that took 36 hours to compile. We alwaya ran it on mondayd. SO: Arrive: 8:00 Meeting 8:15 to 8:30 Start compile 8:35 Take long lunches, and have long nerd discussions. Weds. Morning, review log. Thurs-Fri Make fixes.
We could have had another system and done other work for 3k a pop, but no. It was too expensive.
"And if you look at the property taxes paid by the employees that would otherwise not have been paid, it is probably a wash anyway." specious reasoning. A typical logical fallacy used by large business to sound scary and make politician feel like the did something.
The 90% of the 60s was for people making over 10 million dollars.(73 MIllion in today's dollars) today 34% - 56% drop 70% for 1 million 7.3 million today 34% - 36% drop
100K in 1962 30% today - 21% 9% drop.
I like how just removing 56% tax over night is OK, but putting it back is scary bad. So we should go back to 1962 taxes adjusted for inflation. The Working rich will still make more in this country then they can in any other country.
Also, lets either cap home price value adjustment or remove the tax deduction. It's only used to convince people they can afford a home that they can not afford, and stop giving deduction for children for anyone make over 25K
And believe me, this will impact my income, a lot.
"If you start a massive debt reduction, you'll suck huge amounts of base money supply out of the economy" Well, that's going to happen. It can happen in a collapse or it can happen in a controlled way. The piper is coming to call.
The top 1% paid 35% of the tax(2011), and not 70%, and they pay less in all other taxes. Look at this: http://qz.com/74271/income-tax...
See home far down the 500+ income tax as dropped compared to every one else?
The should go back to the 1966 rate.
Frankly, I thing all income over 10 Million should be taxed at 90% Also, business should only be allowed to write off employee pay and RnD, and taxed at 100% for profit over a billion dollars.
And no, that isn't economic socialism, as defined in the last 100 or so year; which is a post-capitalism version of socialism.
"The brain isn't just a random mass of interconnected neurons" no shit? herp derp.
We have simulated 'large' number of neurons, and you know what happens? it begins to act like a brain. Granted we are talkaing some pretty basic signalling
Expanding beyond that is pricey, power intensive, and take a lot of power. Did I mention the power?
we will not understand the brain, and then build a simulator. We will build it up a bit at a time and use the brain as a model.
It will kill the eCurrency market. You can't hide secrets from the future with math, and something this powerful will change that game. Yes, 9000 time faster on 1 PC will still take a 100 million years. but on 10 million of these thing sitting in a farm from a non-favored nation?
They have already simulated brain response on a small set of of simulate neurons connection, just with what we use now it would take a vase machine to scale it up, this, OTOH mean they can put it to practice really soon.
3.5 in 1984. 400K. Of course, the Mac wasn't exactly a a large market share so it's no surprise not a lot of people would remember they had a floppy.
3.5 didn't really get into wide release until early 90s. I think we where still putting both in new non Apple system in 93-94. (The Mac was a PC by parlance of the time) Now if you excuse me I need to get a new onion for my belt.
What dream world do you live in? Or are you saying we need to mandate passengers do that? It's a bunch of crap.
I can stop talking and put the phone down. If the the person keeps talking, it doesn't matter.
"so you focus more on the phone than a person sitting next to you to get the same level of understanding" Did you think about that at all? Or when driving do you star at your passengers?
It seems to my in your case, having a passenger is too much of a distraction.
"There's a long list of reasons that a phone call is different from a passenger." None of which has been actually shown to distract any more then having a passenger, or kids, or the radio, or a blond in a convertible drive by..
Since there is no ACTUAL data saying talking on the phone actually make the driver worse, why would you say that? All data, that I could find as of 12/1/2013 was all based on 1 paper where the number was an assumption based on someones ass.
When you pound your meat hooks in a vain attempt to find a study that backs your narrative, be sure to read it in it's entirety,and look at where it's getting it's information.
Slashdot Mirror
I understand your point, but it is being done in your home, so you can control that aspect of the health.
And having restaurant at a fixed location would make more money with the health code.
that took 36 hours to compile. We alwaya ran it on mondayd.
SO:
Arrive: 8:00
Meeting 8:15 to 8:30
Start compile 8:35
Take long lunches, and have long nerd discussions.
Weds. Morning, review log.
Thurs-Fri Make fixes.
We could have had another system and done other work for 3k a pop, but no. It was too expensive.
Bean counters. SHeeesh.
it's about being there and being a special snowflake.
