How so? you fail to account for the other people in the parking lot they will skin you alive and wear your skin as a poncho before getting out of your way to let you park in a spot they've been waiting for. Unless you cana find a way to take reservations for all parking space ahead of time and change society to accept that.
Large illegal protest can be just handled when enforcing something might cause a riot. Look at all the 99% protester who were arrested for breaking the law.
"Black Panthers who have been saying "Kill Whitey", in public, were committing crimes, yes?" No. Too generic. If they said Kill Whitey Ford, that would have been different.
You're usual insightful intelligence seems to have left the building in regards to this issue.
it's Racketeering. I'll make a space available for a price. There is exactly no other reason to use this app. It is also like racketing in that the person who collects the money won't deliver most of the time.
The App is a tool to make profit from insider knowledge. As the other poster pointed out, it is only useful to anyone who would hold a slot hostage. If the parking lot is busy, then there are people there looking for a spot. If it isn't busy, then spots are available. So telling people on the internet a spot is available has ZERO VALUE unless the specifically hold it for a person. Which this happens does because people are BIDDING ON IT. If it was just a this spot is available app and no money or good exchanged hands, then there wouldn't be a problem.
You know what else is just information? your credit card data. I bet if I sold that you would have a shit fit.
Or you are the fucking stupidest person on the planet. One or the other.
Auction off information you only have access to is insider trading. Holding a space to a specific time is auctioning off a space. This will be abused, and people will hold spots waiting for a higher bidder. Hey, just because I said I would leave at 5 doesn't mean I have to leave at 5. I decided to wait until 5:30 becasue..uh. I want to do more shopping. Yeah that it. OH, hey I see you are looking for a spot. I MIGHT be leaving in a minute. How much to make it happen?
You fail at logic and First Sale Doctrine knowledge. Well done.
If it says not for resale on the ticket, then that is part of the contract. The ticket is a ticket. Most of the say the purchaser of the ticket has a seat'.
Plus much of society sees scalping as unfair. That alone can be a reason for it to be illegal.
Can't charge market rate, for many reasons. a few of which os nthat the market changes hourly, and daily. Many of those changes are dynamic. A) 8AM the market rate* will be a lot higher then 945am Unless the is an event, say a store sale. Then it will change. So somoen would sho up at 7am, get a space for a dollars, wait until 8:05 and sell for 20 dollars.
b) Many people at the cities ages or industrial areas are low income workers, so a market rate parking can have a real financial dent. The public transportation response is a non starter until that are has good public transportation. When the expanded the meter are in Portland, Or. I know a lot of low income worker who basically lost 2 hours worth of wages. A 1/4 of the day just to park. What happened is they ended up parking farther away, in a more sketchier area.
c) I get a spot for 5 hours. That market value can flex dramatically 3 times during the 5 hours.
d) How do you determine market rate for after work hours parking? Free parking means more people will shop and enjoy the entertainment, so putting a charge cost business money.
*assuming the market rate is geared toward 90% capacity
It means their are error bars due to the limitation of the equipment and new equipment might change the answer at some decimal point down the line.
Example:
On my birthday I will be more or less 50. So if its before 4AM, in general parlance, people would say I"m 50 and they would more or less be exact. But if you accurately look at it I would actually be 50 until 4AM
Given all time and space it might happen. Also: given a sub set of infinity it MAY happen within that subset but WILL happen in a larger subset of infinity.
Pay attention: 1) Visible light hits the earth. Falsifiable, and tested. 2) When visible light strikes something, IR is generated. Falsifiable, and tested. 3) CO2 is transparent to visible light. Falsifiable, and tested. 4) CO2 absorbed energy from IR. Falsifiable, and tested. 5) CO2 in the atmosphere is increasing. Falsifiable, and tested. 6) The VAST majority of excess CO2 in the air is generated by humans. Falsifiable, and tested.
That's it. That is global warming. If you disagree with that, then you need to prove where the science is wrong. I look forward to your noble prize winning paper. If you read that and still think it doesn't impact the climate(climate change) then you need to show where the absorbed energy is going.
