they are only starting this, only a few games where checked. With time more requested games that fail to work will be picked up by valve and fix any wine issue or create the correct set of wine options... slowly those errors will disappear...
While most of the games have the Steam DRM, some do not, as long you download then, you can play then without any problem. If steam goes out of business, it should probably release a "permanent" DRM update, so users could still play installed games offline.
But do not worry, checking the profits per workers, valve have higher profits than apple, it is one of the most successful companies out there
If someone still uses sharepoint, he have no idea what is doing nor why, he just throw some money to a problem and hope it solved it. If it is mission critical, it should never use sharepoint !
LibreOffice do replace Ms Office for most people... Usually people hate the change because of usage habit, but it do replace without any problem... for those that do not replace, they can still use MS Office in linux, either via wine or just like in windows, via a browser in Office 365
So yes, you can use MS Office in linux if you really want to, it is again a usage habit problem
Again, that is the lazy solution, you can create a blocklist rule for more complex rules and send it to the client, you can break the url in blocks and hash then and again use the hash against your internal rules. Even if really needed, the host can always be a hash (break it if needed) and send only the plain uri without query-strings. This way user site access is protected and query-string data is protected. URI without those is less critical (but still can give lot of info on what the user is doing)
Yes, protecting the user privacy make things harder, but sending the full URL is very bad and can break trust, if not even illegal, as it can catch protected info that would be hidden via https. There are checks that must never be in the server side, that must be in the client side so the user privacy and data is protected.
bullshit talk or they do not understand enough about security to have a security add-on!
You do not need to send user url to a remote server, you hash the full url (or HOST and URI if you want both data) and send the hash. the remote server compare if that hash is in their DB or not and report back to the user about the result.
Sending the user data directly is either laziness, ignorance or malicious. Most of the time this happens is malicious, is to gather tracking info about users (even if anonymous, profiling on what people access is valued info for marketing)
what free world? the one there the president says that everything that he do not agree is fake news and boycott then (at least do not arrest then... for now), one where he fires everyone who disagree with him (even if he hire him a few months before saying he was perfect for the job), where he promises no wars but break a peace and anti-nuclear treaty because he wants to control the other country... and send all CAPS threats via twitter. Finally, the same president (administrative branch) that demands that the judicial branch to stop investigation about him? yes, that free world
its open source, you can check what it does from what i read, it will detect the block page, redirects the request to one proxy and send to their servers the url of the blocked page (to detect new blocked domains)
A more simple alternative is just use google, cloudflare or other external DNS, as this block is done in the dns
5 commits since last year (and only minor bug fixes), no new releases for 2 years... sorry to tell you, but "It's dead, Jim!"
Your only security protection is that is little known, but as it used webkit, you still get most of the same security bugs.... you are using a 2 years old chrome^W forget about it, webkit1 !! this is a many years old chrome.
Not saying that the design isn't useful, but the browser code is ancient... how useful and safe it is depends of what you use.
If this extension is easy to enable and disable, (or even better, using the firefox containers, "open tracking and suggestion tab"), i can use it to search for info and debuging, we could find new hidden gens line with stumbleupon
no, companies that are willing to pay to have mozilla promote their extensions... is up to you to install then or not.
most people trust mozilla in to protect your data, so any of those companies will either to have a good privacy policy or pay even more for mozilla to recommend then
Imagine facebook recomending this extension... would anybody trust it? now look at mozilla or FSF recommending some extension? the feeling is for sure different (more for some than others, but totally different from facebook)
actually you could wear a reflective camouflage, that is, normal camo pattern in a reflective vest... it would be the middle term between the two, it would reflect most of the laser, but still be hidden enough... unless the light conditions are exactly behind the shooter... from other angles, it would not make that difference from normal camouflage
The globe is not producing extra CO2, we are... Also, even if natural (a new ice age or a new warn age), it is a totally global change, that leads to the fall of many countries and regions, creating global instability and so famine, migrations, wars
Uf we can avoid all that by just investing in clean energy, it is a win-win situation
how to leave the Paris climate agreement in 2020 if you are not even there? that is not logic...do not worry, we all know that trump can't do logic, neither many of their followers, so it is easy to get confused!:D
On WW1, the USA army was a joke and New Zealand+Australian armies helped more, so did Canada, both with way smaller population. The USA enter late to the war (already after making big profits selling guns and ammo) and avoid fighting (almost unless forced), despite the big number of soldiers
On the WW2, again only entered late and only after being directly attacked... and again made huge profit with the war, with the British having a huge dept that was only totally paid around 2006. Despite Hollywood movies, europe war was won by russia, D day and allied attack only made the Germany bleed faster, but they already had lost the core of their army. So on the european battle ground the USA did help, but was not really critical... yes, europe would be under soviet influence... so much power and tech over the soviet side vs the USA was not something that the USA would like too (just think, no ballistic missile to the USA, but sooner to the URSS) On the pacifc battleground was where the USA was useful, but japan was playing in the USA back garden, so USA wasn't helping other countries, they were helping then-self.
