Electric cars are the only ones with legitimate complaints about current battery tech. Consumer electronics suffers from metrosexual marketing departments trying to turn everything into a fashion accessory, and not putting a decent amount of battery, as in mass and volume.
Haskell is a more reasonable code generation target - it has a nice optimizing compiler and implements a decent runtime, plus C FFI, plus recognizable errors, plus portability between compilers, without sacrificing features.
Frankly I think you are right on all counts. The languages on the left are useless. The ones on the right sadly didn't make it despite technical superiority.
Running 7.0.1 with over 50 add-ons. Non-deterministic swap IO chocking, less often freezes, most often exit without saying a thing. 1.4GHz Celeron M, 2x256MB DDR1 RAM, 40GB 5.4krpm PATA drive, 6y.o. laptop, Arch linux, -pf branch kernel i686 microarch optimizations, Xfce4 vanilla.
What the hell is Women's Studies? I'd say most women (a.k.a. neurotic psychological tanks of the cheap Russian kind of construction) need therapy to get in sync with their gender role, and not education. (Note:I'm not a sexist, I just think it's sickening that psychological gender roles are being blurred so much as these days.)
Spectrum is property of the people, not the military. Short range VHF terrestrial localization will be used in cities. The base stations will be far away other places.
ZFS gives COW on the fs level, along with versioning and free snapshots. Cheap ATAoE SAN enclosures are available. There is no difference in the drive controller or the storage mechanism itself between SATA and SAS disks. It's only firmware, and provided that the consumer class firmware doesn't lie too much, you won't have to even buy RAID edition drives (that's SATA - SAS is pointless in it self). Now, rpms, data density, platter size - those are performance parameters. They have nothing to do with the external bus.
FFS, please don't maintain the inertia. Ada would look good on your resume, right? May I remind you where the single source of all segfaults is: C[++].
Dragon chip has x86 acceleration instructions, not a full implementation, and they take 5% of die space. Second, ever try to design a superscalar decoder for x86? The hardware implemented algorithms become large and complicated, but in the real estate budget it goes under the heading superscalar decoder, and not x86 support.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, with even less range, and plenty of maintenance.
Uhhhh, I didn't see any objective drawbacks except that it didn't sound like a V8. Typical american consumers.
Electric cars are the only ones with legitimate complaints about current battery tech. Consumer electronics suffers from metrosexual marketing departments trying to turn everything into a fashion accessory, and not putting a decent amount of battery, as in mass and volume.
Except batteries, power electronics, electric motors... Minor stuff.
Haskell is a more reasonable code generation target - it has a nice optimizing compiler and implements a decent runtime, plus C FFI, plus recognizable errors, plus portability between compilers, without sacrificing features.
Frankly I think you are right on all counts. The languages on the left are useless. The ones on the right sadly didn't make it despite technical superiority.
Is GCC Win32 code that suboptimal? Can it be fixed? Could someone please educate me?
Running 7.0.1 with over 50 add-ons. Non-deterministic swap IO chocking, less often freezes, most often exit without saying a thing. 1.4GHz Celeron M, 2x256MB DDR1 RAM, 40GB 5.4krpm PATA drive, 6y.o. laptop, Arch linux, -pf branch kernel i686 microarch optimizations, Xfce4 vanilla.
Problem is the 64-bit version of the tool-chain generates XP SP2+ code.
Ctrl+/ is too much? Frankly I'm happy for the vertical space. What I want is a more aggressive GC.
What the hell is Women's Studies? I'd say most women (a.k.a. neurotic psychological tanks of the cheap Russian kind of construction) need therapy to get in sync with their gender role, and not education. (Note:I'm not a sexist, I just think it's sickening that psychological gender roles are being blurred so much as these days.)
Spectrum is property of the people, not the military. Short range VHF terrestrial localization will be used in cities. The base stations will be far away other places.
You forgot microsoft.
Do a switcharroo. The if they aren't using it, they won't notice it's smaller.
Stephen Bakster's trilogy referenced stone flowers that bloom once in a thousand years on the moon, or something of the sort.
You are simply implementing ECN by hand.
ECN exists. It works. Just like S/MIME. And similarly, no one uses it.
ZFS gives COW on the fs level, along with versioning and free snapshots. Cheap ATAoE SAN enclosures are available. There is no difference in the drive controller or the storage mechanism itself between SATA and SAS disks. It's only firmware, and provided that the consumer class firmware doesn't lie too much, you won't have to even buy RAID edition drives (that's SATA - SAS is pointless in it self). Now, rpms, data density, platter size - those are performance parameters. They have nothing to do with the external bus.
FFS, please don't maintain the inertia. Ada would look good on your resume, right? May I remind you where the single source of all segfaults is: C[++].
Dragon chip has x86 acceleration instructions, not a full implementation, and they take 5% of die space. Second, ever try to design a superscalar decoder for x86? The hardware implemented algorithms become large and complicated, but in the real estate budget it goes under the heading superscalar decoder, and not x86 support.
Except for heavy DSP work. Something tells me Alcatel-Lucent are gonna have some new friends.
Kudos for the troll. I barely watch the thing, and was about to correct you.
When are they planning on migrating to IPv6?
My AK-47 begs to differ.
Doh! s/DMV/DMZ/