In addition, this wasn't a front page story. It was one line in a Slashback for God's sake. And you (by which I mean the people griping) chose to click the link and read it. Nobody pointed a gun to your head and forced you to go here (and if they did, you have other, larger, problems to deal with). If you don't want to discuss the articles, then don't!
Um, excuse me ignorant fool, but this was a front page story for approximately one hour. That was the period of time during which most of us were doing our bitching.
Can we please drop this already? Bringing it up again and again isn't doing any good. It's just too hurtful for those involved. I wasn't, though, so maybe I'm just assuming.
Wow! You're such an insightful, informative, funny guy! So basically by your count, no company would be allowed to make more than one type of product. Corel makes Wordperfect and Corel Linux? Split them up! Adobe makes photo manipulation products and document creation products? Split them up! Yamaha makes tennis raquettes and motorbikes? You guessed it, split them up!
Apparently you just completely misread the e-mail, or didn't read it at all. It explicitly mentioned the fact that participants for the new paying program have not been chosen yet, and that all they're asking us to do now is to update our profiles. Before you flame, know what you're talking about, please.
Yeah, very good observation. See my post in the other article where they used it. Begging the question strictly speaking is assuming something that you can't logically assume and then using that assumption to arrive at the conclusion (which is more often than not the original assumption).
okay, so apparently your definition of the "browser war" is different from everyone else's. true, that doesn't necessarily mean you're wrong. but it makes it irrelevant to argue such a stupid point.
If today someone released a (verified) picture of Al Gore having gay sex with George Bush Jr., would Ralph Nader then win the election? This is purely hypothetical, of course.
If today someone released a (verified) picture of Al Gore having gay sex with George Bush Jr., would Ralph Nader then win the election? This is purely hypothetical, of course.
Just so you know, this type of crap is why no one takes you open source kids seriously. Yeah, sure, a huge multinational corporation with huge market capitalization would fake an infiltration and get the FBI involved in helping them solve the "crime." Get real, idiot.
and that's why you're not a CEO, COO, CFO, Chairman, or even on the board of directors of any corporation. Try telling shareholders who just lost everything (including your grandma) that their money was worth less to you and them than a "kickass" place.
Slashdot Mirror
I DIDN'T Say THEWESTCOAST of What Country!
Not Here On The West Coast! How do you feel about the student tax?
IT'S NOT Wednesday Here On The West Coast!
maybe this theory will hold up when Crusoes start exploding and killing people. QED.
Um, excuse me ignorant fool, but this was a front page story for approximately one hour. That was the period of time during which most of us were doing our bitching.
Can we please drop this already? Bringing it up again and again isn't doing any good. It's just too hurtful for those involved. I wasn't, though, so maybe I'm just assuming.
it's called sarcasm
excellent work. funny post. wish i had some mod point(z).
no, you're wrong. being a monopoly is illegal.
jackass.
Apparently you just completely misread the e-mail, or didn't read it at all. It explicitly mentioned the fact that participants for the new paying program have not been chosen yet, and that all they're asking us to do now is to update our profiles. Before you flame, know what you're talking about, please.
damn, your signature is so fucking lame
Yeah, very good observation. See my post in the other article where they used it. Begging the question strictly speaking is assuming something that you can't logically assume and then using that assumption to arrive at the conclusion (which is more often than not the original assumption).
WRONG!
okay, so apparently your definition of the "browser war" is different from everyone else's. true, that doesn't necessarily mean you're wrong. but it makes it irrelevant to argue such a stupid point.
If you'll notice, the introduction that you're talking about here was written by Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda.
If today someone released a (verified) picture of Al Gore having gay sex with George Bush Jr., would Ralph Nader then win the election? This is purely hypothetical, of course.
If today someone released a (verified) picture of Al Gore having gay sex with George Bush Jr., would Ralph Nader then win the election? This is purely hypothetical, of course.
YHBT.
man, i really, really hope this post was a troll and not a real attempt to be funny. god damn, man, what are you, in kindergarten?
excellent troll. A+
Just so you know, this type of crap is why no one takes you open source kids seriously. Yeah, sure, a huge multinational corporation with huge market capitalization would fake an infiltration and get the FBI involved in helping them solve the "crime." Get real, idiot.
and that's why you're not a CEO, COO, CFO, Chairman, or even on the board of directors of any corporation. Try telling shareholders who just lost everything (including your grandma) that their money was worth less to you and them than a "kickass" place.
so funny i'm going to take another hit from my joint in your honor
bucephalus!