" wouldn't want my farm underneath huge power lines, ah, you are someone who doesn't actual like science, or understand EM. nice to know. on the plus side, the more people are afraid of this, the cheaper I can buy land under power lines.
What about leg room over time? I spend 4 hours in the air with little leg room, and then I get all the leg room I want. During that same distance on a train, you get adequate legroom for 2 days.
frankly, I would rather be uncomfortable for 4 hours then on a train for 2 days
and I've seen most of the country, and most of it is blah. the rest is interesting for 10 minutes.
"Also, quite interestingly, it's the standard way to travel long distances for Amish and Mennonites." no, that's' not interesting at all. it's what we call 'expected'.
moving hotel room? yeah, if you spend about 800+ per night. I was thinking of taking my family from PDX to Los Angels(then renting a car and going to disney) total train cost? 1500 dollars. flight? 1000 dollars. driving 750 dollars. so of the three option trains was the most expensive and the slowest.
.
Re:funny comparing to "high speed rail" elsewhere
on
Amtrak Upgrades Wi-Fi
·
· Score: 1
Yes, and the rail companies would still be killing people to take their property.
Cars are far better then trains, mostly becasue they aren't on a track.
Re:I believe I speak for a dozen people when I say
on
Amtrak Upgrades Wi-Fi
·
· Score: 1
Yes, if you cherry pick exact few situation trains..tie.
Re:I believe I speak for a dozen people when I say
on
Amtrak Upgrades Wi-Fi
·
· Score: 1
And privatizing those rails killed it. another example of the private industry unable to do infrastructure programs. Which is fine, they don't d [projects like that well. The government has a long history of doing them well. Yet anyone who has been polluted by Ann Rand* can't seem to see that.
*I did that on purpose. If it angered you you have become to emotional attached to that outmoded economic way of thinking. And by you I mean anyone reading.
if anyone is attacking the train industry, its the train industry.
They do stupid things. However I don't think the number would increase that much, sure people like trains...until it take 3 days to get somewhere they could fly to in 3 hours, and usually cheaper.
If I could take a train from Portland to Las Vegas I would do so, probably every couple of years. but I am in the minority.
It's implied in the context. You should read timothy 6. anyways the whole point of the chapter is to keep the poor happy where they are ignorant and believing.
And the literal greek translation is: Root for all the evil is the love of money.
Ethical behavior is incompatible with the pursuit of profit. false. "This is the essence of the old adage "Money is the root of all evil."' its: "the LOVE of money is the root of all evil."
which is false, but at least get the damn quote right.
potential? no, it is happening. the only potential is the end effect. And that is determined on what we do to reduce CO2.
If you roll 2 six sides dices, your most likely out come(potential) is a seven. Not matter what that potential we know for sure a number will come up.
dealing with change? are you high? look, if we do not reduce CO2 the earth temperature will continue to rise. Will do so until the CO2 is reduces. The fact that it may make the humans extincts doesn't matter to nature. There is no, well this is all the change it will cause so lets deal with it. there is continue to change, worse and worse* until it find a new balance. We we remove the CO2 down to 290ppm great, thing will be stable fro humans. If we let it rise things will get worse. Since we are the cause of releasing more CO2 then can be reabsorbed, it will rise until we stop, even if the reason we stop is becasue the earth isn't habitable any more.
Your like those people who say, well then the currently frozen land will be used for farming! I always ask..then what? Cause it ain't stopping.
Slashdot Mirror
Well when all the science is against your belief, all you have is angry response. I can practical see the foam and spittle spraying from you mouth.
" wouldn't want my farm underneath huge power lines,
ah, you are someone who doesn't actual like science, or understand EM.
nice to know.
on the plus side, the more people are afraid of this, the cheaper I can buy land under power lines.
the pictures say otherwise.
Different material, different surroundings. Fine for a 9th grade try.
Speak for yourself.
The garden shops around here are the plant equivalent to a record shop in 1985. Snotty and derisive.
no. Its to test an observation.
