i've heard people say that about microsoft too, and linux, and macs. you really ought to take comcast's level of service into account with the level of service that others provide, and balance it with the amount of bullshit they put you through, to get a good picture of what comcast actually is as an ISP.
i do that to people who try to use my wireless...
it's fun and easy, you just leave it unsecured (WEP counts as unsecured, im afraid) and let an unsuspecting wardriver come along... they get the picture when they attempt to break into my machines and notify me that my wireless is unsecured when they get a nice notice on THEIR screen saying "your entire OS is unsecured, kthxbai".
next time they'll leave alone machines with hostnames like "linux-secured":p
Slashdot Mirror
i've heard people say that about microsoft too, and linux, and macs. you really ought to take comcast's level of service into account with the level of service that others provide, and balance it with the amount of bullshit they put you through, to get a good picture of what comcast actually is as an ISP.
i do that to people who try to use my wireless... it's fun and easy, you just leave it unsecured (WEP counts as unsecured, im afraid) and let an unsuspecting wardriver come along... they get the picture when they attempt to break into my machines and notify me that my wireless is unsecured when they get a nice notice on THEIR screen saying "your entire OS is unsecured, kthxbai". next time they'll leave alone machines with hostnames like "linux-secured" :p
I'm pretty sure they're still waiting on security to get there... clearly, IP laws breed insurgency!
what about people who just read the references?