Actually, ID does more harm to those who advocate it than good. It jeopardizes their credibility, and if it succeeds it is not scientifically sound. It starts with the observation that life is too complex to be spontaneously generated, hardly a scientific premise.
This is a tad off-topic but.
As for homosexuals, the practice is hardly natural. Why should be slave to our own desires? The ultimate conclusion of a government that sees its people as unable to control their actions is authoritarian anarchy. a government that prohibits anyone from questioning the anarchy, and ultimately, prohibits people from thinking critically. At the same time, restrictions as basic as speed limits will not exist, suicide, murder, recklessness, etc, will be caught up in a hedonistic soup, outlawing what should be legal, and permitting what should be illegal.
Huge Number? Ever heard of Cesarean Section?
Besides, what do you suggest? There is no good solution for preventing Abortions that are not strictly for the health/life of the mother. You miss the picture. There is one fundamental question here, as my (pro-choice) brother would say. Is it alive, or isn't it? If it is alive, and you support abortion, then you must also justify cutting the heart out of a living person for organ transplant, or other such monstrosity. If it isn't alive, then you must support abortion in all cases. If you still oppose it, then you have nothing to base your opinion on.
I am also insulted by your post, because, I was an infant who my mother should never have had. She was too old. And yet, I am perfectly healthy, and alive today because of her stance on abortion.
Slashdot Mirror
Actually, ID does more harm to those who advocate it than good. It jeopardizes their credibility, and if it succeeds it is not scientifically sound. It starts with the observation that life is too complex to be spontaneously generated, hardly a scientific premise.
This is a tad off-topic but. As for homosexuals, the practice is hardly natural. Why should be slave to our own desires? The ultimate conclusion of a government that sees its people as unable to control their actions is authoritarian anarchy. a government that prohibits anyone from questioning the anarchy, and ultimately, prohibits people from thinking critically. At the same time, restrictions as basic as speed limits will not exist, suicide, murder, recklessness, etc, will be caught up in a hedonistic soup, outlawing what should be legal, and permitting what should be illegal.
Huge Number? Ever heard of Cesarean Section? Besides, what do you suggest? There is no good solution for preventing Abortions that are not strictly for the health/life of the mother. You miss the picture. There is one fundamental question here, as my (pro-choice) brother would say. Is it alive, or isn't it? If it is alive, and you support abortion, then you must also justify cutting the heart out of a living person for organ transplant, or other such monstrosity. If it isn't alive, then you must support abortion in all cases. If you still oppose it, then you have nothing to base your opinion on. I am also insulted by your post, because, I was an infant who my mother should never have had. She was too old. And yet, I am perfectly healthy, and alive today because of her stance on abortion.