The original intent had Congress creating laws, the President executing laws and the Judiciary interpreting the laws.
Each part has it's place and there is a method of oversight for each part.
Congress should not be executing or reinterpreting laws. The Judiciary should not be executing or creating laws. And the Executive should not be creating or interpreting laws.
If congress is reinterpreting a law they passed, it should be rewritten to remove the alternate interpretation.
A sitting judge should not have fiat over methods of the execution of laws. This would be close to setting up a monarchy in the court system.
This is a case of a law that has a few different interpretations. And congress is reevaluating the law.
Slashdot Mirror
The original intent had Congress creating laws, the President executing laws and the Judiciary interpreting the laws.
Each part has it's place and there is a method of oversight for each part.
Congress should not be executing or reinterpreting laws. The Judiciary should not be executing or creating laws. And the Executive should not be creating or interpreting laws.
If congress is reinterpreting a law they passed, it should be rewritten to remove the alternate interpretation.
A sitting judge should not have fiat over methods of the execution of laws. This would be close to setting up a monarchy in the court system.
This is a case of a law that has a few different interpretations. And congress is reevaluating the law.