing their American cousins' spelling!
My sig says it all. America was built as a system to limit the power of a ruler you don't like. Seems like we've weakened those constraints in the past century. Perhaps a smaller, less power central government would prevent this sort of thing from ever being an issue? That was, after all, the founding principle of this nation.
There was no shooting at Berkeley. There was a shooting, but it was clearly justified self-defense, and the cops didn't bring charges. There will be more and more of that sort of thing if the left can't get its temper-tantrums under control.
Clearly you're not a fan of democracy if you want to surrender the sovereignty of Britain to the unelected few who rule the EU.
Anyhow, democracy was never based on the premise of an intelligent an informed electorate. Who could believe that rubbish premise? It's based on the idea that when things get so bad that no amount of lies by the government can fool them, they can overthrow that government without violence.
Democracy in the UK has very much worked. It's working less well in the US given the wave of political violence we've been having. I hope that's just a temporary temper-tantrum, as it leads to a very dark place if it continues. Just last week we had roving mobs breaking shop windows, starting fires, and beating people with clubs, all in a riot to prevent a gay Jew from speaking. We've seen how that sort of thing ends.
WTF does a factory know about teaching someone the shit they should have learned in high school? We're not talking about a 2-week training session here - they'd do that easily.
Anyway, are you actually saying that providing an education is the job of corporations, not the government? Really? That's the stand you want to make?
Since you have failed to support your claim in the face of contradictory evidence, your numbers look suspect
OK, you're too lazy to even do some simple googling. Were done here.
He asked us, "What do you have to lose?" Well, he has provided an answer. He has attacked the following constitutionally protected groups:
1) The Press (all of them). 2) Judges (all of them. He just called them all political). 3) Lawmakers (Yah, it was pretty much everyone versus trump the last election. Had he stuck to truth I might have had some sympathy here.) 4) disabled/women/religions.
The only attacks I've seen are the Berkeley protestors beating people with clubs. What I've seen from Trump are mean tweets. And no one is immune to criticism just because they're a member of any of those groups. There are fuckups in all walks of life (especially politicians)
And did a lefty just tell me that it's bad to criticize a religion? Really? I'm not even Christian, but after watching 40 years of non-stop, relentless criticism of Christians, Christianity, Christian values, and anything remotely religious, by the left, the hypocrisy of that statement is amazing.
When you need some AV component right now and don't mind paying a bit more. It's also nice for mid-tier TVs (I've had luck getting large TVs shipped from better places, but you do take your chances.)
Did you know - it's mathematically possible for both CNN and Fox to be full of shit? No, really, it's true! Never mistake confirmation bias for accuracy.
And you believe the NYT or WaPo even tries? I mean, they used to once, and the Mail never did, but these days? They were open and explicit in 2016 that winning the election was ore important than truth.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, that's how it's pronounced.
e. Hell, I would argue that Israel has become a NAZI state
Putting this together with your last post, I can see you want a Final Solution to the Jewish Problem. Why am I not surprised.
Nobody was protesting working class people. It's NAZIs being protested.
And the ONLY place for NAZIs in the political arena is at the end of a fist.
I'm 100% sure the gay jewish guy is not the Nazi in this picture. You can call anyone you want a Nazi, because of any made-up bullshit. It does not justify violence.
In the 30s, as now, you can spot the fascists by their actions: they're the ones breaking shop windows because of invented BS about people they've decided to hate.
Ha, nice! Is that actually real? I know that sort of belief was popular in the early 30s in the UK and the US.
It's this whole neo-Victorian era. We'll be back to putting skirts on table legs soon enough.
They do serve a purpose - the same purpose served by putting attractive people in all other advertising contexts. A booth exists for the same reasons as a TV ad.
Really this is taking away women's rights not enhancing them. Now they can't wear whatever they want.
Not just rights, this is just more misogynistic basement-nerds taking jobs away from women!
That's what's known as "logical reasoning from basic truths". Scary and foreign to you, I know. Maybe read the posts while wearing sunglasses to lessen the impact.
Oh right, like the teaparty protests didn't get violent at times ?
Never heard of any such thing. If so, that was totally unacceptable, as is all political violence.
And now I'll really blow your mind
You're a college sophomore, aren't you?
Anyway, they ARE justified to use violence. This is the outbreak of the second civil war at the very least, world war 3 most likely. They are literally fighting for their lives, to protect themselves and their loved ones
Wow, any more bullshit you want to make up between bong hits?
And the right doesn't get to complain.
As you've no doubt said your whole life. Well guess what, the pendulum is swinging the other way. The self-appointed elite have been rejected at the poles, in the US and the UK. Working-class people are having their turn in the sun.
Everyone has the right to complain. No one has the right to engage in political violence These two ideas are the foundation of a free society.
How do you imagine someone becomes the leader of the PLO? Hugs and kittens?
The guys I see wearing black, breaking shop windows, starting fires, and protesting Jewish speakers, are Antifa. When fascism comes again it will wear the guise of anti-fascism.
Arafat is the champion, of course. But the "peace" prize has been the Jew-murder prize for some time now.