Some of you are very disappointing, falling into ad hom attacks and bad science. Scien that can trivally be checked out. But no, some of ypu moron keeps spouting the same crap. AGW is a scientific fact.
They never changed the name. Please stop being so freaking stupid.
Global warming = Energy captured by excess CO2 Climate change = how global warming impact the climate. Climate disruption= Economic change do to climate change. Te first two came int' use almost at the same time. They are all related but different things. No one is changing anything. I understand the the media confuses the terms, and some pundits use that as some sort of ad hom attack, but you need to be better then that.
No, it has not been modified, you should look deeper into that story.
Look at the record since 1880 it rise, levels, rises. levels and so on. If there wasn't man made global warming then there would be rise and a return. Look,m the global warming science is fairly simple. Certain actor in the industry are paid to intentionally make it seem confusing. Pay attention: 1) Visible light hits the earth. Falsifiable, and tested. 2) When visible light strikes something, IR is generated. Falsifiable, and tested. 3) CO2 is transparent to visible light. Falsifiable, and tested. 4) CO2 absorbed energy from IR. Falsifiable, and tested. 5) CO2 in the atmosphere is increasing. Falsifiable, and tested. 6) The VAST majority of excess CO2 in the air is generated by humans. Falsifiable, and tested.
That's it. That is global warming. If you disagree with that, then you need to prove where the science is wrong. I look forward to your noble prize winning paper. If you read that and still think it doesn't impact the climate(climate change) then you need to show where the absorbed energy is going.
You know that 'scandal' was completely shot done as a media created event, right? Did you fail to notice that as soon as actual facts came out Fox et. al. stopped talking about it?
two things. One - the vast amount of public transportation in the USA was initially designed to move poor people Two - tn's not cheaper then owning a car.
As a side not: a bus is a great energy waster. Less energy would be used if everyone who rides a bus drove a car.
If you want people to Use mass transit it needs to be planned at the tate level, and it needs to be subsidized. People aren't going to pay the same or more to be inconvenienced and be on someone else's timetable.
Anecdotal example: I worked at a company that gave everyone annual passes to public transportation. Half the people used to every day. Most of the rest used it 1-3 times a week. Plus we could use it at other time. So I would take mass transit to the zoo on weekends with my kids. I don't work there and I can't really justify paying more to ride the bus.
Why would it. They need more money to dot hing X. Reducing else were isn't more money.
And politician cut taxes often, and it usually turns out to be very harmful becasue they take money from critical areas before pork.
the 50's and 60's had great education in this country. Once the taxes got slashed in 69/70 education started spiraling. Did you know that when adjusted for inflation, we out half as much into the schools per child then in 69?
Reducing taxes is foolish. Find a program people don't want and has no use, get rid of it. Then reduce taxes to reflect the lower output. Or move the money into area that we need it in.
No, it wouldn't push that much wealth over seas. Stop buying into that crap. At least it didn't before. If it does now, we can deal with that.
Frankly I think we should go back to the 1968 tax rate with 2 modifications: 1) Adjust the income levels for inflation. That would mean the 90% tax rate would be on money over 70Million. 2) Don't tax the first 20K
I would also put a.05% tax on all trades, buy or sell. Put the money into education. The higher the education level, the better to country over all.
" $34-38k " You're a liar or you have an accountant ipping you off. I made 90K last year, took home 72K. Depending on you situation I can see you being taxed up to 34K, bit not only have 34k after taxes.
Slashdot Mirror
How so? you fail to account for the other people in the parking lot they will skin you alive and wear your skin as a poncho before getting out of your way to let you park in a spot they've been waiting for.
Unless you cana find a way to take reservations for all parking space ahead of time and change society to accept that.
Great! I'm going to exchange your credit card information for money.
If you try to stop me you hate freedom.
It's only information.
Don't confuse 'didn't arrest' with 'legal'
Large illegal protest can be just handled when enforcing something might cause a riot.
Look at all the 99% protester who were arrested for breaking the law.
"Black Panthers who have been saying "Kill Whitey", in public, were committing crimes, yes?"
