The thing you are missing is the traffic level. The peering agreements are, in theory, setup for mutual traffic levels.
Since one is sending 3 times the amount of data (assuming this is true from article) they think its not fair and should be compensated for the increased amount of traffic.
Sounds like they could have a case, if the traffic levels are really that skewed.
Slashdot Mirror
The thing you are missing is the traffic level.
The peering agreements are, in theory, setup for mutual traffic levels.
Since one is sending 3 times the amount of data (assuming this is true from article) they think its not fair and should be compensated for the increased amount of traffic.
Sounds like they could have a case, if the traffic levels are really that skewed.