Scandisk doesn't do the job, but a defragmenter tool.
The software does this by breaking a file to be hidden into a number of fragments and placing the individual pieces in clusters scattered around the hard drive.
Slashdot summaries are frequently a bunch of opinions stated as if true, followed by pointless questions, submitted by people with a vested interest in the topic. Is this actual journalism, an opening for debate, or does this suggest another purpose?
Note that I wasn't saying it's legal or not. I was only saying that copying is not theft, in that theft has different punishment that copyright infringement. They are different at the view of the law.
Because, if they were the same, why do they have separate law?
taking something that doesn't belong to you without paying for it.
Copying is not taking away!!
Theft deprives someone of something, while copying it potentially reduces (or increases) its value. Copyright infringement is not theft, or we would not need a whole separate law to address it.
U.S. Robotics
No implants will be done without DRM. Trust me.
Maybe you want to rotate your screen... It can be done.
Bender once became a God also, but things were a little wrong... It's not easy to be God!
Yes, I think SL4A (with Python add-on) is much better. I can't believe nobody knows about this on slashdot!! (except we two)
Yes. All sensitive data is correctly hidden under black background nobody can see!
The software does this by breaking a file to be hidden into a number of fragments and placing the individual pieces in clusters scattered around the hard drive.
Have they re-invented FAT file system?
Then, we should call it "learning?"
Why not just "copy" as we have always called it?
Driving schools will quit soon, because cars will be driven by computers.
Look at the mobile phones: switch on pressing another "magic" key and you are at the ROM programming menu.
I'm waiting the day they let you separete different type of files to recycle... I don't like all buried in the landfill... We must recycle!
Slashdot summaries are frequently a bunch of opinions stated as if true, followed by pointless questions, submitted by people with a vested interest in the topic. Is this actual journalism, an opening for debate, or does this suggest another purpose?
Yes.
In fact, you can go full screen on almost any browser and nothing but scroll bars are left (at least in Firefox)...
Remembers me the Evil bit.
What was about "YouTube: broadcast yourself"?
Because, if they were the same, why do they have separate law?
taking something that doesn't belong to you without paying for it.
Copying is not taking away!!
Theft deprives someone of something, while copying it potentially reduces (or increases) its value. Copyright infringement is not theft, or we would not need a whole separate law to address it.
What if everyone did exactly what I did? How long would you stay in business?
What if I sell ice and somebody invents the fridge?
What if I sell steam machines and somebody invents internal combustion engine?
What if I sell books and somebody invents the e-book (that is so easy to copy)?
What if I sell ham and somebody invents a machine that produces ham at no cost?
Can I ask to imprison someone?
And what about copying it to another support (DVD/HDD/memory card/...)?
They're also practicing terrorism: ACTA is so scary!!
"He's using encryption, so he must be a terrorist. Ship him to Gitmo".
Can we say the same for all DRM encrypted media on Internet?
Ah, the American dream
Not only American...
At least that keyboard has backlight (a feature I really appreciate)...
Yes. I think it's better a virtual mouse...