If the USA didn't enter WW2, japan would control the pacific and asia, probably would attack russia back and maybe help a lot the nazi russia attack. Germany would win russia and the middle east, gaining the needed fuel and finally turn to the UK, already in a very weak position. With europe, middle east, asia and pacific, guess what country they would attack next. With lots of fuel, resources and slave labor, the USA would be in a very bad place to defend... and probably at that time, Mexico would join to the axis with the promises to recover texas, california and maybe more land... giving the foothold to attack the USA by land. Even with a atomic bomb, it would take years to produce more than those 3 bombs and nazis would then see that it could work and quickly would also build some. With the country being attacked, it would be harder to produce more bombs
Sorry break your dream, but while the USA was important in many places, it was not what Hollywood shows, they didn't won the war alone, far from it, and they were not the Europe and the rest of the world saviors, if they didn't entered the war, they would be the next target (either a reinforced Axis or URSS) and in a very bad position
Both china and india are improving, china is simply the faster grower in renewable energy production... Per capita, the USA is #7, but only because in the top are the middle east petrol producers, where petrol is cheaper than water... but their total emissions are way lower... even russia have lower per capita CO2 emissions and they produce petrol and gas!
All this and the US, the #2 in pollution, is lagging behind...
finally, india is in #4, behind the EU, so the USA really dwarfs everyone except china
Without pressure to develop cleaner energy sources, people would not do it, simply because anything new is more expensive than established and already paid... now that we have generated some pressure to change, wind energy is already much cheaper than coal and petrol, and a little more cheaper than gas. Each year solar prices are being cut in a big %. Energy storage, improving electric grid is also a side effect of this pressure to fix a problem.
Simply waiting for the problem to solve itself is a good way to not fix a problem.
and by the way, no economy output is decreased, while you reduce (dirty) established business output, you increase clean business output. Many countries now export clean energy production (like Denmark and Portugal) while they reduced their imported and dirty energy to the minimum and have now most of their energy from local and renewable sources.
Finally, no need to go to third world plastic dumping, EVERY country have that problem... but again without any pressure, people will still get many useless plastic items and dump then after one use and will not change to more alternative and more expensive items
yes, CO2 is good for plans... but that it is not its only effect... how many plants you have in Venus? They have LOTS of CO2 there! the quantity is very important, too much or too little are bad, just like water (too little: desert, too much... well sea or lake) The issue with CO2 is that it gets hot and do not release the hot as fast as most other common gases. This make everything a *little* more hot... while the extra CO2 make plans grow faster, it also make water evaporate faster, that in turn form bigger clouds and so stronger storms...usually far away from the water was taken out... so you get longer or permanent dry seasons in some places and floods and strong cyclones. As some areas are hotter and other cooler, winds also change a little, taking hot air from hot places to places where usually is not that hot, and taking cold air to places where usually is not that cold... the planet will sooner or later get back to a "normal" weather cycle, but may be totally different from what we have now, so killing many animals and plants (species extinction) and destroying lots of land, forcing people to relocate, migrate... current food cultures will have to change, sparking for hunger if not changed correctly or too late.
The fun fact about chain reactions is that after they started, it is hard to predict how they will evolve, small details may make huge differences in the long run... and like most chain reactions, it may not be easy to stop or control then... venus is a great example of a global warming out of control, while mercuryis much closer to the sun, it is colder than venus: https://www.universetoday.com/...
But we have weather station all over the globe and many of then have public info... just go look and take the numbers, do the math and then come back to us if there isn't a small and persistent global temperature increase
hey, you can do your own solar panels... and wind generators... and (much more cleaner than coal) gas generators you can also do cars that uses less petrol, just like all other cars in the world
Slashdot Mirror
they are only starting this, only a few games where checked. With time more requested games that fail to work will be picked up by valve and fix any wine issue or create the correct set of wine options... slowly those errors will disappear ...
of course, not all games will work, but most will
While most of the games have the Steam DRM, some do not, as long you download then, you can play then without any problem.
