"Given the loathing that Christopher Tolkien feels for the films" huh. Now I'm glad Jackson did them. Anything to get under that leeches skin is worth the price of admission.
I'ts hard to read now. the pacing, the structuring it's all pretty much out of date.
And yes, I am a fan, I am literally in the fan club, had an 8 foot map of Middle Earth as a child and I wore a Frodo Lives! button. I have spent hours explaining to people that there are Two types of Giant Eagles and shows exactly why they couldn't fly the ring bearer any closer to mordor.
Clearly, I ahave a passion for his works. I recently read them to my children.. well, 5-7 years ago, and they where pretty painful in a lot of ways
Boson, gluon and photon are massless particles. Being massless is why they can move at the speed of light. You're pretty ignorant of this matter and you are looking really foolish.
The universe is expanding faster then the speed of light, as predicted. Light within the universe only travels at the speed of light. Look it up and try to use your neurons to learn something.
", but that it would be admitted to be less significant if it's found to insufficient to support the theory." and it might be depending on prior plausibility. When that happens, more data is need and more tests are run.
A box in the lab is good enough to understand that CO2 absorbs IR energy. THAT is what we are talking about.
You really, really, have no clue about climatology or Global warming, or science. I find the sad that you don't know anything about any of those and yet you state an opinion like it has meaning or relevance. If you did have a clue you would have a chance to learn how to change your narrative when actually facts prove it wrong.
"Impossible because the rules in the US are as such that you are not allowed to do anything that could result in threatening the revenue stream to current nuclear energy giants" that makes no sense since it's those same companies that would profit from reuse of nuclear waste.
No. he is saying putting it into the ground isn't going to kill us. Not that dumping it on the ground is good ebcasue it will get undergraound eventually.
"We keep creating all this waste that we have no way to actually dispose of." 1) Most of the waste isn't really radioactive. 2) The waste the is radioactive can be reused 3) We have perfectly good ways of storing it, but politics gets in the way.
The great pacific garbage patch is largely a myth.
A pit I mile to a side can hold all out garbage for the next 500 years. Our trash problems largely comes form putting dump that are two small just a few miles from the edge of an expanding city, and the fact that it is all local. We could put a pit in Texas, and rail our garbage there. If we ant to be reasonably proactive, we can split it up into garbage, recyclables, and 'organics'
I chose Texas because there are large flat expanse that will seldom be shut down due to weather.
The navy has had it's issue regarding nuclear safety as well. I would put any of the US's military organizations over any contractor for this issue.
Cheating in missile command test isn't rampant, regardless of what the media has spoon fed you. That said, the whole nuclear program needs to be removed from civilian management.
He didn't say capitalism was bad, he said "We need to get of this 'we;re great, capitalism solves everything' fox news mantra and look at what's actually happening."
Infant mortality is a horrid example. Every country considers infant mortality a little different. In the US, anyone born with any signs of life, who then die counts toward that statistics. In some country's, premature babies that are born, but die within 7 days don't count. Russia being one of them. When you normalize the data, are IMR is actually much lower.
IMR also doesn't take into account fetal deaths; which is a very important metric when using infant deaths as an indicator of country quality.
"Removing data points that did not fit their model" False.
", apply transformations to the data points that are not uniform across the entire dataset" false.
" using a filter that generates the same output even if the input was noise." false.
" Need I go on?" Why, do you have actual data?
You know grabbing onto one headline, and then not following up on what happens and using the one deadline as some sort of proof only shows the worled you are an idiot.
As it turns out, it was a lot of nothing stirred up by Fox and once the truth came out that the media was lying and using it's ignorance as proof, no one mentioned it again.
Slashdot Mirror
"Given the loathing that Christopher Tolkien feels for the films"
huh. Now I'm glad Jackson did them. Anything to get under that leeches skin is worth the price of admission.
I'ts hard to read now. the pacing, the structuring it's all pretty much out of date.
And yes, I am a fan, I am literally in the fan club, had an 8 foot map of Middle Earth as a child and I wore a Frodo Lives! button.
I have spent hours explaining to people that there are Two types of Giant Eagles and shows exactly why they couldn't fly the ring bearer any closer to mordor.
Clearly, I ahave a passion for his works.
I recently read them to my children.. well, 5-7 years ago, and they where pretty painful in a lot of ways
Boson, gluon and photon are massless particles.