Yes, yes, it's not like you can edit /. posts after all. None of that 21st century technology here.
Seriously. Do you know what the log (base 2) of a billion is? Math, my friend, math.
Is that a new word or are we re-spelling the long-established word "kludge"?
Nope. Kluge is the right spelling, and the right pronunciation. The Jaron File speaks thusly:
Nowadays this term is often encountered in the variant spelling 'kludge'. Reports from old farts are consistent that 'kluge' was the original spelling, reported around computers as far back as the mid-1950s and, at that time, used exclusively of hardware kluges. In 1947, the New York Folklore Quarterly reported a classic shaggy-dog story 'Murgatroyd the Kluge Maker' then current in the Armed Forces, in which a 'kluge' was a complex and puzzling artifact with a trivial function. Other sources report that 'kluge' was common Navy slang in the WWII era for any piece of electronics that worked well on shore but consistently failed at sea.
. . .
TMRC and the MIT hacker culture of the early '60s seems to have developed in a milieu that remembered and still used some WWII military slang (see also foobar). It seems likely that 'kluge' came to MIT via alumni of the many military electronics projects that had been located in Cambridge (many in MIT's venerable Building 20, in which TMRC is also located) during the war.
The variant 'kludge' was apparently popularized by the Datamation article mentioned under kludge; it was titled How to Design a Kludge (February 1962, pp. 30, 31). This spelling was probably imported from Great Britain, where kludge has an independent history (though this fact was largely unknown to hackers on either side of the Atlantic before a mid-1993 debate in the Usenet group alt.folklore.computers over the First and Second Edition versions of this entry; everybody used to think kludge was just a mutation of kluge). It now appears that the British, having forgotten the etymology of their own 'kludge' when 'kluge' crossed the Atlantic, repaid the U.S. by lobbing the 'kludge' orthography in the other direction and confusing their American cousins' spelling!
My sig says it all. America was built as a system to limit the power of a ruler you don't like. Seems like we've weakened those constraints in the past century. Perhaps a smaller, less power central government would prevent this sort of thing from ever being an issue? That was, after all, the founding principle of this nation.
There was no shooting at Berkeley. There was a shooting, but it was clearly justified self-defense, and the cops didn't bring charges. There will be more and more of that sort of thing if the left can't get its temper-tantrums under control.
Clearly you're not a fan of democracy if you want to surrender the sovereignty of Britain to the unelected few who rule the EU.
Anyhow, democracy was never based on the premise of an intelligent an informed electorate. Who could believe that rubbish premise? It's based on the idea that when things get so bad that no amount of lies by the government can fool them, they can overthrow that government without violence.
Democracy in the UK has very much worked. It's working less well in the US given the wave of political violence we've been having. I hope that's just a temporary temper-tantrum, as it leads to a very dark place if it continues. Just last week we had roving mobs breaking shop windows, starting fires, and beating people with clubs, all in a riot to prevent a gay Jew from speaking. We've seen how that sort of thing ends.
, and creating their own training programs.
WTF does a factory know about teaching someone the shit they should have learned in high school? We're not talking about a 2-week training session here - they'd do that easily.
Anyway, are you actually saying that providing an education is the job of corporations, not the government? Really? That's the stand you want to make?
Since you have failed to support your claim in the face of contradictory evidence, your numbers look suspect
OK, you're too lazy to even do some simple googling. Were done here.
He asked us, "What do you have to lose?" Well, he has provided an answer. He has attacked the following constitutionally protected groups:
1) The Press (all of them).
2) Judges (all of them. He just called them all political).
3) Lawmakers (Yah, it was pretty much everyone versus trump the last election. Had he stuck to truth I might have had some sympathy here.)
4) disabled/women/religions.
The only attacks I've seen are the Berkeley protestors beating people with clubs. What I've seen from Trump are mean tweets. And no one is immune to criticism just because they're a member of any of those groups. There are fuckups in all walks of life (especially politicians)
And did a lefty just tell me that it's bad to criticize a religion? Really? I'm not even Christian, but after watching 40 years of non-stop, relentless criticism of Christians, Christianity, Christian values, and anything remotely religious, by the left, the hypocrisy of that statement is amazing.
No, that was Donald Trump. He told lies about himself. About Hillary. About the state of the country. He even lied about how he won the election.
A politician? Lie? Who could have seen that coming?
There was a time when the press was more honest than the politicians. Now it feels like 19th century yellow journalism all over again.
The only reason to go into a Best Buy is... um...
When you need some AV component right now and don't mind paying a bit more. It's also nice for mid-tier TVs (I've had luck getting large TVs shipped from better places, but you do take your chances.)
Facts obtained from Faux news no doubt!
Did you know - it's mathematically possible for both CNN and Fox to be full of shit? No, really, it's true! Never mistake confirmation bias for accuracy.
And you believe the NYT or WaPo even tries? I mean, they used to once, and the Mail never did, but these days? They were open and explicit in 2016 that winning the election was ore important than truth.
CNN fired all their investigative reporters years ago They're the media arm of the Democratic party, and are quite content being so.