Slashdot Mirror


User: smash

smash's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
7,084
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 7,084

  1. Re:Yes Yay, Celebrate the Competition on Google Chrome Becomes World's No. 1 Browser · · Score: 2

    Yup, IE9 is decent. No maybe it is not the fastest browser out there. But as a baseline that you know will be installed sooner or later by most Windows users, it is good. It renders things fast enough, has hardware accelerated graphics, can be secured fairly well.

    I have no major problems using IE9 on PC, Safari on my Mac, and Firefox on my *nix installs. They're all "good enoough".

  2. Re:Yay? on Google Chrome Becomes World's No. 1 Browser · · Score: 1

    As do I. Sadly though, people see "Apple" and think "iTunes on the PC is shithouse" and ignore it. Safari is good.

  3. Re:But what are the weekday numbers like? on Google Chrome Becomes World's No. 1 Browser · · Score: 1

    Outsourcing to india is so last decade. It will be india outsourcing phone support to the US before too long.

  4. Re:Superior browser on Google Chrome Becomes World's No. 1 Browser · · Score: 1

    What he said basically. I used Firefox since it was called Phoenix, and they totally lost the plot several years ago. There are plenty of other better options out there than both Chrome OR firefox, it's a shame people don't bother with them.

  5. Re:Well deserved on Google Chrome Becomes World's No. 1 Browser · · Score: 2

    Chrome works just fine on my Pentium D from 2004. In Windows 7. It works just fine in virtual machines with 512mb of RAM running XP. Snappy, in fact. If chrome doesn't work for you either your hardware is WAY out of date, under spec or you have malware.

    I don't run it any more due to the total lack of trust I have in Google, but the browser performs well, regardless.

  6. hmmm on Google Chrome Becomes World's No. 1 Browser · · Score: 1

    Giving up IE, which is merely insecure, for Chrome which actively tracks you. Sigh.

    In a post-webkit (and Opera!) world, there are plenty of other really great options out there, and I really think it is important that we push other browsers, other search engines, other blog services etc to prevent Google cementing their strangehold on virtually all facets of the online experience.

    Go experiment with other search engines. Go try a different browser. Try living without google for a day. Because otherwise if they ever turn evil (whether or not they already are is open to debate), we're fucked.

  7. Re:yes but... on Linux 3.4 Released · · Score: 1

    Sarcasm detection FAIL

  8. Re:Most programs don't need a 64-bit address space on Linux 3.4 Released · · Score: 1

    History has shown that CPU speed scales much faster than programmer speed. History has also shown that people can't write secure code, thus giving up ASLR is a bad thing.

  9. Re:What do you mean, "now" starting? on Programming — Now Starting In Elementary School · · Score: 1

    Ditti. We started with LOGO...

  10. Re:Most programs don't need a 64-bit address space on Linux 3.4 Released · · Score: 1

    I very much doubt the former "wins" at all. Code is far, far smaller than data it operates on, which has nothing to do with pointer size or register size causing increased footprint. 2 systems is ambiguous and enables applications to be written for the wrong security model. Just compile everything for x64 and be done with it.

  11. Re:Most programs don't need a 64-bit address space on Linux 3.4 Released · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You've seen the prices of 16+ GB of ram recently, right? Shaving a few bytes here and there in your CODE (not in your data, which is far and away larger) by writing for 32 bit pointer use in the days where 16GB of ram is under a hundred bucks is retarded.

  12. Re:Yes, 3.4 BUT... on Linux 3.4 Released · · Score: 0

    I don't think you can call it "rock solid" just yet, it hasn't even been out a week, let alone the few months to be considered even "stable"... Rock solid = years of uptime.

  13. Re:They fix the sound bullshit yet? on Linux 3.4 Released · · Score: 0

    FreeBSD already did. OSS. One day Linux will dump the pulse related crap and things will come full circle.

  14. Re:yes but... on Linux 3.4 Released · · Score: 0

    Why do you need audio playback on a typical desktop? For laptop users like me, saving all audio related watts by using my portable music player means better battery life.

  15. Re:yes but... on Linux 3.4 Released · · Score: 0

    Try FreeBSD instead. Or PC-BSD, which is essentially FreeBSD with a fancy installer.

  16. Re:btrfs needed the work on Linux 3.4 Released · · Score: 1

    This sort of application thinking is retarded. If the OS crashes, it is an OS problem. Firefox (which being a browser stores SFA that needs to be permanent) should not be forcing sync in the fear that the OS crashes. Let the cache work as intended, don't cripple it because the user is retarded or the underlying OS is crap.

    If the underlying OS is crap and causing data corruption due to crashing with outstanding cached writes, then the OS is broken and needs to be fixed. NOT the browser.

  17. block /protocol/ ! on Wil Wheaton: BitTorrent Isn't Only For Piracy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Email, IRC, HTTP, HTTPS, NNTP and DNS all need to be banned, as they can be used to distribute illegal content!

  18. Re:Hate to put a damper on the celebration on Diablo III Released · · Score: 1

    Torchlight held my interest for about 2 hrs, tops. It doesn't look anywhere near as good as D3, and the character classes just didn't engage me at all.

  19. Re:Hate to put a damper on the celebration on Diablo III Released · · Score: 1

    Blizzard go belly up? Hah. If they put only 5-10% of their monthly WOW income in the bank they'll have a war-chest able to sustain them for a very long time. Never mind any new products they produce.

  20. Re:Hate to put a damper on the celebration on Diablo III Released · · Score: 1

    ... plus any countries that have bought into the "free trade agreement" BS.

  21. Re:Not related on Mac Clone Maker Saga Ends As SCOTUS Denies Appeal · · Score: 1

    Newsflash: You don't purchase software. You purchase a LICENSE to run software which may be revoked by violating the terms of the license.

  22. Re:Not related on Mac Clone Maker Saga Ends As SCOTUS Denies Appeal · · Score: 1

    Running third party software on your hardware is entirely different to running software on third party unlicensed hardware.

  23. Re:Dropping the GPL ~= worse. on FreeBSD 10 To Use Clang Compiler, Deprecate GCC · · Score: 1

    Is it really so much to ask that the legacy compiler they leave behind for compatibility reasons actually be compatible?

    Due to licensing changes, apple are unable/unwilling to bundle newer versions. So maybe it is too much?

  24. Re:Not giving up anything, and the gain is larger on Geekbench Confirms Ivy Bridge MacBook Pro and iMac · · Score: 1

    I agree to an extent. But for me, gigabit ethernet is something I (as a minority) really do want, without needing a dongle (irrespective of whether it is thunderbolt or USB3, it is still another thing to get lost/forgotten/etc).

    But, as you say, thunderbolt opens up all sorts of possibilities - fibre channel, 10gig-e, etc. And I'd certainy understand the reasoning, if they were to drop as an internal connector.

  25. Re:Not giving up anything, and the gain is larger on Geekbench Confirms Ivy Bridge MacBook Pro and iMac · · Score: 1

    I'm hoping they keep gig-e on the pro machines, but realistically most of the time it is ever used is when you're at your desk. i.e., plugged into your thunderbolt display, which has gig-e. Why carry the port around all the time when you're away from your desk.

    At least no doubt that is the theory, if it disappears.