If steam goes out of business, it should probably release a "permanent" DRM update, so users could still play installed games offline.
But do not worry, checking the profits per workers, valve have higher profits than apple, it is one of the most successful companies out there
If someone still uses sharepoint, he have no idea what is doing nor why, he just throw some money to a problem and hope it solved it. If it is mission critical, it should never use sharepoint !
LibreOffice do replace Ms Office for most people... Usually people hate the change because of usage habit, but it do replace without any problem... for those that do not replace, they can still use MS Office in linux, either via wine or just like in windows, via a browser in Office 365
So yes, you can use MS Office in linux if you really want to, it is again a usage habit problem
Again, that is the lazy solution, you can create a blocklist rule for more complex rules and send it to the client, you can break the url in blocks and hash then and again use the hash against your internal rules. Even if really needed, the host can always be a hash (break it if needed) and send only the plain uri without query-strings. This way user site access is protected and query-string data is protected. URI without those is less critical (but still can give lot of info on what the user is doing)
Yes, protecting the user privacy make things harder, but sending the full URL is very bad and can break trust, if not even illegal, as it can catch protected info that would be hidden via https. There are checks that must never be in the server side, that must be in the client side so the user privacy and data is protected.
bullshit talk or they do not understand enough about security to have a security add-on!
You do not need to send user url to a remote server, you hash the full url (or HOST and URI if you want both data) and send the hash. the remote server compare if that hash is in their DB or not and report back to the user about the result.
Sending the user data directly is either laziness, ignorance or malicious. Most of the time this happens is malicious, is to gather tracking info about users (even if anonymous, profiling on what people access is valued info for marketing)
who cares about windows, linux runs fine! :D
what free world? the one there the president says that everything that he do not agree is fake news and boycott then (at least do not arrest then... for now), one where he fires everyone who disagree with him (even if he hire him a few months before saying he was perfect for the job), where he promises no wars but break a peace and anti-nuclear treaty because he wants to control the other country... and send all CAPS threats via twitter. Finally, the same president (administrative branch) that demands that the judicial branch to stop investigation about him? yes, that free world
Pro tip: they are all the same
yes, because the US also do not have any satellite destroying weapons too (please ignore that little secret satellite and those ground-space missiles)
its open source, you can check what it does
from what i read, it will detect the block page, redirects the request to one proxy and send to their servers the url of the blocked page (to detect new blocked domains)
A more simple alternative is just use google, cloudflare or other external DNS, as this block is done in the dns
5 commits since last year (and only minor bug fixes), no new releases for 2 years... sorry to tell you, but "It's dead, Jim!"
Your only security protection is that is little known, but as it used webkit, you still get most of the same security bugs.... you are using a 2 years old chrome^W forget about it, webkit1 !! this is a many years old chrome.
Not saying that the design isn't useful, but the browser code is ancient... how useful and safe it is depends of what you use.
+1 to this!
If this extension is easy to enable and disable, (or even better, using the firefox containers, "open tracking and suggestion tab"), i can use it to search for info and debuging, we could find new hidden gens line with stumbleupon
no, companies that are willing to pay to have mozilla promote their extensions... is up to you to install then or not.
most people trust mozilla in to protect your data, so any of those companies will either to have a good privacy policy or pay even more for mozilla to recommend then
Imagine facebook recomending this extension... would anybody trust it? now look at mozilla or FSF recommending some extension? the feeling is for sure different (more for some than others, but totally different from facebook)
*ALL CA* are a single point of failure, it is not just let's encrypt
actually you could wear a reflective camouflage, that is, normal camo pattern in a reflective vest ... it would be the middle term between the two, it would reflect most of the laser, but still be hidden enough ... unless the light conditions are exactly behind the shooter... from other angles, it would not make that difference from normal camouflage
The globe is not producing extra CO2, we are...
Also, even if natural (a new ice age or a new warn age), it is a totally global change, that leads to the fall of many countries and regions, creating global instability and so famine, migrations, wars
Uf we can avoid all that by just investing in clean energy, it is a win-win situation
there is no spoon^^^treaty, it is a agreement! :D
bingo!
how to leave the Paris climate agreement in 2020 if you are not even there? that is not logic ...do not worry, we all know that trump can't do logic, neither many of their followers, so it is easy to get confused! :D
with arguments like yours, i must be wrong for sure! :D
On WW1, the USA army was a joke and New Zealand+Australian armies helped more, so did Canada, both with way smaller population.
