How does this make the case for Exchange on the user end? How does ensuring sysadmins having a job correlate to a more effective system? Perhaps look for a cash cow in some other...ehem...[smart] way?
Number of patches means very little if you put it in context of criticality of those patches. I can have 400 non-critical patches that got late patches and still be more secure than the other guy who has 1 critical patch and gets fixed in a day. Thoughts?
Slashdot Mirror
How does this make the case for Exchange on the user end? How does ensuring sysadmins having a job correlate to a more effective system? Perhaps look for a cash cow in some other...ehem...[smart] way?
Heh, with Gmail you don't need an admin and it hasn't failed me once in many years, whereas Exchange has been woefully oversold [sticks tongue out]
Number of patches means very little if you put it in context of criticality of those patches. I can have 400 non-critical patches that got late patches and still be more secure than the other guy who has 1 critical patch and gets fixed in a day. Thoughts?