Since they arent yet completly indoctrinated with identity (nationality, religion, race, class) etc. Let them discuss moral/ethical questions.
If you built a system (i thought about this one night when i couldn't sleep) where you pose a simple question: Is it ever ok to kill someone? The majority will thing maybe no. Somebody will object: but it would be ok to kill hitler? If the system is smart enough objections start new branches of the discussion or splits them, links between arguments etc, etc.
With a system similar to that would they reach the same conclusion in the end? Would different questions end up in the same conclusion (it's smart to share resources, love eachother etc).
Slashdot Mirror
forgott that they speak different languages...
must sleep now.
Since they arent yet completly indoctrinated with identity (nationality, religion, race, class) etc. Let them discuss moral/ethical questions.
If you built a system (i thought about this one night when i couldn't sleep) where you pose a simple question: Is it ever ok to kill someone? The majority will thing maybe no. Somebody will object: but it would be ok to kill hitler? If the system is smart enough objections start new branches of the discussion or splits them, links between arguments etc, etc.
With a system similar to that would they reach the same conclusion in the end? Would different questions end up in the same conclusion (it's smart to share resources, love eachother etc).
If this would work it would truly make an impact.