The problem is that they first must prove that IBM has done what they are accused of. The licence between SCO and IBM does not allow for SCO to withdraw their licence on a whim. They claim that IBM has violated the licence, but until that's been proved, they have no right to withdraw anything. IBM is still going to sell AIX on june 14. and beyond. If they case haven't been resolved before then, something I doubt unfortunately.
The shareholders, or at least those who are wise enough to sell before the stocks plummet. For some reason the anouncement that they was going to sue IBM had some posistive(!) impact on their stock value. Makes you wonder what stockbroker are using for intelligence:)
Slashdot Mirror
The problem is that they first must prove that IBM has done what they are accused of. The licence between SCO and IBM does not allow for SCO to withdraw their licence on a whim. They claim that IBM has violated the licence, but until that's been proved, they have no right to withdraw anything.
IBM is still going to sell AIX on june 14. and beyond. If they case haven't been resolved before then, something I doubt unfortunately.