Come on! You are presumably an intelligent person: You have good grammar and it looks like you used spell check (thanks, BTW). So, why would you even have to say something like "Call me biased or misinformed...", when clearly, you did not do any research of any significance. It looks like you just *now* started reading about it. This lends no weight to your opinion whatsoever!
I am sorry if this sounds a little harsh, but I have to say that your response is really not justified in any way; nor does it contribute to the discussion: It smacks of empty partisanship and only serves to muddy the issues that (I guess) you hope address. For the sake of your own dignity (at least), I recommend that you publicly retract your unverified statements and then restate those things you find to be the most important with the difference being, the second time around, that you document your statements (perhaps with some cross references?). Anything less is just a waste of everyone's time and bandwidth.
Slashdot Mirror
Come on! You are presumably an intelligent person: You have good grammar and it looks like you used spell check (thanks, BTW). So, why would you even have to say something like "Call me biased or misinformed...", when clearly, you did not do any research of any significance. It looks like you just *now* started reading about it. This lends no weight to your opinion whatsoever!
I am sorry if this sounds a little harsh, but I have to say that your response is really not justified in any way; nor does it contribute to the discussion: It smacks of empty partisanship and only serves to muddy the issues that (I guess) you hope address. For the sake of your own dignity (at least), I recommend that you publicly retract your unverified statements and then restate those things you find to be the most important with the difference being, the second time around, that you document your statements (perhaps with some cross references?). Anything less is just a waste of everyone's time and bandwidth.