You mean the way the democraps were this year?
And your assumption is false. The party with the popular majority is the only one that has control of the process to implement the gerrymandering. Democraps have been doing this for decades and it was fine and now the other side is in power and does it and now all the sudden it's BAD. You are a hypocrite.
What's really startling (not really) is the fact gerrymandering is worse in blue states than red ones, but we only ever hear (on this site) that it's all the evil republicans while the democrats are the poor victims.
Wow... TRILLIONS OF TONS be SCARED.
0.04% of the atmosphere is CO2. 0.0001% of that CO2 is the total contribution of all human activity for all of time.
Doesn't sound so SCARY when you put it that way though.
Still continuing the fallacy?
CO2 does NOT cause temperature to increase. That was proven to be a lie, and popularized in a fictional film pretending to be a documentary. The ACTUAL science proved that increasing temperatures caused an increase in CO2. Increased CO2 causes vegetation to grow faster/larger/healthier which means an increase in food supplies world-wide, which is what the liberals are truly fighting.
By your logic it would be perfectly moral and reasonable to set up concentration camps to house anybody who disagrees with your opinion as long as you claim a threat that is "going to wipe out the human race".
And I'm not exaggerating, liberals have done the concentration camp thing before. I'm certain I don't have to list names.
Have you seen the process to fire a government union worker? The person has to get a bad annual review, then gets transferred to another supervisor who has to give another bad annual review, then gets transferred to another supervisor who has to give another bad annual review, and then after 3 years in a row the firing process can start, which takes another 2 years minimum. The whole process can be reset to the beginning by the worker putting in a half-ass effort to get a mediocre review in any of those 5 years. That whole time the person can show up and collect a paycheck without doing a single minute of work. While not impossible, it is for all intents and purposes impossible.
The US Constitution was written SPECIFICALLY to limit the power of government. It's been ignored by both political parties for over 100 years and low information voters keep re-electing the same idiots so the government gets away with ignoring it.
Libertarian? Mass is a Liberal utopia, they were even the template for Obamacare. It's one of the most blue states in the country. This is what UNCHECKED Democrat rule results in.
That's actually hilarious. "Government pays so shitty"- are you thinking of a particular state government? Federal jobs tend to pay 70% more than private sector jobs with solid gold healthcare packages ($5 for a month of viagra, one guy I worked with used to brag about) and benefits like it's near impossible to get fired for anything short of a felony. I have experience working with federal employees as a supplemental contractor for many years, I've seen some of the crap they can get away with. As for equipment, they tend to have TOP OF THE LINE stuff for auxiliary functions like backups (I'll give you the point about aged crap as the primary systems). Most of that comes about by the fact the last month of the fiscal year, they typically spend the remaining 30-50% of their annual budget because if they don't their budget will be cut the following fiscal year.
So.. The IRS under Obama has committed a crime- that is an established fact.
The "victims" of this crime are seeking discovery as to who exactly was responsible for the crime and the IRS and Obama administration has engaged in a massive cover-up operation (remember Nixon NEVER committed a crime, he only participated in an attempt to cover one up).
You want to play blame the victim and call them mouth breathers? You probably also think any woman who gets raped is asking for it based on the way she's dressed.
Slashdot Mirror
You mean the way the democraps were this year? And your assumption is false. The party with the popular majority is the only one that has control of the process to implement the gerrymandering. Democraps have been doing this for decades and it was fine and now the other side is in power and does it and now all the sudden it's BAD. You are a hypocrite.
And which side do you fear? The Republicrats or the Demoblicans?
Both, if you're smart.
What's really startling (not really) is the fact gerrymandering is worse in blue states than red ones, but we only ever hear (on this site) that it's all the evil republicans while the democrats are the poor victims.
Obama read a wonderful speech off his teleprompter to earn one.
Wow... TRILLIONS OF TONS be SCARED. 0.04% of the atmosphere is CO2. 0.0001% of that CO2 is the total contribution of all human activity for all of time. Doesn't sound so SCARY when you put it that way though.
Still continuing the fallacy? CO2 does NOT cause temperature to increase. That was proven to be a lie, and popularized in a fictional film pretending to be a documentary. The ACTUAL science proved that increasing temperatures caused an increase in CO2. Increased CO2 causes vegetation to grow faster/larger/healthier which means an increase in food supplies world-wide, which is what the liberals are truly fighting.
By your logic it would be perfectly moral and reasonable to set up concentration camps to house anybody who disagrees with your opinion as long as you claim a threat that is "going to wipe out the human race". And I'm not exaggerating, liberals have done the concentration camp thing before. I'm certain I don't have to list names.
Have you seen the process to fire a government union worker? The person has to get a bad annual review, then gets transferred to another supervisor who has to give another bad annual review, then gets transferred to another supervisor who has to give another bad annual review, and then after 3 years in a row the firing process can start, which takes another 2 years minimum. The whole process can be reset to the beginning by the worker putting in a half-ass effort to get a mediocre review in any of those 5 years. That whole time the person can show up and collect a paycheck without doing a single minute of work. While not impossible, it is for all intents and purposes impossible.
You mean a unionized workforce.
The US Constitution was written SPECIFICALLY to limit the power of government. It's been ignored by both political parties for over 100 years and low information voters keep re-electing the same idiots so the government gets away with ignoring it.
Libertarian? Mass is a Liberal utopia, they were even the template for Obamacare. It's one of the most blue states in the country. This is what UNCHECKED Democrat rule results in.
That's actually hilarious. "Government pays so shitty"- are you thinking of a particular state government? Federal jobs tend to pay 70% more than private sector jobs with solid gold healthcare packages ($5 for a month of viagra, one guy I worked with used to brag about) and benefits like it's near impossible to get fired for anything short of a felony. I have experience working with federal employees as a supplemental contractor for many years, I've seen some of the crap they can get away with. As for equipment, they tend to have TOP OF THE LINE stuff for auxiliary functions like backups (I'll give you the point about aged crap as the primary systems). Most of that comes about by the fact the last month of the fiscal year, they typically spend the remaining 30-50% of their annual budget because if they don't their budget will be cut the following fiscal year.
So.. The IRS under Obama has committed a crime- that is an established fact. The "victims" of this crime are seeking discovery as to who exactly was responsible for the crime and the IRS and Obama administration has engaged in a massive cover-up operation (remember Nixon NEVER committed a crime, he only participated in an attempt to cover one up). You want to play blame the victim and call them mouth breathers? You probably also think any woman who gets raped is asking for it based on the way she's dressed.