I was born in Russia, lived in US, naturalized US citizen, now working in Ontario, Canada.
I would like to take you to the last federal election in Canada where liberal party was bashing Steven Harper for going to church. Faith based schools were the main election issue in recent provincial election in Ontario, so stop this BS about "The US bizarre fascination for religion" and listen to something other than socialist biased Canadian media.
I personaly like McCain, because he seems to be more straighforward, clear and simple, compared to wishy-washy Romney, leaving-in-the-dreamworld Huckabee and... what is the other guy's name? I cannot seem to remember...
How do we know that the electronic results are the ones that were rigged and not the paper ones? It is much easier to change/destroy/replace a paper than to hack the machine. At least for the latter one needs at least a few braincells, while for the first no brain power is required.
Why is it every time there is a controversial vote outcome there are always allegations of fraud, meanwhile I am still to see definite proof of it? Why did not anyone entertain the possibility that outcome in different precincts can actually be different?
There is a way to keep a secret ballot and still have a fair and transparent voting system. Those who support current mess and refuse any change are the ones who are looking to potentially benefit from it by, say, rigging the vote...?
Slashdot Mirror
I was born in Russia, lived in US, naturalized US citizen, now working in Ontario, Canada. I would like to take you to the last federal election in Canada where liberal party was bashing Steven Harper for going to church. Faith based schools were the main election issue in recent provincial election in Ontario, so stop this BS about "The US bizarre fascination for religion" and listen to something other than socialist biased Canadian media. I personaly like McCain, because he seems to be more straighforward, clear and simple, compared to wishy-washy Romney, leaving-in-the-dreamworld Huckabee and... what is the other guy's name? I cannot seem to remember...
How do we know that the electronic results are the ones that were rigged and not the paper ones? It is much easier to change/destroy/replace a paper than to hack the machine. At least for the latter one needs at least a few braincells, while for the first no brain power is required. Why is it every time there is a controversial vote outcome there are always allegations of fraud, meanwhile I am still to see definite proof of it? Why did not anyone entertain the possibility that outcome in different precincts can actually be different? There is a way to keep a secret ballot and still have a fair and transparent voting system. Those who support current mess and refuse any change are the ones who are looking to potentially benefit from it by, say, rigging the vote...?