if this tool can analyze structural quality they should create an open source plug in to sonarqube.
additionally they should show the results of the tool and not someone's analysis of the data in text format.
This benchmark doesn't isolate C# and the Java components and then measure them. This is relatively common place on Windows with VS and Perfmon. How would you do this level of detailed analysis on *nix.
What are the best tools to measure and track the fine grained resource utilization, examine queues, and perform call profiling of code? IMHO the standard mechanisms for JMX are very resource intensive and significantly impact any code performance at load.
Even though we pay almost 60,000$ per month per LPAR we are still writing new applications to run on i-series.
I told the team that is building it to do the math. You will have to fire yourself when we put it into production to pay for it. At least ibm is pricing themselves out of the marketplace by getting their final supporters whacked.
if this tool can analyze structural quality they should create an open source plug in to sonarqube. additionally they should show the results of the tool and not someone's analysis of the data in text format.
This benchmark doesn't isolate C# and the Java components and then measure them. This is relatively common place on Windows with VS and Perfmon. How would you do this level of detailed analysis on *nix. What are the best tools to measure and track the fine grained resource utilization, examine queues, and perform call profiling of code? IMHO the standard mechanisms for JMX are very resource intensive and significantly impact any code performance at load.
Even though we pay almost 60,000$ per month per LPAR we are still writing new applications to run on i-series. I told the team that is building it to do the math. You will have to fire yourself when we put it into production to pay for it. At least ibm is pricing themselves out of the marketplace by getting their final supporters whacked.