Slashdot Mirror


User: slicerwizard

slicerwizard's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
13
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 13

  1. Re:Are the #s supposed to be multiplied by 40? on Crazy Firewall Log Activity — What Does It Mean? · · Score: 1

    I would say that they have to be. He didn't take 7.5 packets from his 1/40th filtered data and multiply by 40 to get 300, did he?

    If so, it's pretty stupid of him to not scale the numbers for presentation or at least mention that "Oh yeah, that 300 really means probably about 12,000..."

    And not doing the geolocation on all of the data himself - WTF?

  2. "How Many Admins Per User?" on How Many Admins Per User/Computer Have You Seen? · · Score: 1

    Is the article writer suggesting there should be more admins than users?

  3. Re:Characters were not always 8-bit on HDD Manufacturers Moving To 4096-Byte Sectors · · Score: 1

    Yes, 370s had base 10 math opcodes for business-type apps, along with the normal binary add/sub/shift/etc. opcodes - just like x86 processors do. So what's your point?

  4. Re:How many watts is this? on Body Heat Energy Generation · · Score: 1

    Watches draw very little power, so yes you could.

    Half a watt? Sure - with solar panels alone. But exactly watt would be the point?

  5. Re:How many watts is this? on Body Heat Energy Generation · · Score: 1

    OMG. How many watts will this supply? NONE.

    That stupid gold headband produces less than 4 milliwats (0.004 watts).

    A small solar cell by a window will blow it away. You will not be using it to power a computer - or even an MP3 player.

  6. Well, I'm convinced... on The Limits To Skepticism · · Score: 1

    "October was the hottest month on record in Darwin, Australia". Yeah, and it's been what, -40 to -50 in parts of western Canada - in early December? So what's his point?

  7. Re:When Signed/Unsigned Strikes on Bizarre Droid Auto-Focus Bug Revealed · · Score: 1

    This is so typical for Motorola - back in the day when we had to interface their r750+ handsets to Baker consoles, we soon discovered that the handsets would lock up if they were powered/running for 24.5 days straight, thus making them unsuitable as interface devices.

    So we substituted i305 handsets - whose out of control audio AGC made them unsuitable as interface devices.

    So we got to support the customer by showing up at 2am every two weeks to manually power cycle their sixteen r750+ handsets. Thanks for nothing Moto.

  8. Re:Not a Wise Practice on Amazon Patents Changing Authors' Words · · Score: 1

    "First, there is (sic) already pre-existing examples of this practice."

    "Second, as an author, I go through quite an effort to ensure that the spelling and grammar are correct throughout any work that I created (sic)."

    Hm. Convince me.

  9. Re:How to remove that crap? on Two New Class-Action Suits Against EA Over DRM · · Score: 1

    RegDelNull will delete Windows registry keys that contain embedded nulls: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-ca/sysinternals/bb897448.aspx

  10. Re:How to remove that crap? on Two New Class-Action Suits Against EA Over DRM · · Score: 1

    RegDelNull will delete Windows registry keys that contain embedded nulls: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-ca/sysinternals/bb897448.aspx

  11. Re:Her Lawyer deserves some credit too ... on RIAA Wants To Throw In the Towel On 3-Year-Old Case · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Y'all could show your thanks by making Ray your friend: http://slashdot.org/zoo.pl?op=check&uid=912032
    I haven't seen a single one in this thread.

  12. Re:Dirty Pool on RIAA's Throwing In the Towel Covered a Sucker Punch · · Score: 1

    Regardless of your UID, you must be really new here. Try clicking on his name if you want to know who he is.

  13. Re:THis is Good, but file sharing is Good too? on Geek Wins Copyright Lawsuit Against Corporation · · Score: 1

    What about the "You can take any JPG picture and convert it to TIFF and voila! you have a digital negative of that JPG picture at the time you converted it" bit? You can't recover the original pixel data, so in no way is it a "digital negative"