" Digital currency is valued at whatever two parties agree it to be." False, and very naive. You need to bu other things, currency involve a lot of people. Two parties alone should never be allowed to dictate value of a currency. Currency need to be able to do interstate actions, Reusable, etc.
Yes, it is unreasonable becasue they do a lot more. IT's not a phone. It's a phone, wifi point, gps, game machine, music machine, video machine, just to name a few.
Solar battery takes care of the problem. You can drape it over a tent, or if you move every day, drape it over your pack. No, it' snot. Just take 5 seconds and some brain cells to solve.
Really, if you aren't going to pose something hard, then don't bother. I manage to keep my phone charged when IO go camping for a couple of weeks, I suspect you can to and are just being obstinate.
well, other then you have a free flying device with fast spinning blades near people, can only use it in good weather, and don't mine people screwing with them.
I have no idea what you know. I don't even know you're age. A lot of people have no clue that less then 50 years ago the range was that limited. Just pointing out a fact as it relates to people complaining about mileage.
A) This story isn't about batteries. B) This is a big breakthrough C) Batteries have improved, and some og those things do make t to market. You just don't hear of them becasue they market it's impact, not the technology or science. "20% longer! " Not "20% longer do to the tech Dr. So N So invented 5 years ago."
Nice to know aircraft carriers, 777s, and mount Rushmore dodn't exist in your wold.
Because they don't know how to make plugs in these cities? Plug it in charge while you asleep, or at work. Never take time out of your day to fuel up again. The environment you describe s perfect for electric cars right now.
Did you know there was a time in the use when gas powered cars could only go a couple of hundred miles on a tank and people managed to go on vacation just fine? That's why roads like the 66 and 80 are littered with ghost towns and closed gas stations.
In 1973, a Plymouth station age, a station wagon got 7-16 mpg and had a 16 gallon tank. The 256 miles, BEST case.
So I think people need to get over themselves a bit and relax about having to stop for a git during long road trips when the other 80%* is a hell of a lot cleaner. Yes, electric cars are even cleaner over all in state that use old coal plants.
OF course, you could rent or buy another vehicle for the road trip. Or take a train.**
yeah. and when it gets to 800, you'll say a 1000 and so on.
The worlds burning, but that doesn't mean you should take a whole 30 minutes to charge up. When fuel is 10 dollars at the pump with a longer charge seem better? 20 dollars?
The media of AC on slashdot was created becasue people should be able to say what they want without repercussions. I now think they where wrong and should remove AC.
People will scream about whistle blowers et. al, but that doesn't really happen on slashdot It's mostly an excuse to be an ass, and/or not think. Or troll.
They used to, but the people who started it that wan't a balance forward thinking approach to moving away from coal where ousted and replace with scientifically illiterate alarmist that only want to make money for greenpeace.
"It failed to prevent a partial meltdown of the reactor core." I succeeded on repvents a full meltdown, as designed.
"It failed to prevent a significant release of radiation to the general environment as 15 curies (560 GBq) of iodine-131 (the most concering portion due to biological uptake to the thyroid)": According to the official figures, as compiled by the 1979 Kemeny Commission from Metropolitan Edison and NRC data, a maximum of 480 petabecquerels (13 million curies) of radioactive noble gases (primarily xenon) were released by the event.[45] However, these noble gases were considered relatively harmless,[46] and only 481–629 GBq (13–17 curies) of thyroid cancer-causing iodine-131 were released.[45] Total releases according to these figures were a relatively small proportion of the estimated 370 EBq (10 billion curies) in the reactor.[46]
"The former requires fundamental breakthroughs which have yet to materialize and may never arriv" what? I thought dam technology was already here. Are you telling me I get to invent pumping water into a reservoirs to store potential energy and the release it when the is a higher demand? Sweet. I can think of many ways to store the surplus energy.
Which is exactly what it does. It informs. Just right now the people being informed don't like what the science shows, so they claim science is not being 'fair'.
The scientific community is under attack by the pubs.
When to argue against solid scientific facts, yes, they are being anti-science, regardless of their degree.
I've never heard anything more wrong the a scientist speaking outside their expertise.
Why don't you talking about the other non profit radios station, you know the ones the are more numeroius then NPR? of, right they're religious and play to you neo-con idiocy.
"And while the incurious and stupid might be confused by such accounting gimmickry... I am not." oh, you can't be wrong, there for everyone else is stupid.
Slashdot Mirror
" Digital currency is valued at whatever two parties agree it to be."
False, and very naive.
You need to bu other things, currency involve a lot of people. Two parties alone should never be allowed to dictate value of a currency.
Currency need to be able to do interstate actions, Reusable, etc.
Considering previous lithium anode had 50% efficiency at 100 cycles, this is quite an improvement.
IF you don't like reading about stuff that's in the load, then why the hell are you on /.? OR even reading this story?
Fucking ignorant haters are ruining everything haters.
