Dark matter does not emit radiation by definition. It thus has to have enough gravitational pull to keep all EM radiation in. That is a freakin big chunk of matter, not small gravity fields! And what do they mean normal and not normal matter... it's all the same stuff, energy. The energy is just "stored" differently.
This is a non-sequitor. The ionization caused the universe to be opaque. The creation of non-ionized matter (a lot of hydrogen and a little helium) allowed radiation to travel and the universe became transparent. We see the remenants of this as the microwave background. This has nothing to do with dark matter and gravitation. The dark matter merrily broke the symmetry presented by a flat universe and allowed `normal' matter to prefer certain parts over other parts. Read the article next time.
Consider Texas A&M University
on
Dorm Storm?
·
· Score: 3, Informative
TAMU will be introducing 10,000 students to the dorms next week. All dorm rooms have two ethernet ports. When a student plugs in, they are taken to a registration page (regardless of their destination) where they can register their machine and assign a DNS hostname. They are then free to use the network.
One IP address per student is allowed. They can change their hostname at will. All configurations are done via DHCP, so any machine that can speak TCP/IP and DHCP are welcome on the ResNet.
http://cis.tamu.edu/help/resnet_registration.php 3 for somewhat up-to-date information (we will not be supporting the PH nameserver for more than afew weeks, hopefully).
If I have a GPL'd product from which someone else derives a work, and they release it under a non-GPL'd license, then, due to the license they agreed to in order to use my code in the fisrt place, their code is under the GPL even if they don't expressly say so. Therefore, I can use their code whereever I want. They are then responsible for bringing the suit. My defense is then my original code with it's license and proof that their work is derived from mine. Therefore, the burden is on them to defend their non-GPL license by court actions (similar to defending a trademark).
Why not everyone get together, compile an open (but controlled) database (similar to the cddb situation) and spontaneously replace internic? If nobody points their DNS to internic, it doesn't exist and we rid ourselves of NetworkSolutions. I have been trying to get changes through on a new domain since close to 19 May. No luck yet.
Also, if nobody challenges the notice at the bottom of the whois results soon, I don't think the courts will be disagreeing with it as much in the future.
Slashdot Mirror
This is a non-sequitor. The ionization caused the universe to be opaque. The creation of non-ionized matter (a lot of hydrogen and a little helium) allowed radiation to travel and the universe became transparent. We see the remenants of this as the microwave background. This has nothing to do with dark matter and gravitation. The dark matter merrily broke the symmetry presented by a flat universe and allowed `normal' matter to prefer certain parts over other parts. Read the article next time.
TAMU will be introducing 10,000 students to the dorms next week. All dorm rooms have two ethernet ports. When a student plugs in, they are taken to a registration page (regardless of their destination) where they can register their machine and assign a DNS hostname. They are then free to use the network.
p 3 for somewhat up-to-date information (we will not be supporting the PH nameserver for more than afew weeks, hopefully).
One IP address per student is allowed. They can change their hostname at will. All configurations are done via DHCP, so any machine that can speak TCP/IP and DHCP are welcome on the ResNet.
http://cis.tamu.edu/help/resnet_registration.ph
It's actually a quite simple module.
If I have a GPL'd product from which someone else derives a work, and they release it under a non-GPL'd license, then, due to the license they agreed to in order to use my code in the fisrt place, their code is under the GPL even if they don't expressly say so. Therefore, I can use their code whereever I want. They are then responsible for bringing the suit. My defense is then my original code with it's license and proof that their work is derived from mine. Therefore, the burden is on them to defend their non-GPL license by court actions (similar to defending a trademark).
Why not everyone get together, compile an open (but controlled) database (similar to the cddb situation) and spontaneously replace internic? If nobody points their DNS to internic, it doesn't exist and we rid ourselves of NetworkSolutions. I have been trying to get changes through on a new domain since close to 19 May. No luck yet.
Also, if nobody challenges the notice at the bottom of the whois results soon, I don't think the courts will be disagreeing with it as much in the future.