So one company decides to make a closed source version of Linux with their own enhancements. So what? That doesn't stop other people making their own enhancements that do equivalent things.
Therein lies one of the benefits of the GPL to big business: with the GPL the enhancement need only be developed once.
Actually, the Clams are required by CO$ to install a special filter on their browser
This is totally untrue. Whilst I believe there is such a filter in existence, it is NOT mandatory for Scientologists to have this filter installed on their machines.
CO$ wouldn't want to let the poor little drones think for themselves
Contrary to popular opinion, Scientologists are encouraged to think for themselves.
I know - I am a Scientologist and I have no such filter installed nor have I been asked to install one.
Slashdot Mirror
Therein lies one of the benefits of the GPL to big business: with the GPL the enhancement need only be developed once.
It encourages cooperation.
Ronny
It does. See here:
# c66
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44863
Unfortunately, there's no UI for this functionality yet.
Ronny
evisa.com was registered first according to whois.
Where does that leave us?
Ronny
Actually, the Clams are required by CO$ to install a special filter on their browser
This is totally untrue. Whilst I believe there is such a filter in existence, it is NOT mandatory for Scientologists to have this filter installed on their machines.
CO$ wouldn't want to let the poor little drones think for themselves
Contrary to popular opinion, Scientologists are encouraged to think for themselves.
I know - I am a Scientologist and I have no such filter installed nor have I been asked to install one.