Being massless is why they can move at the speed of light.
You're pretty ignorant of this matter and you are looking really foolish.
Shut you ignorant pi hole and listen.
The universe is expanding faster then the speed of light, as predicted. Light within the universe only travels at the speed of light.
Look it up and try to use your neurons to learn something.
And they should have been fired.
No thinks, I don't look good in Turquoise. aha, I kid. I look good in anything, and fabulous in nothing.
Joking aside, that guy is crazy.
", but that it would be admitted to be less significant if it's found to insufficient to support the theory."
and it might be depending on prior plausibility.
When that happens, more data is need and more tests are run.
There are parts of the universe expanding faster then light can travel through the universe whose light we will never see.
You'r god is tiny and weak if he can't make a universe that changes with time.
Heads up: There is no god.
Troll? Wow, idiots have control of the point today.
A box in the lab is good enough to understand that CO2 absorbs IR energy.
THAT is what we are talking about.
You really, really, have no clue about climatology or Global warming, or science. I find the sad that you don't know anything about any of those and yet you state an opinion like it has meaning or relevance.
If you did have a clue you would have a chance to learn how to change your narrative when actually facts prove it wrong.
wrapped up like a douche.
Not what he was talking about:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...
No, he doesn't. Reprocess and reuse.
The resulting product as substantial less waste with a half live measured in decades instead of millennia.
"while democrats are against anything that says nuclear anywhere."
you're pretty vapid, aren't you?
"Impossible because the rules in the US are as such that you are not allowed to do anything that could result in threatening the revenue stream to current nuclear energy giants"
that makes no sense since it's those same companies that would profit from reuse of nuclear waste.
Please, try new conspiracy theory.
Remove the market form it and all these issue go away.
and kids don't actually get sugar rushes, just so you know.
No. he is saying putting it into the ground isn't going to kill us. Not that dumping it on the ground is good ebcasue it will get undergraound eventually.
"We keep creating all this waste that we have no way to actually dispose of."
1) Most of the waste isn't really radioactive.
2) The waste the is radioactive can be reused
3) We have perfectly good ways of storing it, but politics gets in the way.
The great pacific garbage patch is largely a myth.
A pit I mile to a side can hold all out garbage for the next 500 years. Our trash problems largely comes form putting dump that are two small just a few miles from the edge of an expanding city, and the fact that it is all local.
We could put a pit in Texas, and rail our garbage there.
If we ant to be reasonably proactive, we can split it up into garbage, recyclables, and 'organics'
I chose Texas because there are large flat expanse that will seldom be shut down due to weather.
Again, politics.
The navy has had it's issue regarding nuclear safety as well. I would put any of the US's military organizations over any contractor for this issue.
Cheating in missile command test isn't rampant, regardless of what the media has spoon fed you.
That said, the whole nuclear program needs to be removed from civilian management.
He didn't say capitalism was bad, he said
"We need to get of this 'we;re great, capitalism solves everything' fox news mantra and look at what's actually happening."
And he is correct.
Infant mortality is a horrid example. Every country considers infant mortality a little different.
In the US, anyone born with any signs of life, who then die counts toward that statistics. In some country's, premature babies that are born, but die within 7 days don't count. Russia being one of them.
When you normalize the data, are IMR is actually much lower.
IMR also doesn't take into account fetal deaths; which is a very important metric when using infant deaths as an indicator of country quality.
"Removing data points that did not fit their model"
False.
", apply transformations to the data points that are not uniform across the entire dataset"
false.
" using a filter that generates the same output even if the input was noise."
false.
" Need I go on?"
Why, do you have actual data?
You know grabbing onto one headline, and then not following up on what happens and using the one deadline as some sort of proof only shows the worled you are an idiot.
As it turns out, it was a lot of nothing stirred up by Fox and once the truth came out that the media was lying and using it's ignorance as proof, no one mentioned it again.
You should follw up on that story.
here is an overview:
http://www.theguardian.com/env...
If you look you can get into the nitty gritty.
Her is hoping you can start to use your brain and change a narrative when the facts no longer fit it.
Douche bag.
" then it doesn't matter because it affects no one."
I wold of said:
" then it doesn't matter because it affects no one at the moment."
Say someone lied or made a mistake about a result based on an assumption. They could stop a whole field of research.
publishing is the FIRST step in peer review.