Any one who calls android 'Market fragmentation' is pretty damn clueless.
It's an OS for Many competing platforms. If it was all ONE platform by ONE company and they had different OSs, then you have actual market fragmentation.
Stop comparing Android to iOS. Its hows you're complete ignorance of the market.
compare specific devices to Apple device if you must.
" Android will become a real OS. " Are you 3 bits short of a byte? Of course it's a real OS. What it is not is a complete walled garden.
The pubs had a veto proof vote. Clinton managed to get them to include middle class people and not just the rich. The fact that he did that is pretty good.
stimulus spending works. Austerity has never gotten any country out of a situation like this. Never, ever.
Stimulus is about de-leveraging debt through works. And de-leveraging doesn't need to equate to a 1 to 1 debt trade off. Add to the stimulus creates long term tax revenues, and helps with the infrastructure.
So if we had people in the US plotting to do harm to Afghanistan, you would be perfectly fine with Afghanistan attacking the us and bombing you neighborhood?
Plus it's a cheesy as pussy war. If you are going to declare war on a country, declare war on that country. Then go it and deal with it quickly.
"The deficit going to zero was a result of increasing income tax gains from the internet bubble, something cause by the Fed." False.
" Clinton had nothing to do with it." uh, he stood up and told everyone about the internet superhighway that his VP had made public. Which pretty much got every investor looking at it.
"There has been no significant policy difference between Obama and Bush" Clearly you aren't paying attention. Maybe it' s the fact the the pubs lie and do what ever they can to stop anything from being passed solesly because they don't like Obama. We are talking about a party they drafted a bill, backed that biklll, then then stopped backing it when Obama said he would sign it.
THAT is what is going on. Obama has tried to get several policy changes through, al of which get stopped simply because Obama likes them.
Can you even begin to grasp that mind set and how damaging it is?
" It was 100% caused by overspending by BOTH parties" No. It was the War, and massive tax cuts. It's pretty clear.
Most people who talk about government and use the word 'overspending' are either incredibly ignorant, or intentional misleading people. I bet you have no idea about de-leveraging, government v. Consumer debt, or any macro economic concept.
Since things have improved steadily since he took office, and what he wanted to do was severally castrated. Why is Obama at fault at all? Because he didn't snap his fingers and make it all better over night? It takes a few minutes to burn down a house, a lot longer to build one.
I get why Romney would bring up the economy, I don't get why he doesn't get slapped up side the head every time he says it's because of Obama. Seriously, it's not like it a hard to find fact.
Bush was specifically told what was going to happen if he didn't curtail (at the time) banking trends. He ignored it, and when economists got loud he gave them all 300 bucks.
regardless of who changed the regulation to loosen things up, Bush and his administration where well aware of it and ignored it until the end of 07. At which point he created TARP. Something the pubs where for..all the way up until Obama got elected. Then they opposed it. by 2010 they where proposing everything simply to oppose it.
Yes, in fact it IS backed up by facts. They did nothing when they new about it, did things to distract people from it, and then have done everything they can to prevent Obama from implementing a better correction. And Yet, the changes he did get through congress did help.
Republicans have caused these events to unfold. It's a matter of record, one I suggest you read up on before spouting off on 'FACTS'.
You can't seem to grasp that consequences happen after actions.
I leaned a new lick watching peter frampton last week. Was that a waste? My kids and I had a discussion regarding quantum physics because of something we watched on TV. Was that a waste? My kids no more about our solar system then most kids their age because of some of the television we watch. Is that bad? My kids want to build things over the summer because of something they say on TV. Is that bad? My daughter likes doing experiments because of mythbusters. Is that bad?
I have used TV tio teach my kids about advertising shenanigans. Was that bad?
I could list a 1000 ways TV is good. Is there stuff on TV that is horrible drivel and nonsense? yes. But to dismiss all of TV because of that is no different then burning down all the library's because they have a copy of twilight.