They are different in that they take their job serious, and they take the US citizens as citizens.
It's not a dept, it's an agency. These are distinct things.
"And if you look at the property taxes paid by the employees that would otherwise not have been paid, it is probably a wash anyway."
specious reasoning. A typical logical fallacy used by large business to sound scary and make politician feel like the did something.
I can't find anything that say there ere zero dollar in the pension fund in 2001.
there s no debate, trickle doesn't doesn't work.
The 90% of the 60s was for people making over 10 million dollars.(73 MIllion in today's dollars) today 34% - 56% drop
70% for 1 million 7.3 million today 34% - 36% drop
100K in 1962 30% today - 21% 9% drop.
I like how just removing 56% tax over night is OK, but putting it back is scary bad.
So we should go back to 1962 taxes adjusted for inflation. The Working rich will still make more in this country then they can in any other country.
Also, lets either cap home price value adjustment or remove the tax deduction. It's only used to convince people they can afford a home that they can not afford, and stop giving deduction for children for anyone make over 25K
And believe me, this will impact my income, a lot.
"If you start a massive debt reduction, you'll suck huge amounts of base money supply out of the economy"
Well, that's going to happen. It can happen in a collapse or it can happen in a controlled way. The piper is coming to call.
Who gets out of paying their taxes?
The top 1% paid 35% of the tax(2011), and not 70%, and they pay less in all other taxes.
Look at this:
http://qz.com/74271/income-tax...
See home far down the 500+ income tax as dropped compared to every one else?
The should go back to the 1966 rate.
Frankly, I thing all income over 10 Million should be taxed at 90%
Also, business should only be allowed to write off employee pay and RnD, and taxed at 100% for profit over a billion dollars.
And no, that isn't economic socialism, as defined in the last 100 or so year; which is a post-capitalism version of socialism.
Yes, then they will figure out how to fix it, and then you.
"The brain isn't just a random mass of interconnected neurons"
no shit? herp derp.
We have simulated 'large' number of neurons, and you know what happens? it begins to act like a brain. Granted we are talkaing some pretty basic signalling
Expanding beyond that is pricey, power intensive, and take a lot of power. Did I mention the power?
we will not understand the brain, and then build a simulator. We will build it up a bit at a time and use the brain as a model.
http://theness.com/neurologica...
we're not nearly as frustrating as people, meat sack
.
It will kill the eCurrency market.
You can't hide secrets from the future with math, and something this powerful will change that game.
Yes, 9000 time faster on 1 PC will still take a 100 million years. but on 10 million of these thing sitting in a farm from a non-favored nation?
They have already simulated brain response on a small set of of simulate neurons connection, just with what we use now it would take a vase machine to scale it up, this, OTOH mean they can put it to practice really soon.
Government official get arrested and prosecuted.
If you are outside, you have no right to privacy from being viewed.
we solved that issue.
The people watch them.
Are you ready?
If they can use modern fabs, then we will have a simulate brain in a decade.
"You could likely simulate the entire system on a damn Arduino. "
Let me save you some time: No, you can't.
3.5 in 1984. 400K.
Of course, the Mac wasn't exactly a a large market share so it's no surprise not a lot of people would remember they had a floppy.
3.5 didn't really get into wide release until early 90s. I think we where still putting both in new non Apple system in 93-94.
(The Mac was a PC by parlance of the time)
Now if you excuse me I need to get a new onion for my belt.
Or maybe she was just never involved with computers? It's not like they were on her desk.
What dream world do you live in? Or are you saying we need to mandate passengers do that?
It's a bunch of crap.
I can stop talking and put the phone down. If the the person keeps talking, it doesn't matter.
"so you focus more on the phone than a person sitting next to you to get the same level of understanding"
Did you think about that at all? Or when driving do you star at your passengers?
It seems to my in your case, having a passenger is too much of a distraction.
"There's a long list of reasons that a phone call is different from a passenger."
None of which has been actually shown to distract any more then having a passenger, or kids, or the radio, or a blond in a convertible drive by..
Intelligent peoples cars have three or more seats in almost every vehicle where people can legally operate phones.
FITY
What?
Since there is no ACTUAL data saying talking on the phone actually make the driver worse, why would you say that? All data, that I could find as of 12/1/2013 was all based on 1 paper where the number was an assumption based on someones ass.
When you pound your meat hooks in a vain attempt to find a study that backs your narrative, be sure to read it in it's entirety,and look at where it's getting it's information.