Not better, cheaper when your mission do not envolve the need of a very big cannon. And everyone forgets that the Super Tucano is an acrobat, it can easily dodge enemy fire and SAMs if having a good pilot.
The moment you enter the Game of Lawyers, you have already lost. The only sensible way to deal with lawyers and their aberrations is to kill them, bury a stake through the heart of them and bury their heads separated from the body, just for good measure.
"I've never seen a serious, credible libertarian advocate pure absolute 100% anarchy, just like I've never seen a serious, credible businessperson advocate 100%"
Depends on where you look. Here is the easiest thing to find people with "binary thinking", unable to think on compromise.
Uhh... Sorry, the retarded here is you and only you. Otherwise you would have understood from the beginning what kind of crimes I consider that must be heavily punished, or in your way of black-and-white thinking you even thought I'd be advocating death penalty for minor things like traffic violations and similar infractions?
Well well... Is very, very easy to say what you say in the security of a proper civilized city my friend... Try to live in an uncivilized city like São Paulo or Rio de Janeiro for a few years to see how your "rosy" view of the world will change quickly... As we say here to idiots like you, "Se acha que eles são coitadinhos então leve eles para a sua casa".
Giving you some context. The punishment must be greater than the crime, otherwise criminals will find it worth committing the crime. But that does not mean of course that the punishment should not be proportional to the size of the crime. But when your criminals are barbaric animals like here, only extreme punishments work, they just do not understand nothing less than heavy beatings or death.
Keep in mind that I have to live in a country where criminal behavior is the default (yep, a shitty place) and people like me are called suckers for insisting on respect the laws. Here they have no shame of committing crimes, that's why the need for harsh punishments.
Uh... I think I was not clear enough... I know all that you described, I went through all of these topics. What bothers me is that I have spent a good time memorizing something that I ended up using to nothing, and if I ever needed it I could just get a book about the topic (remember, I know the basics). I have spent too much time studying advanced mathematics when I could have given more attention to logic and more pratical day-to-day topics.
I also prefer to look for in a book when I have to deal with programming involving unusual mathematics. Usually you do not need to go through the full course (and brain-melting) when all you need is to understand a particular case for a particular use you are programming.
Hum... You are this dumb? Interesting. Repeat after me: Where is marked as a school zone, drive slow and cautious because children on the road are to be expected. Where is not marked as school zone, drive respecting the local speed limit and rules (or in another words, not a school zone). Is this hard?
Oh, a "smartass". If you want a version for dummies, it is "you think school areas always have set time to be effective, but here is not that way." I beg a thousand pardons if English is too crap to properly represent a complex sentence thought out and written in Portuguese.
Interesting... So I need to be speeding at 85 because "everyone is doing that", when the speed limit of the road is 55? present this argument to the police of my country and they will respond by seizing your driver's license and towing your car, at best.
Oh boy, another one with interpretation difficulties... To the point: The school zones here CAN NOT be deactivated, period. The problem is that always appears an idiot saying it can go running in the area because he would only need to drive slowly on the departure time of children, but at least in my country that is not true and for good reason (for one, you will never be sure you will not have children walking on the street at any time). Try to stop at 60km/h to avoid hitting a child and you WILL discover why you should drive slow in this situation.
Hummm... The official rules or your "rules of the road"? For your information in my country you must (by law) drive slowly when you are in a school zone, no matter if she is deactivated or not. More than a smart ass here tried to use your argument and as a result they took heavy fines
And here comes a "superdriver", AC of course... Boy, keep in mind that the Google cars are EXPERIMENTAL, that is, for very good reason they can not go around flying low as you think is "normal". And to be honest, if you are one of those who can not bear to drive slowly behind another car when it is necessary (lack of patience and lack of respect for others), you should not even be behind the wheel.
Slashdot Mirror
Place a F35 on a CAS mission and your F35 will return as metal confetti.
Not better, cheaper when your mission do not envolve the need of a very big cannon. And everyone forgets that the Super Tucano is an acrobat, it can easily dodge enemy fire and SAMs if having a good pilot.
You are out of luck. The new kids (the new generation of developers) thinks convenience is more important than security or stability.
" I guess I'm just not enough of an internet tough guy libertarian."