Jokes on you, I went out and looked at it and now I see spots, clearly it causes harm~
No they should not be failed. They should be taught better science and their teachers should be ashamed.
9th graders experiment had flaws? shocking.
What about leg room over time? I spend 4 hours in the air with little leg room, and then I get all the leg room I want. During that same distance on a train, you get adequate legroom for 2 days.
frankly, I would rather be uncomfortable for 4 hours then on a train for 2 days
and I've seen most of the country, and most of it is blah. the rest is interesting for 10 minutes.
"Also, quite interestingly, it's the standard way to travel long distances for Amish and Mennonites."
no, that's' not interesting at all. it's what we call 'expected'.
moving hotel room? yeah, if you spend about 800+ per night. I was thinking of taking my family from PDX to Los Angels(then renting a car and going to disney)
total train cost? 1500 dollars.
flight? 1000 dollars.
driving 750 dollars.
so of the three option trains was the most expensive and the slowest.
.
Yes, and the rail companies would still be killing people to take their property.
Cars are far better then trains, mostly becasue they aren't on a track.
Yes, if you cherry pick exact few situation trains..tie.
And privatizing those rails killed it. another example of the private industry unable to do infrastructure programs.
Which is fine, they don't d [projects like that well. The government has a long history of doing them well.
Yet anyone who has been polluted by Ann Rand* can't seem to see that.
*I did that on purpose. If it angered you you have become to emotional attached to that outmoded economic way of thinking.
And by you I mean anyone reading.
if anyone is attacking the train industry, its the train industry.
They do stupid things. However I don't think the number would increase that much, sure people like trains...until it take 3 days to get somewhere they could fly to in 3 hours, and usually cheaper.
If I could take a train from Portland to Las Vegas I would do so, probably every couple of years. but I am in the minority.
Shocking they aren't perfect.
I'm not sure how the MS blocking comes into this discussion.
It's implied in the context. You should read timothy 6.
anyways the whole point of the chapter is to keep the poor happy where they are ignorant and believing.
And the literal greek translation is: Root for all the evil is the love of money.
Just FYI.
and the evil in the sentence means not adhere to there belief.
Ethical behavior is incompatible with the pursuit of profit.
false.
"This is the essence of the old adage "Money is the root of all evil."'
its: "the LOVE of money is the root of all evil."
which is false, but at least get the damn quote right.
He's a smart guy who makes some really good points that are worth thinking about.
I know, you need to get vindication against people in the industry who actually make a differences, since you never will.
And the people who commit assault will go to jail.
Maybe you should realize you aren't that important and it really doesn't matter that someone took a picture of you in a PUBLIC restroom?
"public" like restrooms, gym locker rooms, etc.
why do you think those places aren't public?
Many are public. For example the police don't need search warrants in many of them.
this caucus has no subpoena authority.
I've never been to Paris, but I can gather enough data to show it exists.
Also, none of them mention the earth is round, so clearly scientist don't believe it.
You really have no clue about scientific studies and abstracts.
potential? no, it is happening. the only potential is the end effect. And that is determined on what we do to reduce CO2.
If you roll 2 six sides dices, your most likely out come(potential) is a seven. Not matter what that potential we know for sure a number will come up.
dealing with change? are you high? look, if we do not reduce CO2 the earth temperature will continue to rise. Will do so until the CO2 is reduces. The fact that it may make the humans extincts doesn't matter to nature.
There is no, well this is all the change it will cause so lets deal with it. there is continue to change, worse and worse* until it find a new balance.
We we remove the CO2 down to 290ppm great, thing will be stable fro humans. If we let it rise things will get worse. Since we are the cause of releasing more CO2 then can be reabsorbed, it will rise until we stop, even if the reason we stop is becasue the earth isn't habitable any more.
Your like those people who say, well then the currently frozen land will be used for farming! I always ask..then what? Cause it ain't stopping.
wow, could you be more wrong?
The majority of papers don't mention the earth is round, so clearly hardly any scientists believes that.
THAT is what you are saying.
So god damn stupid.