No. Too generic. If they said Kill Whitey Ford, that would have been different.
You're usual insightful intelligence seems to have left the building in regards to this issue.
it's Racketeering.
I'll make a space available for a price.
There is exactly no other reason to use this app.
It is also like racketing in that the person who collects the money won't deliver most of the time.
The App is a tool to make profit from insider knowledge.
As the other poster pointed out, it is only useful to anyone who would hold a slot hostage. If the parking lot is busy, then there are people there looking for a spot. If it isn't busy, then spots are available. So telling people on the internet a spot is available has ZERO VALUE unless the specifically hold it for a person. Which this happens does because people are BIDDING ON IT.
If it was just a this spot is available app and no money or good exchanged hands, then there wouldn't be a problem.
You know what else is just information? your credit card data. I bet if I sold that you would have a shit fit.
Bullshit you are twisting meaning and misleading.
Or you are the fucking stupidest person on the planet. One or the other.
Auction off information you only have access to is insider trading.
Holding a space to a specific time is auctioning off a space.
This will be abused, and people will hold spots waiting for a higher bidder.
Hey, just because I said I would leave at 5 doesn't mean I have to leave at 5. I decided to wait until 5:30 becasue..uh. I want to do more shopping. Yeah that it.
OH, hey I see you are looking for a spot. I MIGHT be leaving in a minute. How much to make it happen?
yes, it can.
If the ticket says not for resale, then that is the contract. If you resell it you break the contract you agreed to.
You fail at logic and First Sale Doctrine knowledge.
Well done.
If it says not for resale on the ticket, then that is part of the contract.
The ticket is a ticket. Most of the say the purchaser of the ticket has a seat'.
Plus much of society sees scalping as unfair. That alone can be a reason for it to be illegal.
Can't charge market rate, for many reasons.
a few of which os nthat the market changes hourly, and daily. Many of those changes are dynamic.
A) 8AM the market rate* will be a lot higher then 945am Unless the is an event, say a store sale. Then it will change.
So somoen would sho up at 7am, get a space for a dollars, wait until 8:05 and sell for 20 dollars.
b) Many people at the cities ages or industrial areas are low income workers, so a market rate parking can have a real financial dent.
The public transportation response is a non starter until that are has good public transportation. When the expanded the meter are in Portland, Or. I know a lot of low income worker who basically lost 2 hours worth of wages. A 1/4 of the day just to park.
What happened is they ended up parking farther away, in a more sketchier area.
c) I get a spot for 5 hours. That market value can flex dramatically 3 times during the 5 hours.
d) How do you determine market rate for after work hours parking? Free parking means more people will shop and enjoy the entertainment, so putting a charge cost business money.
*assuming the market rate is geared toward 90% capacity
Simple.
Noise, pollution, and property values.
I don't care what you so in your yard,as long as any byproducts stay in your yard.
It means their are error bars due to the limitation of the equipment and new equipment might change the answer at some decimal point down the line.
Example:
On my birthday I will be more or less 50. So if its before 4AM, in general parlance, people would say I"m 50 and they would more or less be exact. But if you accurately look at it I would actually be 50 until 4AM
Given a specific period of time it WILL happen.
Given all time and space it might happen. Also: given a sub set of infinity it MAY happen within that subset but WILL happen in a larger subset of infinity.
"explain it like I'm five"
Because I said so.
Done.
haha, no I've never said that to my kids. I always followed the why question as far as I could. And when I didn't know, the internet did.
Since they are supported by your tax dollars, why not?
http://www.narprail.org/resour...
alarmist on /. assured my this would never happen, and that we would all be rounded up and tracked!
why are so many people her suckered by pundits?
Pay attention:
1) Visible light hits the earth. Falsifiable, and tested.
2) When visible light strikes something, IR is generated. Falsifiable, and tested.
3) CO2 is transparent to visible light. Falsifiable, and tested.
4) CO2 absorbed energy from IR. Falsifiable, and tested.
5) CO2 in the atmosphere is increasing. Falsifiable, and tested.