Yes, it is unreasonable becasue they do a lot more.
IT's not a phone. It's a phone, wifi point, gps, game machine, music machine, video machine, just to name a few.
Solar battery takes care of the problem. You can drape it over a tent, or if you move every day, drape it over your pack.
No, it' snot. Just take 5 seconds and some brain cells to solve.
Really, if you aren't going to pose something hard, then don't bother.
I manage to keep my phone charged when IO go camping for a couple of weeks, I suspect you can to and are just being obstinate.
well, other then you have a free flying device with fast spinning blades near people, can only use it in good weather, and don't mine people screwing with them.
To paraphrase Fry.
No one owns cars in those neighborhoods, the parking is too horrible!
I have no idea what you know. I don't even know you're age. A lot of people have no clue that less then 50 years ago the range was that limited.
Just pointing out a fact as it relates to people complaining about mileage.
A) This story isn't about batteries.
B) This is a big breakthrough
C) Batteries have improved, and some og those things do make t to market. You just don't hear of them becasue they market it's impact, not the technology or science.
"20% longer! " Not "20% longer do to the tech Dr. So N So invented 5 years ago."
Nice to know aircraft carriers, 777s, and mount Rushmore dodn't exist in your wold.
Because they don't know how to make plugs in these cities?
Plug it in charge while you asleep, or at work. Never take time out of your day to fuel up again.
The environment you describe s perfect for electric cars right now.
If you arrived when the gas station was opened.
Because setting a phone down on a charging mat next to the bed is oh so hard.
So basically you couldn't have survived in 1972? I mean, you gas range would have been half of you current demands.
Wake me when people like you quite making excuses.
Did you know there was a time in the use when gas powered cars could only go a couple of hundred miles on a tank and people managed to go on vacation just fine? That's why roads like the 66 and 80 are littered with ghost towns and closed gas stations.
In 1973, a Plymouth station age, a station wagon got 7-16 mpg and had a 16 gallon tank. The 256 miles, BEST case.
So I think people need to get over themselves a bit and relax about having to stop for a git during long road trips when the other 80%* is a hell of a lot cleaner. Yes, electric cars are even cleaner over all in state that use old coal plants.
OF course, you could rent or buy another vehicle for the road trip.
Or take a train.**
*I'd say 95%
**BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHahahaha.
yeah. and when it gets to 800, you'll say a 1000 and so on.
The worlds burning, but that doesn't mean you should take a whole 30 minutes to charge up.
When fuel is 10 dollars at the pump with a longer charge seem better? 20 dollars?
AMA ?
The media of AC on slashdot was created becasue people should be able to say what they want without repercussions.
I now think they where wrong and should remove AC.
People will scream about whistle blowers et. al, but that doesn't really happen on slashdot It's mostly an excuse to be an ass, and/or not think. Or troll.
Strawman much?
They used to, but the people who started it that wan't a balance forward thinking approach to moving away from coal where ousted and replace with scientifically illiterate alarmist that only want to make money for greenpeace.
"It failed to prevent a partial meltdown of the reactor core."
I succeeded on repvents a full meltdown, as designed.
"It failed to prevent a significant release of radiation to the general environment as 15 curies (560 GBq) of iodine-131 (the most concering portion due to biological uptake to the thyroid)":
According to the official figures, as compiled by the 1979 Kemeny Commission from Metropolitan Edison and NRC data, a maximum of 480 petabecquerels (13 million curies) of radioactive noble gases (primarily xenon) were released by the event.[45] However, these noble gases were considered relatively harmless,[46] and only 481–629 GBq (13–17 curies) of thyroid cancer-causing iodine-131 were released.[45] Total releases according to these figures were a relatively small proportion of the estimated 370 EBq (10 billion curies) in the reactor.[46]
i.e. Not Much.
When they lied about apples products.
The stopped being about the environment around '82.
"The former requires fundamental breakthroughs which have yet to materialize and may never arriv"
what? I thought dam technology was already here. Are you telling me I get to invent pumping water into a reservoirs to store potential energy and the release it when the is a higher demand?
Sweet.
I can think of many ways to store the surplus energy.
Except it wan't actual broken or horrible. That's what an anti science politician keeps saying.
Why do you think it doesn't take science to do weapons research?
Which is exactly what it does. It informs. Just right now the people being informed don't like what the science shows, so they claim science is not being 'fair'.
The scientific community is under attack by the pubs.
When to argue against solid scientific facts, yes, they are being anti-science, regardless of their degree.
I've never heard anything more wrong the a scientist speaking outside their expertise.
Why don't you talking about the other non profit radios station, you know the ones the are more numeroius then NPR? of, right they're religious and play to you neo-con idiocy.
"And while the incurious and stupid might be confused by such accounting gimmickry... I am not."
oh, you can't be wrong, there for everyone else is stupid.
Psychopathy at its finest.