That's a weird argument considering considering Microsoft just starting charging a WAD to 'upgrade' from XP to Vista. The latter moved users a generation backwards. Should Snow Leopard prove to be speedier or more graphically aesthetic, I wouldn't hesitate to pay $20. No OS author claims their software is perfect as-is when published. It's always logical to assume that advances will be made.
It's already hard to believe Snow Leopard could be any more stable than Leopard (which is already lightyears more stable than Win XPsp3).
Slashdot Mirror
That's a weird argument considering considering Microsoft just starting charging a WAD to 'upgrade' from XP to Vista. The latter moved users a generation backwards. Should Snow Leopard prove to be speedier or more graphically aesthetic, I wouldn't hesitate to pay $20. No OS author claims their software is perfect as-is when published. It's always logical to assume that advances will be made. It's already hard to believe Snow Leopard could be any more stable than Leopard (which is already lightyears more stable than Win XPsp3).