← Back to Users
kanzen_kagiri's activity in the archive.
I was wondering myself why they were underclocking a Q6600 to 1.6Ghz, it's 2.4 by default. Imagine how much faster his calculations could have been with the extra 3.2Ghz. Unless he's accounting for the overhead of Vista.
Slashdot Mirror
I was wondering myself why they were underclocking a Q6600 to 1.6Ghz, it's 2.4 by default. Imagine how much faster his calculations could have been with the extra 3.2Ghz. Unless he's accounting for the overhead of Vista.