When Microsoft finally jumps on the bandwagon for something and starts calling it a "new thing" you're sure to know it's at least a decade or more old.
And yet that doesn't change the fact that neither parallel programming or parallel processing (yes the exact same meaning of the words as you are using them) is not new. All of it is based off of work from the 1960s.
Let's carve our own market and create a completely new technology for a completely new paradigm, parallel processing". Parallel processing is a new paradigm? Since when? The 1960s called, they want you to stop stealing their ideas.
Slashdot Mirror
When Microsoft finally jumps on the bandwagon for something and starts calling it a "new thing" you're sure to know it's at least a decade or more old.
You have to leave your parent's basement first before you can start picking up chicks.
It might be easier, but it won't give near as fine-grained control as this method would provide.
And yet that doesn't change the fact that neither parallel programming or parallel processing (yes the exact same meaning of the words as you are using them) is not new. All of it is based off of work from the 1960s.
Is that before or after you start playing Crysis?
Just wait until they start reanimating corpses...