The USA enter late to the war (already after making big profits selling guns and ammo) and avoid fighting (almost unless forced), despite the big number of soldiers
On the WW2, again only entered late and only after being directly attacked... and again made huge profit with the war, with the British having a huge dept that was only totally paid around 2006. Despite Hollywood movies, europe war was won by russia, D day and allied attack only made the Germany bleed faster, but they already had lost the core of their army. So on the european battle ground the USA did help, but was not really critical... yes, europe would be under soviet influence... so much power and tech over the soviet side vs the USA was not something that the USA would like too (just think, no ballistic missile to the USA, but sooner to the URSS)
On the pacifc battleground was where the USA was useful, but japan was playing in the USA back garden, so USA wasn't helping other countries, they were helping then-self.
If the USA didn't enter WW2, japan would control the pacific and asia, probably would attack russia back and maybe help a lot the nazi russia attack. Germany would win russia and the middle east, gaining the needed fuel and finally turn to the UK, already in a very weak position. With europe, middle east, asia and pacific, guess what country they would attack next. With lots of fuel, resources and slave labor, the USA would be in a very bad place to defend... and probably at that time, Mexico would join to the axis with the promises to recover texas, california and maybe more land... giving the foothold to attack the USA by land. Even with a atomic bomb, it would take years to produce more than those 3 bombs and nazis would then see that it could work and quickly would also build some. With the country being attacked, it would be harder to produce more bombs
Sorry break your dream, but while the USA was important in many places, it was not what Hollywood shows, they didn't won the war alone, far from it, and they were not the Europe and the rest of the world saviors, if they didn't entered the war, they would be the next target (either a reinforced Axis or URSS) and in a very bad position
Both china and india are improving, china is simply the faster grower in renewable energy production... Per capita, the USA is #7, but only because in the top are the middle east petrol producers, where petrol is cheaper than water... but their total emissions are way lower... even russia have lower per capita CO2 emissions and they produce petrol and gas!
All this and the US, the #2 in pollution, is lagging behind...
finally, india is in #4, behind the EU, so the USA really dwarfs everyone except china
Without pressure to develop cleaner energy sources, people would not do it, simply because anything new is more expensive than established and already paid... now that we have generated some pressure to change, wind energy is already much cheaper than coal and petrol, and a little more cheaper than gas. Each year solar prices are being cut in a big %. Energy storage, improving electric grid is also a side effect of this pressure to fix a problem.
Simply waiting for the problem to solve itself is a good way to not fix a problem.
and by the way, no economy output is decreased, while you reduce (dirty) established business output, you increase clean business output. Many countries now export clean energy production (like Denmark and Portugal) while they reduced their imported and dirty energy to the minimum and have now most of their energy from local and renewable sources.
Finally, no need to go to third world plastic dumping, EVERY country have that problem... but again without any pressure, people will still get many useless plastic items and dump then after one use and will not change to more alternative and more expensive items
yes, CO2 is good for plans... but that it is not its only effect... how many plants you have in Venus? They have LOTS of CO2 there! ...usually far away from the water was taken out... so you get longer or permanent dry seasons in some places and floods and strong cyclones. As some areas are hotter and other cooler, winds also change a little, taking hot air from hot places to places where usually is not that hot, and taking cold air to places where usually is not that cold... the planet will sooner or later get back to a "normal" weather cycle, but may be totally different from what we have now, so killing many animals and plants (species extinction) and destroying lots of land, forcing people to relocate, migrate... current food cultures will have to change, sparking for hunger if not changed correctly or too late.
the quantity is very important, too much or too little are bad, just like water (too little: desert, too much... well sea or lake)
The issue with CO2 is that it gets hot and do not release the hot as fast as most other common gases. This make everything a *little* more hot... while the extra CO2 make plans grow faster, it also make water evaporate faster, that in turn form bigger clouds and so stronger storms
The fun fact about chain reactions is that after they started, it is hard to predict how they will evolve, small details may make huge differences in the long run... and like most chain reactions, it may not be easy to stop or control then... venus is a great example of a global warming out of control, while mercuryis much closer to the sun, it is colder than venus: https://www.universetoday.com/...
Yes, sure, you know more than NASA: https://climate.nasa.gov/vital...
But we have weather station all over the globe and many of then have public info... just go look and take the numbers, do the math and then come back to us if there isn't a small and persistent global temperature increase
hey, you can do your own solar panels... and wind generators... and (much more cleaner than coal) gas generators
you can also do cars that uses less petrol, just like all other cars in the world