See I think that is where even my point is being missed. I made no reference to anything supernatural. Unless people are making a leap that anything outside of nature is now considered supernatural. Any influence from outside the environment would be tainting the experiment.
There is lots of passion on both sides of this argument. Most debates are settled when both parties remove passion and clouded examples and rely stickly on fact.
Links to examples of evolution would be appreciate. I await with an open mind.
Go watch the movie. Even the last 10 - 15 minutes and listen to the exchange between Stein and Dawkins. Dawkins finally agrees that some intelligent life form on another planet could have seeded the needed material to start the evolutionary process off. What does that say when one of the leading Darwinist admits that there is the "possibility" that there was some intelligence that started the entire process? At least he was open for the debate. I think that we should also. Sit down without passion and look at the theories. No one has produced a single working example of evolution in a lab. We have observed changes in nature over time and claim that that is evolution when in many cases it is simply adaptation. But even that could be rationally debate as could the genetic engineering that makes animals less suspectible to disease. That is a direct view of intelligent design. We are designing new animals and plants all the time. If that is the case why can we not accept that maybe, just maybe someone or something else did the same thing. It is a simple concept and I think that is what makes it hard for the science community and the general population to accept.
I can take a tangerine, a lemon and an apple and with a good botantist and genetist create a new fruit. I took something and redesigned it to fit a new need. Just something to ponder and maybe open up for a passion free debate.
Right as I get ready to post this I see the google quote of the day:
"I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image."
- Stephen Hawking
Slashdot Mirror
See I think that is where even my point is being missed. I made no reference to anything supernatural. Unless people are making a leap that anything outside of nature is now considered supernatural. Any influence from outside the environment would be tainting the experiment. There is lots of passion on both sides of this argument. Most debates are settled when both parties remove passion and clouded examples and rely stickly on fact. Links to examples of evolution would be appreciate. I await with an open mind.
Go watch the movie. Even the last 10 - 15 minutes and listen to the exchange between Stein and Dawkins. Dawkins finally agrees that some intelligent life form on another planet could have seeded the needed material to start the evolutionary process off. What does that say when one of the leading Darwinist admits that there is the "possibility" that there was some intelligence that started the entire process? At least he was open for the debate. I think that we should also. Sit down without passion and look at the theories. No one has produced a single working example of evolution in a lab. We have observed changes in nature over time and claim that that is evolution when in many cases it is simply adaptation. But even that could be rationally debate as could the genetic engineering that makes animals less suspectible to disease. That is a direct view of intelligent design. We are designing new animals and plants all the time. If that is the case why can we not accept that maybe, just maybe someone or something else did the same thing. It is a simple concept and I think that is what makes it hard for the science community and the general population to accept.
I can take a tangerine, a lemon and an apple and with a good botantist and genetist create a new fruit. I took something and redesigned it to fit a new need. Just something to ponder and maybe open up for a passion free debate.
Right as I get ready to post this I see the google quote of the day:
"I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image."
- Stephen Hawking