>It isn't the size of a company that makes it >good or bad. It's not even the amount of power >it has. Whether a company is good or bad depends >on what it DOES with that size and power
I don't think using terms like 'good' or 'bad' about a company is appropriate. As I see it there are profitable companies and unprofitable companies. Of course a company don't necessarily need to be bad in order to make profits, but if necessary moral issues are secondary.
Admittedly some companies seem to make decisions based on moral, but I'm quite sure that they only do it because they believe it will pay off sooner or later, not in gratitude but in cash.
Slashdot Mirror
>It isn't the size of a company that makes it
>good or bad. It's not even the amount of power
>it has. Whether a company is good or bad depends
>on what it DOES with that size and power
I don't think using terms like 'good' or 'bad' about a company is appropriate. As I see it there are profitable companies and unprofitable companies. Of course a company don't necessarily need to be bad in order to make profits, but if necessary moral issues are secondary.
Admittedly some companies seem to make decisions based on moral, but I'm quite sure that they only do it because they believe it will pay off sooner or later, not in gratitude but in cash.