But Apple just had a resurgence of sales. While Android's sales have been constantly going up, Apple experiences lulls between major platform releases. Sure Apple sold almost as many IOS devices as Android did *this quarter*, but how about last quarter? Or before that?
I'm a student at GMU, and I had no idea that we made zotero. I always did find it strange that it was (on of the few extensions) installed on the school's computers....
SSL has NOTHING (read it again:NOTHING) to do with BGP peering sessions.
No, but it has a lot to do with the consequences of hijacked BGP peering sessions. Most other people got it.
No it doesn't. SSL doesn't sign, account for, o care about the AS path used to reach a destination. Traffic passing through a 'compromised' AS path has the same properties as those passing through a 'legit' path. mis-understood crypto is a risk no matter what path it goes through (unless you control the ENTIRE end-to-end). Complaining about a general problem (mostly out of context) and then acting smug doesn't make you look smarter. Make sure you know what you're talking about if you want to call me out.
Slashdot Mirror
Puppet is usually the right answer :)
http://ubietylab.net/ubigraph/
But Apple just had a resurgence of sales. While Android's sales have been constantly going up, Apple experiences lulls between major platform releases. Sure Apple sold almost as many IOS devices as Android did *this quarter*, but how about last quarter? Or before that?
Isn't this just the sort of thing that SDL is for?
I have a great idea for a blog post! I just need to get it slashdotted...
I'm a student at GMU, and I had no idea that we made zotero. I always did find it strange that it was (on of the few extensions) installed on the school's computers....
No, but it has a lot to do with the consequences of hijacked BGP peering sessions. Most other people got it.
No it doesn't. SSL doesn't sign, account for, o care about the AS path used to reach a destination. Traffic passing through a 'compromised' AS path has the same properties as those passing through a 'legit' path. mis-understood crypto is a risk no matter what path it goes through (unless you control the ENTIRE end-to-end). Complaining about a general problem (mostly out of context) and then acting smug doesn't make you look smarter. Make sure you know what you're talking about if you want to call me out.
SSL has NOTHING (read it again:NOTHING) to do with BGP peering sessions.