Zimmerman wasn't patrolling, he was running an errand, and when told that he didn't need to follow Martin he agreed and told the 911 operator he was returning to his vehicle.
Here's a simple study for you to try. Go look up the periods if highest taxes on the rich and corporations and place that over a chart of economic growth rates. You are in for a big surprise.
That the post-WWII era had high growth and high taxes? (I'm just guessing). Maybe we should tax everything at 100%, then we'll have infinite growth? Were there any other factors involved in the growth during the period?
After you see the results of that simple study - ask youself WHO benefits from feeding the public slogans saying less public oversight of businesses is good for them.
It's good for the customers of the business, because they ultimately pay the cost of regulation through higher prices for goods and services.
To extend that idea a bit further, corporations don't actually pay corporate taxes, consumers do. The tax is just obscured in the price the customer pays.
Slashdot Mirror
There's an old poker saying "you can't beat the rake". Two perfect players will eventually lose all their money to the house in rake or time charges.
Zimmerman wasn't patrolling, he was running an errand, and when told that he didn't need to follow Martin he agreed and told the 911 operator he was returning to his vehicle.
Martin is still dead, though.
The "smoking gun" memo is most likely faked, see Megan McArdle's analysis at http://www.theatlantic.com/megan-mcardle/
Hunt was included with 4.3 BSD, IIRC.
Looks like there's a version still out there called 'neohunt'
http://www.ooblick.com/software/neohunt/FAQ.html
The "founding fathers" didn't put taxes on inheritance, the Federal Government first taxed estates in 1916.
Glenn Greenwald? Master of sock puppetry and a certifiable net.kook.
m l
http://instapundit.com/archives/031632.php
http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/003902.ht
Here's a simple study for you to try. Go look up the periods if highest taxes on the rich and corporations and place that over a chart of economic growth rates. You are in for a big surprise.
That the post-WWII era had high growth and high taxes? (I'm just guessing). Maybe we should tax everything at 100%, then we'll have infinite growth? Were there any other factors involved in
the growth during the period?
After you see the results of that simple study - ask youself WHO benefits from feeding the public slogans saying less public oversight of businesses is good for them.
It's good for the customers of the business, because they ultimately pay the cost of regulation
through higher prices for goods and services.
To extend that idea a bit further, corporations don't actually pay corporate taxes, consumers do.
The tax is just obscured in the price the customer pays.