6) The VAST majority of excess CO2 in the air is generated by humans. Falsifiable, and tested.
That's it. That is global warming. If you disagree with that, then you need to prove where the science is wrong. I look forward to your noble prize winning paper.
If you read that and still think it doesn't impact the climate(climate change) then you need to show where the absorbed energy is going.
Some of you are very disappointing, falling into ad hom attacks and bad science. Scien that can trivally be checked out. But no, some of ypu moron keeps spouting the same crap.
AGW is a scientific fact.
They never changed the name. Please stop being so freaking stupid.
Global warming = Energy captured by excess CO2
Climate change = how global warming impact the climate.
Climate disruption= Economic change do to climate change.
Te first two came int' use almost at the same time.
They are all related but different things. No one is changing anything. I understand the the media confuses the terms, and some pundits use that as some sort of ad hom attack, but you need to be better then that.
No, it has not been modified, you should look deeper into that story.
Look at the record since 1880 it rise, levels, rises. levels and so on.
If there wasn't man made global warming then there would be rise and a return.
Look,m the global warming science is fairly simple. Certain actor in the industry are paid to intentionally make it seem confusing.
Pay attention:
1) Visible light hits the earth. Falsifiable, and tested.
2) When visible light strikes something, IR is generated. Falsifiable, and tested.
3) CO2 is transparent to visible light. Falsifiable, and tested.
4) CO2 absorbed energy from IR. Falsifiable, and tested.
5) CO2 in the atmosphere is increasing. Falsifiable, and tested.
6) The VAST majority of excess CO2 in the air is generated by humans. Falsifiable, and tested.
That's it. That is global warming. If you disagree with that, then you need to prove where the science is wrong. I look forward to your noble prize winning paper.
If you read that and still think it doesn't impact the climate(climate change) then you need to show where the absorbed energy is going.
Seriously, stop being a dolt.
You know that 'scandal' was completely shot done as a media created event, right? Did you fail to notice that as soon as actual facts came out Fox et. al. stopped talking about it?
You would need to give me an equivalent tables plus at least 100 dollar so I can rebuy apps.
They will tax electricity Frankly, this is something I'd like to see them start now for roads.
two things.
One - the vast amount of public transportation in the USA was initially designed to move poor people
Two - tn's not cheaper then owning a car.
As a side not: a bus is a great energy waster. Less energy would be used if everyone who rides a bus drove a car.
If you want people to Use mass transit it needs to be planned at the tate level, and it needs to be subsidized. People aren't going to pay the same or more to be inconvenienced and be on someone else's timetable.
Anecdotal example:
I worked at a company that gave everyone annual passes to public transportation. Half the people used to every day. Most of the rest used it 1-3 times a week. Plus we could use it at other time. So I would take mass transit to the zoo on weekends with my kids.
I don't work there and I can't really justify paying more to ride the bus.
Mass transit will not happen in a big way until it is done at the state or federal level and not at the county/city level.
Why would it. They need more money to dot hing X. Reducing else were isn't more money.
And politician cut taxes often, and it usually turns out to be very harmful becasue they take money from critical areas before pork.
the 50's and 60's had great education in this country. Once the taxes got slashed in 69/70 education started spiraling. Did you know that when adjusted for inflation, we out half as much into the schools per child then in 69?
Reducing taxes is foolish. Find a program people don't want and has no use, get rid of it.
Then reduce taxes to reflect the lower output. Or move the money into area that we need it in.
No, it wouldn't push that much wealth over seas. Stop buying into that crap.
At least it didn't before. If it does now, we can deal with that.
Frankly I think we should go back to the 1968 tax rate with 2 modifications:
1) Adjust the income levels for inflation. That would mean the 90% tax rate would be on money over 70Million.
2) Don't tax the first 20K
I would also put a .05% tax on all trades, buy or sell. Put the money into education. The higher the education level, the better to country over all.
" $34-38k "
You're a liar or you have an accountant ipping you off.
I made 90K last year, took home 72K.
Depending on you situation I can see you being taxed up to 34K, bit not only have 34k after taxes.