This is just the the thing "my mother/reast of the world except the converted" has against Linux.. Non "fully" tested code coming out a "stable" release...
Marcelo your first priority should be to come up with a plausible patch plan.. ie:
<UL>
<LI>There should be more than a few days between patches, preferably months.</LI>
<LI>There should be a REAL test task force, not
only rely on "nerds".</LI>
</UL>
Without STABILITY Linux will NEVER succeed...
And for Linus on the 2.5 side: Come up with a plan where the kernel is EASY to update.. We "nerds" know how to do this.. But the "TOTAL WORLD DOMINATION" is about the non "nerd/technical" people...
Slashdot Mirror
Nobody expects the Copyright Inquisition! :)
This is just the the thing "my mother/reast of the world except the converted" has against Linux.. Non "fully" tested code coming out a "stable" release...
Marcelo your first priority should be to come up with a plausible patch plan.. ie:
<UL>
<LI>There should be more than a few days between patches, preferably months.</LI>
<LI>There should be a REAL test task force, not
only rely on "nerds".</LI>
</UL>
Without STABILITY Linux will NEVER succeed...
And for Linus on the 2.5 side: Come up with a plan where the kernel is EASY to update.. We "nerds" know how to do this.. But the "TOTAL WORLD DOMINATION" is about the non "nerd/technical" people...