← Back to Users
FreeWorld+Community's activity in the archive.
Pirate bay is legal, at least where it is hosted. Why block it when internet surfers nowadays find more ways to bypass the censors.
I don't think anyone can pressure him to let go of the domain. The domain clearly is not a trademark name, Chicago and 2016 are widespread words, dictionary words to which no single individual or company holds legal naming rights.
Will this actually materialize into a civil case or die away in the thick fog of politics?
Slashdot Mirror
Pirate bay is legal, at least where it is hosted. Why block it when internet surfers nowadays find more ways to bypass the censors.
I don't think anyone can pressure him to let go of the domain. The domain clearly is not a trademark name, Chicago and 2016 are widespread words, dictionary words to which no single individual or company holds legal naming rights.
Will this actually materialize into a civil case or die away in the thick fog of politics?