Wow, jut wow. Watching you stack up the logical fallacies sis amazing. So, How much science and logic does one need to study before they become so mind numbingly bad at it?
funny, you're earlier post flies in the face of logic and science. It clearly shows you spouting off about thinkg you knwo nothing about, and railing against the government because of a market problem.
"...As always, more money and power for the government!" That's a policy decisions. This is science. Different things.
Detroit is a case of the local economy not thinking about more the one industry. The MARKET caused that problem, not the government. The government was left with thousand of citizen with no where to turn.
Do you really think normal cycles aren't taken into consideration? did it even occur into your brain that scientists know there are season cycle? That what they are talking about is ON TOP OFF the seasonal cycles.?
Do you even have the mental capacity to think beyond you won back yard for longer then a day?
Yes, it is pretty damn solid. Look at the data it's self, not some overblown ignorant ass wipe with a blog. The blog fails to understand glacier melting is a global event, cherry picks is examples, and has no idea what rapid melting means.
Slashdot Mirror
since my phone gets the latest android push as soon as it's available, I'll pass, but thanks.
Any one who calls android 'Market fragmentation' is pretty damn clueless.
It's an OS for Many competing platforms. If it was all ONE platform by ONE company and they had different OSs, then you have actual market fragmentation.
Stop comparing Android to iOS. Its hows you're complete ignorance of the market.
compare specific devices to Apple device if you must.
" Android will become a real OS. "
Are you 3 bits short of a byte? Of course it's a real OS. What it is not is a complete walled garden.
No different then the asshole who spouts off without understanding the engineering.
"(both parties are to blame for this)"
no.
The pubs had a veto proof vote. Clinton managed to get them to include middle class people and not just the rich.
The fact that he did that is pretty good.
stimulus spending works. Austerity has never gotten any country out of a situation like this. Never, ever.
Stimulus is about de-leveraging debt through works. And de-leveraging doesn't need to equate to a 1 to 1 debt trade off.
Add to the stimulus creates long term tax revenues, and helps with the infrastructure.
So if we had people in the US plotting to do harm to Afghanistan, you would be perfectly fine with Afghanistan attacking the us and bombing you neighborhood?
Plus it's a cheesy as pussy war. If you are going to declare war on a country, declare war on that country. Then go it and deal with it quickly.
After words, making it a US state.
"The deficit going to zero was a result of increasing income tax gains from the internet bubble, something cause by the Fed."
False.
" Clinton had nothing to do with it."
uh, he stood up and told everyone about the internet superhighway that his VP had made public.
Which pretty much got every investor looking at it.
"There has been no significant policy difference between Obama and Bush"
Clearly you aren't paying attention.
Maybe it'
s the fact the the pubs lie and do what ever they can to stop anything from being passed solesly because they don't like Obama. We are talking about a party they drafted a bill, backed that biklll, then then stopped backing it when Obama said he would sign it.
THAT is what is going on. Obama has tried to get several policy changes through, al of which get stopped simply because Obama likes them.
Can you even begin to grasp that mind set and how damaging it is?
" It was 100% caused by overspending by BOTH parties"
No. It was the War, and massive tax cuts. It's pretty clear.
Most people who talk about government and use the word 'overspending' are either incredibly ignorant, or intentional misleading people. I bet you have no idea about de-leveraging, government v. Consumer debt, or any macro economic concept.
Ignorant twat.
Since things have improved steadily since he took office, and what he wanted to do was severally castrated. Why is Obama at fault at all? Because he didn't snap his fingers and make it all better over night?
It takes a few minutes to burn down a house, a lot longer to build one.
I get why Romney would bring up the economy, I don't get why he doesn't get slapped up side the head every time he says it's because of Obama. Seriously, it's not like it a hard to find fact.
