http://www.dreamnotoftoday.com/ will publish Abuser's (my) response to CCP position they finally confirmed as official. Hope they will be prepared for this future act of sodomia for their lie.
Reasons motivated me to do what i did:
1) CCP Employees threatening me (with account bans, law enforcement
2) 2 years ago there was similar situation, sourcecode was published, CCP asked to return it, that guy did as they asked, but also later provided skilled programmer with it. that's how ISXEVE botting module was created and update up to last days
3) I have seen source from previous leak and i have the one i got from decompiling trinity client. By the list of security issues that exist 2 years ago - no 1 of them was fixed up to nowadays.
Abusers motivation?
If CCP will not go for fixing old issues and start doing something with bots by good, releasing the sourcecode and promoting it should force them do this anyway.
They refused to confirm they were ignoring bots, client security and perfomance issues, instead releasing new content. This caused source go public. If they would agree to confirm their issues, "leak" would never happen.
It's not possible to recompile into new client since graphic engine and some small routines like sound handling, voice chat are implemented as binaries.
This CCP Guys are lying as usually.
Why didn't they say the person who has the sources can craft the bot on Python, able to do the same as usual players can do.
> CRC checks?
Patch blue.dll for them or hook advapi32.dll on signature checking exports (and return result required) to avoid messing with eve files.
> "and poses no threat to our customers' billing information"
tell these to those, who haven't seen the telnet server which is embedded into client and gets activated by python object coming with payload from server
> no advantage can be gained by manipulating the EVE client
If you don't consider using a bot, resembling player's everyday in-eve activities for up to 23 hours a day an advantage........
> Access to the source code for the EVE client exposes no security vulnerabilities
Are you sure? Maybe i should post a python code for your ingame browser, so people with knowledge of security could give a bit more defenite answer?
Slashdot Mirror
You sound so incompetent. Do you think CRC check of EVE files is enough for security?
http://www.dreamnotoftoday.com/ will publish Abuser's (my) response to CCP position they finally confirmed as official. Hope they will be prepared for this future act of sodomia for their lie.
Reasons motivated me to do what i did: 1) CCP Employees threatening me (with account bans, law enforcement 2) 2 years ago there was similar situation, sourcecode was published, CCP asked to return it, that guy did as they asked, but also later provided skilled programmer with it. that's how ISXEVE botting module was created and update up to last days 3) I have seen source from previous leak and i have the one i got from decompiling trinity client. By the list of security issues that exist 2 years ago - no 1 of them was fixed up to nowadays.
Yes i'm Abuser from that chats with Morpheus.
Not possible, since there are NO c++ sources for graphic engine available.
Maybe its time to put sources to sourceforge or freshmeat and make svn distro for it? :)
decrypted, unpacked and decompiled to be precise :)
Abusers motivation? If CCP will not go for fixing old issues and start doing something with bots by good, releasing the sourcecode and promoting it should force them do this anyway. They refused to confirm they were ignoring bots, client security and perfomance issues, instead releasing new content. This caused source go public. If they would agree to confirm their issues, "leak" would never happen.
It's not possible to recompile into new client since graphic engine and some small routines like sound handling, voice chat are implemented as binaries.
This CCP Guys are lying as usually. Why didn't they say the person who has the sources can craft the bot on Python, able to do the same as usual players can do. > CRC checks? Patch blue.dll for them or hook advapi32.dll on signature checking exports (and return result required) to avoid messing with eve files. > "and poses no threat to our customers' billing information" tell these to those, who haven't seen the telnet server which is embedded into client and gets activated by python object coming with payload from server > no advantage can be gained by manipulating the EVE client If you don't consider using a bot, resembling player's everyday in-eve activities for up to 23 hours a day an advantage........ > Access to the source code for the EVE client exposes no security vulnerabilities Are you sure? Maybe i should post a python code for your ingame browser, so people with knowledge of security could give a bit more defenite answer?