No, you are just one more clueless idiot. The "system" is not imperfect, is plain broken. On purpose.
The moment you enter the Game of Lawyers, you have already lost. The only sensible way to deal with lawyers and their aberrations is to kill them, bury a stake through the heart of them and bury their heads separated from the body, just for good measure.
"I've never seen a serious, credible libertarian advocate pure absolute 100% anarchy, just like I've never seen a serious, credible businessperson advocate 100%"
Depends on where you look. Here is the easiest thing to find people with "binary thinking", unable to think on compromise.
Uhh... Sorry, the retarded here is you and only you. Otherwise you would have understood from the beginning what kind of crimes I consider that must be heavily punished, or in your way of black-and-white thinking you even thought I'd be advocating death penalty for minor things like traffic violations and similar infractions?
As i already said before... If you think they deserve your compassion, then take them to your home.
Well well... Is very, very easy to say what you say in the security of a proper civilized city my friend... Try to live in an uncivilized city like São Paulo or Rio de Janeiro for a few years to see how your "rosy" view of the world will change quickly... As we say here to idiots like you, "Se acha que eles são coitadinhos então leve eles para a sua casa".
Giving you some context. The punishment must be greater than the crime, otherwise criminals will find it worth committing the crime. But that does not mean of course that the punishment should not be proportional to the size of the crime. But when your criminals are barbaric animals like here, only extreme punishments work, they just do not understand nothing less than heavy beatings or death.
In your country? Maybe. In my country? Many criminals here are nothing but stupid animals, incapable of live in a community.
Keep in mind that I have to live in a country where criminal behavior is the default (yep, a shitty place) and people like me are called suckers for insisting on respect the laws. Here they have no shame of committing crimes, that's why the need for harsh punishments.
Simply find them and kill them with extreme brutality.
My kingdom for a lander with a drill...
Uh... I think I was not clear enough ... I know all that you described, I went through all of these topics. What bothers me is that I have spent a good time memorizing something that I ended up using to nothing, and if I ever needed it I could just get a book about the topic (remember, I know the basics). I have spent too much time studying advanced mathematics when I could have given more attention to logic and more pratical day-to-day topics.
"regardless of the speed limit."
You will be jailed here if you think like this...
I also prefer to look for in a book when I have to deal with programming involving unusual mathematics. Usually you do not need to go through the full course (and brain-melting) when all you need is to understand a particular case for a particular use you are programming.
Hum... You are this dumb? Interesting. Repeat after me: Where is marked as a school zone, drive slow and cautious because children on the road are to be expected. Where is not marked as school zone, drive respecting the local speed limit and rules (or in another words, not a school zone). Is this hard?
Necessary or unnecessary, If the driver in front is driving slowly to respect the school zone then how you will drive fast, going over him smartass?
Oh, a "smartass". If you want a version for dummies, it is "you think school areas always have set time to be effective, but here is not that way." I beg a thousand pardons if English is too crap to properly represent a complex sentence thought out and written in Portuguese.
Interesting... So I need to be speeding at 85 because "everyone is doing that", when the speed limit of the road is 55? present this argument to the police of my country and they will respond by seizing your driver's license and towing your car, at best.
Oh boy, another one with interpretation difficulties... To the point: The school zones here CAN NOT be deactivated, period. The problem is that always appears an idiot saying it can go running in the area because he would only need to drive slowly on the departure time of children, but at least in my country that is not true and for good reason (for one, you will never be sure you will not have children walking on the street at any time). Try to stop at 60km/h to avoid hitting a child and you WILL discover why you should drive slow in this situation.
Hummm... The official rules or your "rules of the road"? For your information in my country you must (by law) drive slowly when you are in a school zone, no matter if she is deactivated or not. More than a smart ass here tried to use your argument and as a result they took heavy fines
And here comes a "superdriver", AC of course... Boy, keep in mind that the Google cars are EXPERIMENTAL, that is, for very good reason they can not go around flying low as you think is "normal". And to be honest, if you are one of those who can not bear to drive slowly behind another car when it is necessary (lack of patience and lack of respect for others), you should not even be behind the wheel.
Put the AI on a M1A2, problem solved :-)