Bush was specifically told what was going to happen if he didn't curtail (at the time) banking trends. He ignored it, and when economists got loud he gave them all 300 bucks.
regardless of who changed the regulation to loosen things up, Bush and his administration where well aware of it and ignored it until the end of 07.
At which point he created TARP. Something the pubs where for..all the way up until Obama got elected. Then they opposed it. by 2010 they where proposing everything simply to oppose it.
Yes, in fact it IS backed up by facts. They did nothing when they new about it, did things to distract people from it, and then have done everything they can to prevent Obama from implementing a better correction. And Yet, the changes he did get through congress did help.
Republicans have caused these events to unfold. It's a matter of record, one I suggest you read up on before spouting off on 'FACTS'.
You can't seem to grasp that consequences happen after actions.
Probably not.
And you are correct. It's in the background of a couple of frames, with different hair. Hell, there are thousands of people who look like that.
cpu6502 is a troll, That's why.
news at 11.
haha I love how 'cutting the cord' now equals subscribing to several different cords.
Im so tired of this.
I leaned a new lick watching peter frampton last week. Was that a waste?
My kids and I had a discussion regarding quantum physics because of something we watched on TV. Was that a waste?
My kids no more about our solar system then most kids their age because of some of the television we watch. Is that bad?
My kids want to build things over the summer because of something they say on TV. Is that bad?
My daughter likes doing experiments because of mythbusters. Is that bad?
I have used TV tio teach my kids about advertising shenanigans. Was that bad?
I could list a 1000 ways TV is good.
Is there stuff on TV that is horrible drivel and nonsense? yes. But to dismiss all of TV because of that is no different then burning down all the library's because they have a copy of twilight.
No it isn't. Ignorance is the prison of the mind.
I lie how you think learning about math and science is some sort of prison.
Not every one sits around watching shows about fat couple with a nagging wife.
No, you suck.
It doesn't suck. Like any medium most of it sucks, some of it is good. No more or less then movies music or books.
Maybe you should think about the stories and no be so fanatically hateful of he medium in which it is delivered?
Wow, jut wow. Watching you stack up the logical fallacies sis amazing. So, How much science and logic does one need to study before they become so mind numbingly bad at it?
" I prefer logic and science "
funny, you're earlier post flies in the face of logic and science. It clearly shows you spouting off about thinkg you knwo nothing about, and railing against the government because of a market problem.
Logic is useless if you are vapid.
"...As always, more money and power for the government!"
That's a policy decisions.
This is science. Different things.
Detroit is a case of the local economy not thinking about more the one industry. The MARKET caused that problem, not the government. The government was left with thousand of citizen with no where to turn.
Idiot.
Seriously yoyu are being idiotic.
Do you really think normal cycles aren't taken into consideration? did it even occur into your brain that scientists know there are season cycle? That what they are talking about is ON TOP OFF the seasonal cycles.?
Do you even have the mental capacity to think beyond you won back yard for longer then a day?
I seriously don't think you can.
"Maybe so, but then again, we have no idea how it changed from decade to decade do we?"
Yes, we do. In fact, we're pretty good at figuring it out.
And stop implying no one take normal cycles into consideration, you twad.
Some people can think further the next week, slick.
Yeah, its a real problem, and a few inches in change is a big deal.
OTOH, your sig indicates you don't actually understand anything you complain about.
Since they explain why it is, there really isn't a reason to be skeptical.
Whivh piece of the data is gicing you trhe problem? BTW most of the coastal property is owned by rich people.
" tell you within 1 inch the elevation of a marker and to the best of satellite measure,"
so then..not as accurate as current technology.
Yes, it is pretty damn solid. Look at the data it's self, not some overblown ignorant ass wipe with a blog.
The blog fails to understand glacier melting is a global event, cherry picks is examples, and has no idea what rapid melting means.
It's horrible.
The data clearly indicates a rise.
New York - Hub of finance, art, fashion
New Orleans - Hub of alcoholism, ignorance and poverty.
All places are not equal.