i think the formula is flawed: for example they say that dimaggio had an 81% chance to get a hit based off of his perfomance from that year. so they adjusted the simulator to use an 81% of the time hit response.
in my opinion you would want to use his previous years data. i know that still doesn't give you an accurate model but you can't base likelihood of what has already happened.
i think the formula is flawed:
for example they say that dimaggio had an 81% chance to get a hit based off of his perfomance
from that year. so they adjusted the simulator to use an 81% of the time hit response.
in my opinion you would want to use his previous years data.
i know that still doesn't give you an accurate model but you can't base likelihood of what has already happened.